No. All you want to do is troll. You go back to quoting Rawn Pawl paraphrase George Orwell poorly and I'll go back to calling you a moron. I don't want to talk about Libertarian Socialism with someone who has never actually read a book written by an anarchist.
Emma Goldman, George Orwell, and Mikhail Bakunin are all great authors, as is Noam Chomsky. I have appreciated most of their contributions to anarchism. There are also a few authors, philosophers and economists who have contributed some while also having held some views inconsistent with anarchism, such as Proudhon.
Now seriously, I have read Rothbard and Mises (subsequently rejected their views). I know about that which I criticize. It is not unreasonable that you also be mature in return. To insist that there is a dearth of information available on libertarian socialism (anarchy), is truly asinine.
As for myself in particular, I'm not here preach. I'm honestly not pushing anything; I'm challenging ideas which are foul and dystopian. At the very least, I research them beforehand. If you feel that the ideas of anarchy are foul, by all means, criticize them. That only requires you learn about them, I'll debate and let you know when you're full of shit. I'm under absolutely no obligation to give you reports on the ideas of others, whether I agree with them or not.
Yet again you've followed me into a thread to change the subject of the thread itself in an attempt to find a morsel that you can misquote out of context like your signature. To try to appeal in a way that makes it seem like I'm not the one being trolled is a good idea though, it is honestly some good trolling.