Senator Rand Paul supports de-crim for Cannabis

Doer

Well-Known Member
I'm listening to him right now. He is introducing a Senate bill to chop those mandatory federal sentences into Community Service commitments.

I know people are confused. But, there are liberals, conservatives and nut-jobs in BOTH parties.

Here is a Progressive Republican Senator making a lot of sense. When politics works, these groups cooperate across the isle.

Not now, it is so drawn into armed camps. (see my .sig)
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
I'm listening to him right now. He is introducing a Senate bill to chop those mandatory federal sentences into Community Service commitments.

I know people are confused. But, there are liberals, conservatives and nut-jobs in BOTH parties.

Here is a Progressive Republican Senator making a lot of sense. When politics works, these groups cooperate across the isle.

Not now, it is so drawn into armed camps. (see my .sig)
Progressive?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
rand paul is pretty regressive. he wants to give public accommodations businesses the ability to hang "no negroes allowed" signs on the doors again.
 

patriot1776

Member
dont hold your breath, i am a patriot ( militia) and know his father personally for over 20 years.

rand paul was almost run out of the electionin kentucky until us patriots backed him and he won his senate seat, since then he's done nothing but talk the talk but when it came down to voting, he switched sides and betrayed us everytime.

this man is out for personal gains not to help you.

the pauls are has beens, move on, or do it yourself, you'll be better off then wasting your time waiting for a patriotic american in congress to do what you want them too.

it's not gonna happen.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
dont hold your breath, i am a patriot ( militia) and know his father personally for over 20 years.

rand paul was almost run out of the electionin kentucky until us patriots backed him and he won his senate seat, since then he's done nothing but talk the talk but when it came down to voting, he switched sides and betrayed us everytime.

this man is out for personal gains not to help you.

the pauls are has beens, move on, or do it yourself, you'll be better off then wasting your time waiting for a patriotic american in congress to do what you want them too.

it's not gonna happen.
lol, patriot.

watching someone call themselves a patriot is like watching someone with a large truck try to compensate for their small penis. i get a nice chuckle every time.

so i take it that since you knew the pauls for a while you're probably a white supremacist and feel betrayed that they won't be more open about their neo nazi underpinnings and leanings. amirite?
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
Not one Chinese food joint in my area has any whites working for them and they don't hire them.

So what makes them special?

 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
that's not what title II is even about, miss puffy pants.
James
Every White country on the planet is forced to become multicultural and multiracial.
EVERY white country is told to end its own race and culture.
No one asks that of ANY non-White country. Immigration and forced-assimilation is for ALL & ONLY White countries.
Anti-Whites call themselves "anti-racist", but their words & actions lead to the genocide of only one group: White people.
The true goal of anti-racism is to genocide my people.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
March 22, 2013 04:59 pm at 4:59 pm |

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/22/bipartisan-senators-close-to-deal-on-immigration-plan/?hpt=po_c2

This is how "patriots" think of themselves
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
lol, patriot.

watching someone call themselves a patriot is like watching someone with a large truck try to compensate for their small penis. i get a nice chuckle every time.

so i take it that since you knew the pauls for a while you're probably a white supremacist and feel betrayed that they won't be more open about their neo nazi underpinnings and leanings. amirite?
Watching you pay nothing into the system and then talk about patriots makes me LOL!!! Judge more little man!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Watching you pay nothing into the system and then talk about patriots makes me LOL!!! Judge more little man!
so i guess you missed the many times when i posted my returns for herr beenthere to cry about.

and yet you have never proven that you have paid a penny in taxes on your lawn mowing allowance.*

not that i think the allowance your parents give you should be taxed, just saying. i've posted way more proof of my earnings and taxes than you ever have, kiddo.
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
rand paul is pretty regressive. he wants to give public accommodations businesses the ability to hang "no negroes allowed" signs on the doors again.
Private business owners should be allowed to say who is allowed in their store whether it hurts someones feelings or not.

