My retort:
No, nu uh, nope, sorry, nope, no and No. Like I said, I provided proof to back up every claim, you provided nothing.
Now, as to the trying to compare something like 10 tons of steel to 200,000 tons of steel is indeed ad ridiculum.
Oh and BTW, Gasoline and diesel fuel are different, and burn at different temperatures. Diesel burns at 600F....Gasoline burns at 1054F
WOW what A DIFFERENCE!!
Look Over there!!
You proved ........ NOT A DAMN THING.
gasoline burns at 495 degrees in open air.
diesel burns at 410 in open air.
lowly coal,burns at 800-1000 degrees
even charcoal produces more heat than either gasoline or diesel in open air burning.
your claims of gasoline's 1054 degree blast furnace level heat is impossible without a refactory or high pressures. with such a refactory, like say... a concrete and steel highrise, even natural gas, diesel or lowly charcoal can develop sufficient heat to melt steel which none of these can do in open air.
but thats the core of the Troofer's assertions. steel does not have to be MELTED to be softened, and when softened it can cause a building to collapse, much in the way the stick of gum that comes with baseball cards can be used as a weapon, but once you have gnawed on it for a while it becomes a shapeless mass which can be blown into an impressively large air filled sphere.
see thats why you can walk on a lake's surface in the dead of winter, but come august that same lake simply will not support your weight. the water only got like 20 degrees warmer and it lost all ability to hold it's shape or support a load.
metals can do the same thing, but most require much higher temperatures (except mercury)
i dont have to prove that diesel fires COULD cause a collaspe of a steel framed structure, or even that a wood fire of sufficent size could do it. it's simply a fact. steel doesnt need THAT much heat to soften, anyone who ever used an acetylene torch can tell you that, and when it's under a load, softening causes the steel to fail, and the structure WILL fall.
what you really do need to prove, because it is an outre' and bizarre claim, is that the cia,, mossad, the us congress, the fbi, or 7 foot lizard aliens hatched a plot to destroy the world trade center towers and building 7 so some jewish guy could collect the insurance money...
im still not entirely clear which crazt theory you are espousing, save that you are indeed espousing ONE of them at least.
the main bee in your bonnet seems to be the assertion (which is WROOOONG!!!!) that the NIST declared WTC7 fell down because of ordinary office furniture fires with no other contributing factor, which you then demolish, as it stands there helpless and impotent like any good strawman should.
maybe you dont get the "strawman" idea. it's not a scarecrow or a fiction for it's own purposes. the "strawman" is actually more like this:
so when somebody says strawman, think "inflatable punch clown" instead.
