Fonzarelli
Active Member
Can you now?i can't see them
Can you now?i can't see them
^^^Smells like sweet cherries^^^ I highly recommend this strain, but you gotta pop all the beans till you find that keeper plant.
The one I kept is much denser and more rounded on the tops. All the others were more conical shaped and airy. There was one that was extremely lanky and airy. They all smelled nice, but the one I kept was the best and the shortest. I tend to keep short plants.I can see them now. very nice. so there is a lot of variation and phenos in ak47 seed? any hints on which ones are the better ones?
seed source?The one I kept is much denser and more rounded on the tops. All the others were more conical shaped and airy. There was one that was extremely lanky and airy. They all smelled nice, but the one I kept was the best and the shortest. I tend to keep short plants.
What cmh bulb did you use on the 400?Here's miss lanky ak47. Super tall, super airy, super lanky, but still super tasty!
Retro White. Philips. 400w.What cmh bulb did you use on the 400?
SS from herbiesseed source?
What exactly is the source of that information? Mind providing a link please?From what I've learned, mmj benefits most in flower from 630-650 nm, wheras most mfgs make 660 the dominant nm. Here's my source...
over ~580nm or so (which has a Photosynthetic RS of over 90%!)
>
most of the ~660nm+ you actually need for photomorphogenesis - and you can get by with 630nm reds just fine.
>
(i.e. 630nm red is ~95% of the PSR of 660nm, AND they currently still have ~20-30% greater radiometric efficiency - as well as being cheaper than the deep reds - so there's more 'bang for the buck'):
It should appear early on in my thread. If not, ask there, and I will post itWhat exactly is the source of that information? Mind providing a link please?
Actually I can't speak for ALL dimmable ballast so to speak. This is just the spectral differences the 860w lamp shows when fired with a 400w MH vs a 1000w MH. I don't know if this lamp will fire with your typical high frequency e-ballast or not. I wouldn't recommend it.That is so counter-intuitive. Excellent empirical work Fonz !
Is this happening due to the method of dimming the ballast uses (i.e. is it PWM dimming or Amplitude dimming)?
Or is this a response of the electrons remaining in the higher excited states without being able to return to the ground state?
What chemical elements are used in that lamp?
OH!Actually I can't speak for ALL dimmable ballast so to speak. This is just the spectral differences the 860w lamp shows when fired with a 400w MH vs a 1000w MH. I don't know if this lamp will fire with your typical high frequency e-ballast or not. I wouldn't recommend it.
Like I said before, I used the 2 different magnetic core ballasts operating at 400w and 1000w consecutively. I believe you are referring to dimming electronic drivers?
It would be interesting to see if the spectrum changes for a typical lamp when dimmed on the standard dimmable e-ballast like a Galaxy or something.