North Korea

BarnBuster

BarnBuster

Virtually Unknown Member
More information on US and Russian high energy laser and directed energy weapons platforms if you have a mind to read it.

http://rt.com/op-edge/soviet-airborne-laser-restarted-600/

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/ADAM.html

http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/pdf/jfq-64/JFQ-64_115-121_Angell.pdf

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R41526.pdf

http://www.onr.navy.mil/~/media/Files/Fact%20Sheets/35/High-Energy-Fiber-Laser-System-2012.ashx

http://www.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2013/MDA/stamped/0603901C_3_PB_2013.pdf
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Harrekin said:
Wasn't the Star Wars project more a space based missile system?
Click to expand...
From what I remember, it had more than one prong. Beam weapons (based on the ground, in space or on suited aircraft) was one. The other was "smart rocks" evolving into "brilliant pebbles", homing impingers.

Harrekin said:
With a large enough laser, shitloads of capacitors and large enough solar panels (they're the preferable choice as an extra-atmospheric power source, fuck all clouds up there) they could probably make it work.

If only DARPA were more open to the public....
Click to expand...
I would not want to rely on solar for an energy-hungry military asset in orbit. I'd be sure to design in a nuclear power source, either a mini-reactor or a large radiothermal generator. cn
 
greenswag

greenswag

Well-Known Member
Figong said:
That's a really bad idea on the part of the future 3rd dictator to die in the last few years.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

"We will first target and dissolve mainland United States, Hawaii and Guam, and United States military based in South Korea. And the (South Korean presidential office) will be burned to the ground," the KCNA report said.

I hope that paper he's signing in that picture is his will
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
greenswag said:
Agreed.

"We will first target and dissolve mainland United States, Hawaii and Guam, and United States military based in South Korea. And the (South Korean presidential office) will be burned to the ground," the KCNA report said.

I hope that paper he's signing in that picture is his will
Click to expand...
It should be his will if he gets any idea to provoke us. We will strike first, we've done it before and it won't be the last time.
 
greenswag

greenswag

Well-Known Member
Figong said:
It should be his will if he gets any idea to provoke us. We will strike first, we've done it before and it won't be the last time.
Click to expand...
It'll be interesting to see what the first move of this 'war' is, I assume he will attack South Korea first and foremost
 
greenswag

greenswag

Well-Known Member
A snippet form an article two days old I saw in the side bar. This is of course before the mobile revealing of Unha III

Currently, Pyongyang is not believed to have a missile-mounted nuclear warhead, but it may in years to come. Experts believe the North has rockets able tohit Japan or South Korea with air, land or sea-delivered nuclear devices or dirty bombs. If Kim detonated a nuclear device, it would guarantee apocalyptic retaliation and war crimes trials for any regime survivors -- but if all looked lost, that possibility stands.
"We've never been in a situation where a nuclear-armed country has had to make that kind of call," mused Hardy. "If the leadership is going down like the Third Reich, this kind of last gasp action is possible," added Pinkston.
Were the regime in Pyongyang overthrown by war, the positives would be extensive. South Korea would gain a land connection to the Eurasian continent; a strategic casus belli would evaporate; northern Korea could be rebuilt and its people ushered into the global community; and Northeast Asia could advance toward regional integration.
But given the destructiveness of modern weaponry and the dense populations of both Koreas, experts pray "Korean War II" never happens.
"The casualties in a short time would be unlike anything we have seen before: hundreds of thousands in days, millions in weeks," said Pinkston. "The fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria would pale in comparison."
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
greenswag said:
A snippet form an article two days old I saw in the side bar. This is of course before the mobile revealing of Unha III

Currently, Pyongyang is not believed to have a missile-mounted nuclear warhead, but it may in years to come. Experts believe the North has rockets able tohit Japan or South Korea with air, land or sea-delivered nuclear devices or dirty bombs. If Kim detonated a nuclear device, it would guarantee apocalyptic retaliation and war crimes trials for any regime survivors -- but if all looked lost, that possibility stands.
"We've never been in a situation where a nuclear-armed country has had to make that kind of call," mused Hardy. "If the leadership is going down like the Third Reich, this kind of last gasp action is possible," added Pinkston.
Were the regime in Pyongyang overthrown by war, the positives would be extensive. South Korea would gain a land connection to the Eurasian continent; a strategic casus belli would evaporate; northern Korea could be rebuilt and its people ushered into the global community; and Northeast Asia could advance toward regional integration.
But given the destructiveness of modern weaponry and the dense populations of both Koreas, experts pray "Korean War II" never happens.
"The casualties in a short time would be unlike anything we have seen before: hundreds of thousands in days, millions in weeks," said Pinkston. "The fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria would pale in comparison."
Click to expand...
According to what I see, the nuke facility is in Pyongyang directly, and just around it. Pyongyang nuke coords: N39"00' E125"45'
 
