ZOMG! Rand Paul hates drones killing terrorists, but is ok to use on Americans

[ChesusRice]

(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.

 

[lifegoesonbrah]

(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.

If you actually listened to the interview, he said if someone is actively posing a threat to others, we should use technology to take them out. We shouldn't preemptively stalk people with drones. How did you come up with that thread title? He was agreeing that the drone search was appropriate in finding the terrorist as he was an active threat.

Thread fail.

 

[echelon1k1]

(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.

asshat thread from the ladyboy lover... cheers for wasting my time...

 

[UncleBuck]

 

[NoDrama]

Got to be some kind of record.

 

[gagekko]

Usa... Usa... Usa!!!!

 

[ChesusRice]

If you actually listened to the interview, he said if someone is actively posing a threat to others, we should use technology to take them out. We shouldn't preemptively stalk people with drones. How did you come up with that thread title? He was agreeing that the drone search was appropriate in finding the terrorist as he was an active threat.

Thread fail.

Boils down to him saying he was ok with killing Americans on American soil

 

[Doer]

The strange thing about politics is the more outrageous they are, the more love they get from their base.

 

[Moldy]

(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.

It just depends on which way the wind is blowing that day for Rand. One day he hates weed and the next day he wants it legal, yada, yada, fucking politicians!

 

[Harrekin]

(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.

You realise the cops use helicopters already right? He said he is against them being used passively, but why not use them to engage an active threat.

What exactly is the difference in your mind between a flying machine with a crew and a flying machine with no onboard crew?

Who was it signed the NDAA btw? Too busy hugging his nuts to notice?

 

[ChesusRice]

You realise the cops use helicopters already right? He said he is against them being used passively, but why not use them to engage an active threat.

What exactly is the difference in your mind between a flying machine with a crew and a flying machine with no onboard crew?

Who was it signed the NDAA btw? Too busy hugging his nuts to notice?

What was Possum head filibustering against?
2 Weeks ago?
Something about using drones US soil against American citizens?

 

[Harrekin]

What was Possum head filibustering against?
2 Weeks ago?
Something about using drones US soil against American citizens?

He was talking about using them without cause.

If you don't see the distinction, you should just go back to your lady-boy.

 

[ChesusRice]

He was talking about using them without cause.

If you don't see the distinction, you should just go back to your lady-boy.

So we use drones without cause? Ya don't say. Care to be less vague?

 

[Doer]

So we use drones without cause? Ya don't say. Care to be less vague?

A drone with no purpose is a model airplane.

And why diss lady-boys?

We use drones for our own purposes; the cause is America. We are extremely self-centered that way.

 

[lifegoesonbrah]

So we use drones without cause? Ya don't say. Care to be less vague?

Drones being used to hunt an active target going around killing people versus spying on individuals without warrant, how is that vague?

 

[Doer]

Drones being used to hunt an active target going around killing people versus spying on individuals without warrant, how is that vague?

I'm afraid you don't understand the camera laws. It was decided in the so called, Jane Mansfield case. You can stand outside a restaurant on public property and film her sitting there. No AUDIO.

So, don't fly the light planes either I guess? Did you know the skies are already patrolled and all the ground features photographed by maned aircraft? EPA, power lines and law enforcement. No Audio.

It's all photographed from space, down to facial details.

I can fly my little camera drone up to the second floor from the sidewalk and look in your window. It is not un-lawful to photograph each other in self-rule. There are just certain limits.

 

[ChesusRice]

Drones being used to hunt an active target going around killing people versus spying on individuals without warrant, how is that vague?

He filibustered for 13 hours protesting the use of drones to target Americans. Now he says we can use them to take out suspeCts that are American on American soil

 

[Harrekin]

He filibustered for 13 hours protesting the use of drones to target Americans. Now he says we can use them to take out suspeCts that are American on American soil

Dude, someone in the process of committing a crime is different to someone googling how bombs are made out of curiosity.

Opossum head was protesting in defense of the latter, I don't even like the faux-Libertarian Paul family but lets not talk complete bullshit.

Wanna talk about something significant? Lets talk about Executive Privilidge being used on Fast and Furious.

 

[Doer]

I heard some bonehead the other day say the Privilege was not in the Constitution.

Fools. We have a very detailed Constitution, that grants rights to govt, not the other way, just get over it.

It's our Lord or the Flies Island and we run it ourselves. It ain't as easy as blame the King, I'll tell you that.

 

[Harrekin]

I heard some bonehead the other day say the Privilege was not in the Constitution.

Fools. We have a very detailed Constitution, that grants rights to govt, not the other way, just get over it.

It's our Lord or the Flies Island and we run it ourselves. It ain't as easy as blame the King, I'll tell you that.

Wtf you talking about bro?

Do you just thesaurus-fuck all your posts?