#NRAlogic

[Canna Sylvan]

This thread is the stupidest thread I ever partially read. Canndo, Buck is gunning for your spot.

 

[Harrekin]

that must be why james holmes and adam lanza and jared loughner all chose high capacity magazines to successfully accomplish their massacres.

you heard it here first, folks. less firepower = more deadly.

In all cases, 3 ten round magazines couldve done the same damage with a less than 1 second reload time.

Duct tape can make a "high capacity" magazine ffs.

 

[UncleBuck]

This is not a sentiment I expected from you.
If you and I agree that the police are currently more corrupt than not .. would it not be simple prudence to seek the erasure of their access to better weapons? This nation was built on a principle of distribution of power. It frustrates the centralizers, slows their consolidation of an authoritarian state from the rot of the Republic. What finer way to jam a broomstick into the spokes of the empire builders than for you and me to have the same standing as a police officer? Why do you think I stress that the police are civilians? I would like to at least slow their being transformed into Your Total Security Solution, one that will ultimately treat dissent as a disease state as Your Total Conformity Solution ... and the best way to do that, and to underline the value of the individual, is to use the Second Amendment as intended. Lots of distributed guns (not disabled by puny magazines, a central registry, chambering limitations etc.) can interfere with and even unmask power grabs swaddled in the camouflage of acts of compassion. Of course, with three of four polled Americans speaking in favor of a national gun registry, I fear the cause is already lost. They've already taken you down, since you declare that you bought the most insidious message of all: guns, ewww. cn

nice strawman, bear. nice conspiracy theory too. i could almost feel the dystopic breezes gently wafting across the hellscape.

sadly for you though, my position is guns good, massacres ewwww.

all you're doing is advocating for us to have the most excellently equipped mass murderers, your self defense remains uncompromised by massacre mitigation.

 

[DonPepe]

woah now, bear.

this is the NRA logic thread, let's keep it at NRA level.

for example, people get killed by drunk drivers, so everyone should be able to drive drunk legally.

or should we outlaw cars? that way you can't drive drunk or otherwise.

gun owner is to murderer as car owner is to drunk driver, removing the gun is equivalent to removing the car, where as the drunk driver and the murderer are the actual problem.

 

[UncleBuck]

In all cases, 3 ten round magazines couldve done the same damage with a less than 1 second reload time.

Duct tape can make a "high capacity" magazine ffs.

1 second is more than than 0 seconds.

plus, what if they bobble the reload like loughner did? massacre over.

if massacres were comical, that one would definitely make the mass murderer's blooper reel.

 

[FootballFirst]

gee I wonder if this old mitt romney looking guy from oregon who is the only guy who tweeted this tag on this day and hours before unclebuck made this thread could somehow be a friend of unclebuck?

You know someone named Raoul Duck UncleBuck? Hey that rhymes! You and this guy should be friends, you would totally hit it off I bet!

lol, probably hates himself for being white and male! he must be in perpetual protest of himself. probably has massive debt from subscribing to Obama's fiscal responsibility.

but hey, all that credit card debt.......is an investment.

 

[UncleBuck]

or should we outlaw cars?

what is it with the gun crowd jumping to full retard conclusions?

have you not paid attention to what arizona has done? common sense penalties for drunk drivers have reduced DUI fatalities by 75% over the last decade or so.

no need to go full retard, common sense has its place. apparently, it's not in the heads of gun nuts though.

 

[DonPepe]

what is it with the gun crowd jumping to full retard conclusions?

have you not paid attention to what arizona has done? common sense penalties for drunk drivers have reduced DUI fatalities by 75% over the last decade or so.

no need to go full retard, common sense has its place. apparently, it's not in the heads of gun nuts though.

...... the rest of the post.......

• that way you can't drive drunk or otherwise.
  
  gun owner is to murderer as car owner is to drunk driver, removing the gun is equivalent to removing the car, where as the drunk driver and the murderer are the actual problem.​
  
  
  
  

 

[Rob Roy]

ummmm, wut?

all i did was simply list the constitutional legislative desires of the majority of the people.

but excellent rebuttal, comrade.

Gotta watch those Constitutional arguments that defy natural right. You could end up calling a black man 3/5 of a person. You're not a racist are you?

 

[Harrekin]

1 second is more than than 0 seconds.

plus, what if they bobble the reload like loughner did? massacre over.

if massacres were comical, that one would definitely make the mass murderer's blooper reel.

Hold up.

In these "no gun" areas, they could have reloaded (fully) a ten round magazine, a shotgun, pistol magazine, revolver... even a medieval blunderbuss and noone could have stopped them.

Probably due to the lack of legal guns.

 

[UncleBuck]

...... the rest of the post.......

• that way you can't drive drunk or otherwise.
  
  gun owner is to murderer as car owner is to drunk driver, removing the gun is equivalent to removing the car, where as the drunk driver and the murderer are the actual problem.​
  
  
  
  *

no one is talking about removing the guns though. remember that little detail? or are you stuck on full retard?

 

[Harrekin]

no one is talking about removing the guns though. remember that little detail? or are you stuck on full retard?

If you've any guns, there will be shootings. If you remove the guns, people will get creative with other stuff.

Restrict magazine sizes? I (hypothetical crazy me) will bring 6 magazines instead of 2, probably a couple of pistols and maybe even some explosives, because if you go full retard, wtf not?

I recently read that statistically speaking in the US; you're 3 times more likely to die by suicide than murder and 37 times more likely to pop yo'self than be murdered with a firearm.

Maybe just outlaw murder, there is empirical evidence it causes WAY more deaths than guns do.

Cos banning things prevents them.

 

[ginwilly]

no one is talking about removing the guns though. remember that little detail? or are you stuck on full retard?

Bullshit. You think people in the Senate and Congress and in State legislations aren't talking about removing guns? Could you be more dishonest? It will take several incremental steps to get to complete gun control, just like it will take incremental steps to get to single payer, Obamacare is a good start. Is nobody saying that? We were told when Obamacare passed that single payer was NOT or was the goal? I believe we were told both weren't we. But nobody is talking about taking away guns....

Buck thinks banning things means nobody will be able to acquire them, smokes pot.

 

[DonPepe]

no one is talking about removing the guns though. remember that little detail? or are you stuck on full retard?

you stuck on Simple Jack today? Copying more than one insult a day getting to be too much effort?

Some people are talking about taking away guns, maybe you should turn on the news. Not everyone is that shortsighted, but some are.

 

[UncleBuck]

yeah, can't even get comprehensive background checks but they're coming to take your guns.

#NRAlogic, it's full retard logic.

 

[kelly4]

yeah, can't even get comprehensive background checks but they're coming to take your guns.

#NRAlogic, it's full retard logic.

You seem to be an expert in retard logic.

 

[UncleBuck]

You seem to be an expert in retard logic.

what a weak rejoinder. your mind must be distracted by mama femspermy, as mine is.

 

[Harrekin]

yeah, can't even get comprehensive background checks but they're coming to take your guns.

#NRAlogic, it's full retard logic.

How would a background check on Lazlos mother have stopped that shooting?

Oh shit, son.

 

[UncleBuck]

How would a background check on Lazlos mother have stopped that shooting?

Oh shit, son.

the background checks stopped lanza from buying guns.

a gun safe for mama lanza would have done the rest.

 

[ginwilly]

the background checks stopped lanza from buying guns.

a gun safe for mama lanza would have done the rest.

Actually, listening to his counselor that said this boy is dangerous and going to hurt someone, it would have stopped it. There's no way of knowing if he could have gotten guns from someone else or not. Know why? he was crazy and people were shouting he was crazy. Crazy people tend to do crazy things.