i have 2 of these 4 my water dragons and they do wonders but they also get really hot...u couldnt get em to close or burn while def result...i was thinkin of borrowin the lights jus 2 see if they had any inpact but as i said they get supert fuckin ht and in my grow area it would def overheat the closet...if u can control the temps then i say hellll yea go 4 it they def put out some uvb and high lums
Exactly. 10% of nothing is nothing, not that anyone is measuring. Enough of the junk science:Well that's all great but will the high be noticeable?
Smoking it and judging whether it got you higher is laughable at best.
Where are the before uvb test results?150 -400 uw/cm2 is required for effect...more than 400 decreases production with no added benefit...below 150 and no detectable difference
Best was 10% increase in thc and 7% thcv in lab reports...sats respond better than indies but it is very noticeable in both
Causes a creeper effect as well as more of an uplifting and longer lasting high...in sats really fosters the psychedelic qualities
Have not witnessed an in crease in tichome size nor amount but cannabinoid percentage manipulation is seen with increased psycho-activity...also seems to reduce cbd percentages a tad
only affordable lamps I have found that produce enough uvb for this application
http://www.lightyourreptiles.com/ard3t546in54.html
http://www.reptileuv.com/megaray-metal-halide-uvb.php
Yes I have uvb meters and these are the findings from lab reports such as this
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-295/NM_BD18_3_19_13.pdf
Thcv was not tested for in this particular case
It is a scientific fact that 80% of subjects report improvements when given placebos. It's a powerful effect.10% of something is something, not that I measured.
That link gives no proof of anything to do with pot, much less the change in cannabinoid profile. I know from smoking I am getting a change in the chemicals involved with getting high. Exactly which chemicals is not that important. More important is that I can feel the difference in many of the strains.
You nailed it my friend!This is pretty much what I hate about marijuana cultivation forums. It's all a bunch of high people speculating based on speculation.
I want to see scientifically conducted research more prevalent on these forums with data,control groups, and peer review.
Smoking it and judging whether it got you higher is laughable at best. Run a control group, send it to a lab to be tested. Do not change anything but adding the light and send it in again. Next, tell us what you did and then let us conduct the experiment for ourselves.
Is this so hard people?
I take every method I learn on here with high skepticism and then run my own experiments to judge it's validity.
I am merely pointing out that your feelings, or anyone's for that matter, are highly subjective and to truly measure a change you need independent verification. I assume you are trying to help people with your method and I am just trying to point you in a direction that will add validity to your argument. This is a very young science and there is still a lot unknown about this plant. Most of the information out there is hand me down stuff with no real data to support it. Shouldn't we be trying to advance marijuana cultivation in this forum? Not advance the misinformation? In order to do that we need to have standardized methods that are already prevalent in every other research fields.i don't grow this stuff to satisfy control groups. to say that the fact you get higher isn't important is a bit comical to me.
I have the results but they are not published so no easy link...doesn't matter as I can see from the posts following mine that no one wants to really know anything so am not going to waste my time copying and posting them...only the highest results are published by the dispenseries I test grow strains for...they just want to argue semantics or some shit...so do your own discovery...All I know is I will always supplement uvb as from my findings it is more than worth it. Single addition to my environment that actually caused a very noticeable and documented beneficial increase in high potency and type.Where are the before uvb test results?
Stop being a baby and post the results. I asked for them so obviously someone here is iterested if you've got some form of documented proof.I have the results but they are not published so no easy link...doesn't matter as I can see from the posts following mine that no one wants to really know anything so am not going to waste my time copying and posting them...only the highest results are published by the dispenseries I test grow strains for...they just want to argue semantics or some shit...so do your own discovery...All I know is I will always supplement uvb as from my findings it is more than worth it. Single addition to my environment that actually caused a very noticeable and documented beneficial increase in high potency and type.
Below is the same clones run by the dispensary before I was contracted to test run strains for them and before they also began supplementing uvb.
http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102675987015-267/NM_BD16_12_28_12.pdf
This is why they are happy to pay my contractual agreement as well as the cost of the test rooms and equipment I use on their behalf but belong to me.
It's totally subjective and accordingly, unreliable. The best data presented on umpteen issues was by Mel Franks who sited U. of Miss. studies. That data alone is worth the price of the book.I am merely pointing out that your feelings, or anyone's for that matter, are highly subjective and to truly measure a change you need independent verification. I assume you are trying to help people with your method and I am just trying to point you in a direction that will add validity to your argument. This is a very young science and there is still a lot unknown about this plant. Most of the information out there is hand me down stuff with no real data to support it. Shouldn't we be trying to advance marijuana cultivation in this forum? Not advance the misinformation? In order to do that we need to have standardized methods that are already prevalent in every other research fields.
I gave you enough data. Compare that result to the other.Stop being a baby and post the results. I asked for them so obviously someone here is iterested if you've got some form of documented proof.
Its too difficult to type in a few cannabinoid levels but yet typing that post was easy enough for you...