UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
do you now refute your source as being unreliable and contradictory?
no, that's you.
do you now refute your source as being unreliable and contradictory?
Well i am sure you will agree that we aren't really talking about pistols here.
Buck doesn't know the difference between an AR15 and a select fire M16. So I thought I'd throw him a bone.
had no idea that mass murdering humans was "sporting".
Buck thinks that the AR-15 as being sold today was designed as a military firearm. The original AR-15 as designated by Eugene Stoner was designed as a select fire capable weapon, that weapon has been known as the M-16 ever since the design was first produced. The AR-15 of today was NOT designed as a military weapon, it was designed as a sporting rifle.
Why would you think killing people is sporting? You got serious problems bucky.
had no idea that mass murdering humans was "sporting".
you said it's a sporting rifle, but it was designed to kill people en masse.
What is your particular issue that needs to be solved with these weapons? Specifically I mean.
He just wants a big liberal government with it's citizens disarmed and other socialist ideal.
He just wants a big liberal government with it's citizens disarmed and other socialist ideal.
it's not really the weapons, it's the unfettered access to them, especially by those who have no business with a slingshot, much less a military style rifle.
I still reckon Buck is actually Charlton Heston trolling from beyond the grave.Now, I don't think I've heard the guy demand disarmament. Why can't someone be concerned without some sinister motive to take everyone's guns away? Not saying it's just you. There's plenty of heated tempers when it comes to this.
*its
i actually support the second fully. but the second does not grant unlimited choice of arms to anyone whatsoever.
Eric Holder doesn't give a fuck about the law.Just ask Eric Holder.
Eric Holder doesn't give a fuck about the law.
Fast and Furious?