If some business owner is a racist asshole, let him be and Im sure all the other racist assholes will shop there too, making it easier for the rest of us to shop elsewhere and have less of a chance of running into one of these racits assholes at a store that allows anyone to shop there.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Private business owners should be allowed to say who is allowed in their store whether it hurts someones feelings or not.
if it only hurt feelings, that's one thing. but it does more than that. it causes demonstrable harm to the discriminated parties.

well, the SCOTUS thought so at least. which is why they upheld title II.

but who needs that pesky constitution, eh? who says your right to swing your fist has to end at my face?

If some business owner is a racist asshole, let him be and Im sure all the other racist assholes will shop there too, making it easier for the rest of us to shop elsewhere and have less of a chance of running into one of these racits assholes at a store that allows anyone to shop there.
number one, you're giving racism a platform. you're legitimizing racism by giving it a platform. we don't need to legitimize racism. we don't need to encourage a practice which causes harm to others.

number two, see part one of this reply. allowing private businesses that are supposedly 'open to the public' to block out sections of the public based on arbitrary skin color or nationality causes harm to others. it's unconstitutional.

i can't for the life of me figure out why so many people stick up for racism and unconstitutional practices while preaching to me about the constitution and freedom and liberty.

it's pretty clear that it makes us less free when we have to cater to the bigotry of racists.
 

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
i can't for the life of me figure out why so many people stick up for racism and unconstitutional practices while preaching to me about the constitution and freedom and liberty.
That is because you don't want to understand. You would rather yell racist at anybody who doesn't conform to your failed ideology. You would rather insult someone than have an adult conversation.
Maybe someday if you grow up, you might have a chance.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That is because you don't want to understand. You would rather yell racist at anybody who doesn't conform to your failed ideology. You would rather insult someone than have an adult conversation.
Maybe someday if you grow up, you might have a chance.
title II has been upheld as constitutional. perhaps you would like to tell us why the supreme court was wrong and you are right.

probably not though. because you're all talk and no juice.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Private business owners should be allowed to say who is allowed in their store whether it hurts someones feelings or not.

If some business owner is a racist asshole, let him be and Im sure all the other racist assholes will shop there too, making it easier for the rest of us to shop elsewhere and have less of a chance of running into one of these racits assholes at a store that allows anyone to shop there.
Landlords are private business's do they get to exclude?
Employers are private business's do they also get to exclude?
Banks are private business's do they also get to exclude?

I can think of a lot of private business's that affect all of us. Not just some restaurant.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Landlords are private business's do they get to exclude?
Employers are private business's do they also get to exclude?
Banks are private business's do they also get to exclude?

I can think of a lot of private business's that affect all of us. Not just some restaurant.
i believe employment et al goes beyond title II, but all the more reason for the entire civil rights act.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
rand paul is pretty regressive. he wants to give public accommodations businesses the ability to hang "no negroes allowed" signs on the doors again.
You can't take all the words (kiss Kiss) In this case of the Federal minimum sentences for pot, he wishes us to progress past that.

Labeling and taking sides go together, and I thank you for allowing me to share.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Private business owners should be allowed to say who is allowed in their store whether it hurts someones feelings or not.

If some business owner is a racist asshole, let him be and Im sure all the other racist assholes will shop there too, making it easier for the rest of us to shop elsewhere and have less of a chance of running into one of these racits assholes at a store that allows anyone to shop there.

You as a merchant can refuse to service anyone, for any reason, at least in my State. And you only find trouble when you say why. If you express that as your reason, even I will speak and try to turn it.

So, if you can't keep your racism zipped, then you are risking your business license is ALL. So, you risk your customer base. And people have a right not to be assaulted over anything about race color or creed or any appearance. I agree with that.

These laws are not what you think. Some fool tries to call me a girl in his store because of long hair, I have choices.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Was he progressive when he told Rachel Maddow that he thought business owners should have the right to discriminate and that he opposes the Civil Rights Act?

Who has the moral authority to make people associate or prevent them from disassociating?

If people are endowed with inalienable rights to their own life, liberty and property, how can another entity force them to act in certain ways if they are not inclined to ? Wouldn't the entity forcing people to associate or to disassociate be violating the first set of rights (life, liberty, property) of the business owners?
 
Top