the USA is not watching you!!!

silasraven

Well-Known Member
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/16/judge-rules-secret-fbi-letters-unconstitutional/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/16/appeals-court-reverses-cia-drone-secrecy-ruling/
well the usa government will not be watching you via drones in the sky. the supreme court judge said it was unconstitutional. but they might try something considering that speed limit on the high way near dc is monitored by helicopter


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/16/un-official-says-us-drone-strikes-violate-pakistan-sovereignty/
the USA's drones are bothering people in pakistan, just like they would if it was here. that is a shining example as to what life would be like with drones flying the skies.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
LOL... a program started by bush but now an outrage because a democrap is running the program... just lol
The fact that you would be cool with it now although you were outraged before is also LOL!!!

The fact that you dont understand what unconstitutional is and have doped it down into party politics is sad...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The fact that you dont understand what unconstitutional is and have doped it down into party politics is sad...
says the guy who is upset that obama took his state to court...and won.

whine about that some more, veronica! we all have a pretty good idea that you're capable of that!
 

gagekko

Well-Known Member
LOL @ this thread... Drones are already in the air - I've personally seen them twice. Also, the USA has more satellites watching the USA than they have watching the rest of the world. Anyone here is already subject to being "watched". But keep believing what they spoon feed you in the media - ignorance is bliss.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
The fact that you would be cool with it now although you were outraged before is also LOL!!!

The fact that you dont understand what unconstitutional is and have doped it down into party politics is sad...
Faux makes it all political but thanks for pointing out the obvious and making some retarded assumptions, your damn skull is home alone...
 

silasraven

Well-Known Member
http://news.yahoo.com/u-drone-monopoly-frays-obama-seeks-global-rules-050654158.html
well they might be.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama, who vastly expanded U.S. drone strikes against terrorism suspects overseas under the cloak of secrecy, is now openly seeking to influence global guidelines for their use as China and other countries pursue their own drone programs.
The United States was the first to use unmanned aircraft fitted with missiles to kill militant suspects in the years after the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington.
But other countries are catching up. China's interest in unmanned aerial vehicles was displayed in November at an air show . According to state-run newspaper Global Times, China had considered conducting its first drone strike to kill a suspect in the 2011 murder of 13 Chinese sailors, but authorities decided they wanted the man alive so they could put him on trial.
"People say what's going to happen when the Chinese and the Russians get this technology? The president is well aware of those concerns and wants to set the standard for the international community on these tools," said Tommy Vietor, until earlier this month a White House spokesman.
As U.S. ground wars end - over in Iraq, drawing to a close in Afghanistan - surgical counterterrorism targeting has become "the new normal," Vietor said.
Amid a debate within the U.S. government, it is not yet clear what new standards governing targeted killings and drone strikes the White House will develop for U.S. operations or propose for global rules of the road.
Obama's new position is not without irony. The White House kept details of drone operations - which remain largely classified - out of public view for years when the U.S. monopoly was airtight.
 
Top