NietzscheKeen
Well-Known Member
I may be the only one with these view, but I'm hoping to articulate them and test their coherence. My first post with all my reasons for doing this and goals disappered and I don't feel like trying to remember it or type all of it again. I'm not writing this as broken down and precise as Spinoza or even Descartes for that matter. I plan to come back and do that later. I'd like your thoughts and criticism on my logic, premises, etc.
Here is what I have so far:
The eternam is the cause and it's connection to the effect. The nature of the eternam can be observed by those that seek. This seeking is the begining of self consciousness of the eternam; the whole. We are manifested from the whole, but are never separate; never distinguished from the whole. As such, seeking is the begining of self consciousness of the whole; the eternam. From oblivion the eternam arose, to oblivion it will return.
Oblivion- the state of being completely unknown. Self consiousness- awareness of ones being
Here is what I have so far:
The eternam is the cause and it's connection to the effect. The nature of the eternam can be observed by those that seek. This seeking is the begining of self consciousness of the eternam; the whole. We are manifested from the whole, but are never separate; never distinguished from the whole. As such, seeking is the begining of self consciousness of the whole; the eternam. From oblivion the eternam arose, to oblivion it will return.
Oblivion- the state of being completely unknown. Self consiousness- awareness of ones being