fitzgib

fitzgib

Well-Known Member
this thread is a example of the lack of respect you yanks have for other people

the nonchalance way you lot speak of using weapons which murder people you have never met is disgusting

you fear daddies committed genocide in japan with your nukes
you should accept that its gonna happen to you one day
then maybe we'll be eating dog and watching korean movies in 50 years time about how they are all heros too
 
Reklaw

Reklaw

Active Member
The way i see it... is that the U.S is just standing up to its Enemie the NK threatens to use NUKES on U.S and S.K. So we are just SHOWING them what we are capable of, flying B2 and B52's just saying hey we can play that game to... i agree Innocent people should not die in war... but you know innocent people die everyday just by random ass gunmen, rapist, accidents, sickness ect.. YES! the united states may be a mass murder by dropping a bomb we really didn't know the damage to in japan killing 1000xxx innocent lives but we also hit the heart of there production.. so we were at war and hit TARGETS to slow there process. anyways im high an rambling on..

The world is already on a clock to destruct under gods terms.. And Rumors of wars, and Kingdom will rise again kingdoms and nations against nations... hmmm seems like we are on track.... I would be more concerns about the middle east Israel, Iran.. that's were ww3 will start..
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Reklaw said:
The way i see it... is that the U.S is just standing up to its Enemie the NK threatens to use NUKES on U.S and S.K. So we are just SHOWING them what we are capable of, flying B2 and B52's just saying hey we can play that game to... i agree Innocent people should not die in war... but you know innocent people die everyday just by random ass gunmen, rapist, accidents, sickness ect.. YES! the united states may be a mass murder by dropping a bomb we really didn't know the damage to in japan killing 1000xxx innocent lives but we also hit the heart of there production.. so we were at war and hit TARGETS to slow there process. anyways im high an rambling on..

The world is already on a clock to destruct under gods terms.. And Rumors of wars, and Kingdom will rise again kingdoms and nations against nations... hmmm seems like we are on track.... I would be more concerns about the middle east Israel, Iran.. that's were ww3 will start..
Click to expand...
At first you begin by stating the obvious.

Then it turns out you're a God freak.

Cool story brah.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
fitzgib said:
this thread is a example of the lack of respect you yanks have for other people

the nonchalance way you lot speak of using weapons which murder people you have never met is disgusting

you fear daddies committed genocide in japan with your nukes
you should accept that its gonna happen to you one day
then maybe we'll be eating dog and watching korean movies in 50 years time about how they are all heros too
Click to expand...
We also saved your ass in WW2, or you'd be under a German rule right now - so soon one forgets.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Figong said:
We also saved your ass in WW2, or you'd be under a German rule right now - so soon one forgets.
Click to expand...
The US came so late to the war, Russia had done all the hard work.

They also already entered Berlin before yous had even arrived.
 
S

silasraven

Well-Known Member
Figong said:
We also saved your ass in WW2, or you'd be under a German rule right now - so soon one forgets.
Click to expand...
Harrekin said:
The US came so late to the war, Russia had done all the hard work.

They also already entered Berlin before yous had even arrived.
Click to expand...
LONG LIve GERMANY!!!! the usa wanted to gain control of the war after russia to look good like they were the hero's. russia should get all the credit.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
silasraven said:
LONG LIve GERMANY!!!! the usa wanted to gain control of the war after russia to look good like they were the hero's. russia should get all the credit.
Click to expand...
Russia should get all the credit for having relatively 0 ships capable of defending England in terms of the channel? Cool story, I like it. :D
 
*BUDS

*BUDS

Well-Known Member
I think the turning point was the US involvement, not Russia ,German troops took Moscow around that time, the German army was the most powerful in the world at the time and needed to be stopped by a coalition led by the US.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top