Brother Hosebomber ......
I'll leave the studies ,from us ignorant humans ,aside for now .....
I'll just state some
hard facts to you ....
-Natural sunlight ,at sea level ..Most of it's power at "Green" ..(500-599 nm ... ) ...
Plants
probably absorb less ,( but utilise more efficiently _RQE_ certain wls ) abundant in energy (photons) wavelengths ....
-Shade Avoidance Syndrome photomorphogenic alterations ,are indeed induced when Green wls ,almost
dominate over all the rest wls.....
(And along with plenty of FR/NIR presence ...)
-HPS ....Good ,proven HID tech "flowering" bulbs ....Spectral Emission ,mostly at greens ...(yellows )
And a nice pic that " says " more than 1000 words ,about the whole matter ...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffreywarren/5412520298/
All the tech of NASA's (amongst others ) NIR vegetation satellite imaging is based on that particular fact ....
Plants do absorb and use green light ....
http://publiclaboratory.org/tool/near-infrared-camera
Simply ,less than other wls ,probably because plants evolved to do so ....
That being the hard fact that green/yellow light is
~10% more reflected/transmitted
(at ~20% of total incident sunlight ..) ,
than the rest wls ..
(blue & red ,reflected /transmitted ~10% of total incident sunlight...) ....
As opposed to 100% reflection of infra red light ....
...If they were to absorb mostly ,the most abundant wls(in power terms ) of sunlight ,that being greens/yellows ,
PS systems would probably have been oversaturated by 09:00 am every day (morning ...)....
But since us humans do not see the massively reflected from plants ,infra red light ..
We see the "tad" / "bit " of green that is reflected more than other wls ...
(
less absorbed by individual leaves ,but generally absorbed by canopy in it's total ...
Green Window ...
While massively absorbed reds ,for example ,are indeed absorbed from
top layer of canopy at general ..
But not from " deep interior" or " deep low down " parts of canopy ...
....
Leaf Canopy : A 3D structure ,consisting of almost 2D light absorbing small surfaces (leaves ) ....
Every part of canopy absorbing / utilising different wls of (sun)light ,
depending on it's POWER,ANGLE,SPECTRAL QUALITY & DURATION....
Add to that ,the " in situ "
local action of certain major phytohormones ..
I.e Auxin on apical meristem of new growth /shoots ,usually on top canopy layer ,where red wls are abundant .......
And a last fact ....
Look At Ganja's grows ,or at any plant grown under the Astir cheapo panels with plenty of CW/NW & WW ....
Nothing to be jealous of other plants grown under weird ,alien to PS systems , purple light ("poor" )combos ......
On the contrary ...The last have to be jealous of "white led " grown plants ...
Ganja on previous grow ,reached 1.6 gpw ....
...
Just some -hard- facts ,there ...
No pdfs ,this time ....
EDIT: Caution : I'm not suggesting on using Green/Yellow wls ,as dominant wls ...
All I'm supporting is the fact that for plant's if they lack those photons(green & yellows ) ,
for sure is not a " healthy " situation for them ...
As neither is ,when those green/yellow photons overpower the rest (violet,blue,amber,red,far red ..)...
And furthermore ...
Total light power ,plays a crucial role in all these ....
Another thing growing under 200 umol/sec and another under 1200umol/sec...
1200umol/sec of red & blue will probably "fry " everything underneath .....
As also 200 umol/sec of light rich in green/yellow wls ,will grow leafy and strechy plants ...
...