Would you classify US drone strikes as terrorism? Why/why not?

mudminer

Active Member
bombs do what bombs do. they maim, kill and destroy. should the platform they are delivered from really be the issue or rather those who make their delivery necessary? drone aircraft, manned aircraft=same end result.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
That judgement is the one that active terrorists make when they drag their families along or use local townspeople as human shields
Fuck you families and local townspeople human shields, but yet you suck illegal dick when they come here to rape, murder, abuse our medical marijuana for cartels making money instead of those in need, get free medical without ruining their credit like I do, and protest waving Mexico's piece of shit flag.

You're fucked in the head.
 

kushhound187

Active Member
After how many people have been lost trying to eliminate terrorists, by both isreal and america, why should they continue to sacrifice brave young men. theres nothing wrong with using new technology to keep your people safe?

and dont be illusioned about who they are attacking and killing with those things. pieces of shit who orchastrate massive civillian attacks. these arent guys who breed and show pet bunnies. they kill people cause they want to use fear and murder to get what they want. WHY NOT RETURN the favour, and give em a taste of there own medicine.
and its not like they are using drones to kamakazie grow houses. then i would have a issue. lol who cares how you kill a terrorist.

id say crucify em. worked for the romans. lasts for days. a truly excellent way to thank a terrorist for killing one of your people. Im sure they would get the.message. especially if you did it facing into the sun, in somewhere like isreal. somewhere hot. that would deffs send the message.

and you can send their buddys some al quaida jerky.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
That isnt Terrorism that is act of war we don't blow ppl up in-less we have a reason to blow ppl up if you live by or near a terrorist then well you need to die.. or you need to take action and gtfo before you go boom i love the drone 200 dead not one soldier destroyed flawless Good Game..
Saudi Arabia is who blew up those planes, not Afghanistan nor Iraq. Bin Laden was a Saudi and funded by the Saudi government. I have no problems going after terrorists. We need to fuck shit up in Saudi Arabia.

After we level Saudi Arabia if there are any terrorists left, we go after Chechnya next.

In the meantime we declare Islam a group of militant combatants, like we do the KKK. Why is it hip to go after white supremacists after what Hitler did, but Allah is your people's best friend?
 

stoned cockatoo

New Member
bombs do what bombs do. they maim, kill and destroy. should the platform they are delivered from really be the issue or rather those who make their delivery necessary? drone aircraft, manned aircraft=same end result.
no it doesn't matter. the issue is with the number of innocent they kill
 

Nutes and Nugs

Well-Known Member
no it doesn't matter. the issue is with the number of innocent they kill
Mud is right.
The weapons do their job delivered by drones B-52s or pressure cookers.
The human placement of the device is what kills the innocent.

I'm personally opposed to drones flying over the USA.
But it's like the above mentioned weapons.
If the govt wants to bomb an area , it will.
 

stoned cockatoo

New Member
yeah I agree man that's why I said no it doesn't matter what or how the bomb is delivered, the issue is how many innocent people it kills
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Fuck you families and local townspeople human shields, but yet you suck illegal dick when they come here to rape, murder, abuse our medical marijuana for cartels making money instead of those in need, get free medical without ruining their credit like I do, and protest waving Mexico's piece of shit flag.

You're fucked in the head.
And all this time I thought they came here to work and provide for their families, invited by employment our business's offer them
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
And all this time I thought they came here to work and provide for their families, invited by employment our business's offer them
So, what you're telling me is no wanted in their own country: murders, rapists and burglars, ever come here illegally?
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
You are claiming the only reason they come here is to rape murder and pillage
What percentage of prisoners in the USA are Citizens?
So if an illegal, with a record in their home country, sneaks in and harms me or my family, I have your permission to cut off your penis and feed it to you?

We have the ability to check criminal records in other countries of those who come here. But, that only works if said visitor comes legally.

There are several incidents, you can Google yourself, of illegals who are now wasting our money in prison because they were scum criminals.

If people like you were to be the illegals whipping boy, the illegal loving nonsense you spew would all but disappear.

It doesn't matter how few there are, if we can stop one rape or murder by implementing such a system that I want, that was one too many if we don't. But it's not just one, is it?
 

mudminer

Active Member
Saudi Arabia is who blew up those planes, not Afghanistan nor Iraq. Bin Laden was a Saudi and funded by the Saudi government. I have no problems going after terrorists. We need to fuck shit up in Saudi Arabia.After we level Saudi Arabia if there are any terrorists left, we go after Chechnya next.In the meantime we declare Islam a group of militant combatants, like we do the KKK. Why is it hip to go after white supremacists after what Hitler did, but Allah is your people's best friend?
i wholeheartedly agree about saudi arabias roll in the 911 attacks and that the u.s. military response to the attacks was misplaced. if people taking part in human shield activity are doing so willingly then fuck em. but how does one make that decision? killing innocents is always tragic.
 

oldtimer54

Well-Known Member
i wholeheartedly agree about saudi arabias roll in the 911 attacks and that the u.s. military response to the attacks was misplaced. if people taking part in human shield activity are doing so willingly then fuck em. but how does one make that decision? killing innocents is always tragic.
Idont think the military of the U.S. gives a shit about killing innocent people so much so they have a term they use to rectify the situation it's called collateral damage...
 

mudminer

Active Member
Idont think the military of the U.S. gives a shit about killing innocent people so much so they have a term they use to rectify the situation it's called collateral damage...
gotta admit "collateral damage" does sound better than "we exploded innocent civilians". thats why i try to leave that terminology to those who need it to make themselves feel better about their actions.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Terrorism  


noun;

1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.


2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.


3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.




as the target of the drones is a legitimate target i do not consider it terrorism

if we were firing randomly into crowds it would be a different story.


collateral damage/ lives lost isnt something i am happy about yet one way or another they are unavoidable

at least using drones less lives are at stake than conventional methods (think Mogadishu or Afghanistan)
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
as the target of the drones is a legitimate target i do not consider it terrorism

if we were firing randomly into crowds it would be a different story.


collateral damage/ lives lost isnt something i am happy about yet one way or another they are unavoidable

at least using drones less lives are at stake than conventional methods (think Mogadishu or Afghanistan)
Define legitimate target?

Someone on Obama's kill list?

Bitch please.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Terrorism  


noun;

1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.


2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.


3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.





Perhaps without meaning to, you just described some of the playbook of government, whether drones are included or not.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Define legitimate target?

Someone on Obama's kill list?

Bitch please.
"leaders/ bomb makers/ footsoldiers of terrorist cells operating in lawless countries who have professed intent on attacking the us" would be a reasonable definition to me
 

azman

Active Member
im not from america, and cant condone the killing of any civilians.
how can any one value life so cheaply as to label it collateral damage?
if the shoe were on the other foot and the "terrorists" had the drones and used them against you, how would you respond to this?
i dont believe there can be a bad race, just bad people,
i would never join the military in my country, not because im a coward but because im not a porn in some political game.
especially when my country is being given away hand over fist any way.
 
Top