An apology for you RIU members.

potpimp

potpimp

Sector 5 Moderator
sunni said:
and yet hes ignored the many posts about being homophobic is linked to actually being a homosexual
Click to expand...
You must have read that on the internet. Dr. Suess? I hate cigarette smoke with a passion, so does that mean that I'm actually a smoker?
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
potpimp said:
You must have read that on the internet. Dr. Suess? I hate cigarette smoke with a passion, so does that mean that I'm actually a smoker?
Click to expand...
First, you may not have recognized the sarcasm in her tone. Second, you are not comparing apples to apples. Third, Pink Floyd was neither Pink nor Floyd, now go ahead and talk amongst yourselves.
 
potpimp

potpimp

Sector 5 Moderator
see4 said:
First, you may not have recognized the sarcasm in her tone. Second, you are not comparing apples to apples. Third, Pink Floyd was neither Pink nor Floyd, now go ahead and talk amongst yourselves.
Click to expand...
I guess next you're going to tell me that the Beatles were not actually bugs or that the monkeys were not actually apes. I guess you know what See12 is. But then we're not talking Fuji or red delicious.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
First, you may not have recognized the sarcasm in her tone. Second, you are not comparing apples to apples. Third, Pink Floyd was neither Pink nor Floyd, now go ahead and talk amongst yourselves.
Click to expand...
Correct, but Floyd -was- one of the blues singers that Pink Floyd is named after :D
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
potpimp said:
I guess next you're going to tell me that the Beatles were not actually bugs or that the monkeys were not actually apes. I guess you know what See12 is. But then we're not talking Fuji or red delicious.
Click to expand...
The Monkeys were definitely monkeys. Ever hear a monkey try to play an instrument? Yea.. The Monkeys were definitely monkeys.

I love Fuji apples!

Based on your consent with point 1, point 2 and 3 are moot.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
sunni said:
yeah i wasnt being sarcastic i was being completely serious.
Click to expand...
Damnit woman. I was trying to defend you!

At least say you were exaggerating, or over-emphasizing... but being "completely serious".. potpimp has a point.
 
potpimp

potpimp

Sector 5 Moderator
see4 said:
The Monkeys were definitely monkeys. Ever hear a monkey try to play an instrument? Yea.. The Monkeys were definitely monkeys.

I love Fuji apples!

Based on your consent with point 1, point 2 and 3 are moot.
Click to expand...
No fair, you didn't say math was involved.
 
sunni

sunni

Administrator
Staff member
sunni said:
A series of studies recently published in the prestigious Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found higher levels of homophobia in individuals with unacknowledged attractions to the same sex, particularly when they grew up with authoritarian parents who also held homophobic attitudes. In the university press release, Netta Weinstein, the study's lead author said, "Individuals who identify as straight but in psychological tests show a strong attraction to the same sex may be threatened by gays and lesbians because homosexuals remind them of similar tendencies within themselves." In the same release, study co-author Richard Ryan added, "In many cases these are people who are at war with themselves and they are turning this internal conflict outward."


Im telling you man, you need to go to therapy, you're actually probably gay
Click to expand...
theres plenty more
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
sunni said:
yeah i wasnt being sarcastic i was being completely serious.
Click to expand...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8772014

[h=3]Abstract[/h]The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.
Click to expand...
That's hot.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top