Bigtacofarmer
Well-Known Member
yup I donate all my roaches. That guy can't smoke em as fast as I make em!
caregivers really give free meds?
- Thread starter c3llblock
- Start date
ProfessorPotSnob
New Member
Same here bro lol
Cory and trevor
Well-Known Member
me third! LOL I thought I was the only one and I'd sound like a dick for it. he love roaches though (or free stuff....)
DemonTrich
Well-Known Member
i make decent money, and im honest with my old cg(s). even tho im currently in LARA limbo (switched from patient to being able to possess plants). i pay 210 for a zip of pineapple express FIRE, or 10/g if anything less than a half (110/half). its the bomb ass shit!!! still smoking this strain after 4 months, and still does the job. no tollerance build-up. he is also getting me 4 rooted clones of it (in 2 weeks), and ill return the favor and offer him clones of my pineapple chunk and laughing budda. i have alot of friends who are NOT card holders and always ask me to buy my meds. sorry, get your card and i can help, otherwise go smoke the ghetto shit your used to getting. friends or no friends, i have principals and will not break the law in selling them my medicine. now dont get me wrong i will smoke with them, just not sell them my stuff. ive even been offered 400/oz, sorry but no.
ProfessorPotSnob
New Member
Free Roaches , Free Hash and Butter is another gift I give . My flowers pay the bills and the rest are just added bonuses for all involved patients 
Bigtacofarmer
Well-Known Member
Firstoffallen
Active Member
michelangelo was paid for painting the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel. At first he was supposed to paint Christ and 12 apostles, and the payment was agreed upon. In the end he painted all those scenes from rhe Old Testament + a lot of extra figures, over 300 figures in all. but the pope only paid what was originally agreed. Many years later Michelangelo painted the largeLast Judgment on the wall above the altar in the Sistine Chapel. This time he was paid better.(ty wiki). Plus your analogy blows production of a usable product compared to a piece of art is pretty dumb
HGK420
Well-Known Member
I don't produce "Usable product", I produce art
and spend a lot of time on my girls. ANYONE could come to my house and use my exact set up and is going to get different result then me. especially if they don't put the time in. i spend more time in my rooms than michelangelo did on his wall daily i bet and it shows in the product. we already resolved the fact that maybe it was a bad analogy so welcome to page 3..... and we already figured out greedy patients blow and can fuck off.... so ya way to randomly talk shit about something thats days old.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
2 plants a rip off?? I would take it. If and only if you were kin or a really really good friend I would give you one.
Firstoffallen
Active Member
im sry didn't know stupid had an expiration date continue producing art but just so we are clear Micky never worried bout getting his door booted and his paints takenI don't produce "Usable product", I produce art
An ounce lasts me 1 week.
HGK420
Well-Known Member
Wood id try to find a caregiver who needs a lot of help maybe even a partner and buy some lights or something else along those lines. maybe even become a caregiver yourself? sounds like you got a serious appetite! I know when i got a serious amount to trim my patients will come help out and i hook them up royally for that.
medical/420
Active Member
I signed my plants over to a caregiver, and he gives me my 2.5 oz every month. than $150 after that. he dont waste money on "expensive chemicals" tho, he uses a super soil/living organic reused soil in big contaners.
GregS
Well-Known Member
I have never understood how it is that attitudes that suggest, and more often demand, that giving the stuff away make good sense. The shit is an agricultural commodity. Do we agree? What other commodity is given away? Anything that requires any real amount of time, effort, and money to produce and is in demand is fair game to buy and sell. Welcome to America.
The notion that what growers receive in compensation is a donation is strange. It is a sale. The Supreme Court ruled that sales are permitted between patients and their respective caregivers, and that transactions cannot occur outside that relationship. Even before the ruling there was nothing to require that payment for production be considered a donation. Can anyone explain this "donation" meme to me? Where did that come from?
If you can't afford to grow it, you can't afford to buy it. Family and close friends as caregivers can be a source of free dope, but that is not to say they must bear the cost unless they agree. Patients who try to manipulate caregivers into giving away what they put earnest resources into are dishonest. If, on the other hand, someone has a gratuitous personal need to feel warm and fuzzy by giving it away, then by all means, knock yourself out. It might surprise them to find that reasonable people understand the necessary dynamics of getting what they pay for, and are glad to do it. $250 zips of medical grade cannabis is a bargain. Even at $350 they are a great buy compared with dispensary or street prices. Patients are entitled to any or all of their crop only so long as they are willing to pay the cost of production. No patient is "entitled" to any of it free. There is not much of anything of value that I have acquired that did not have a cost.
I have given the stuff away in certain circumstances and deeply discounted in others, but that is the exception rather than the rule. There is always room for that, but I do not recommend that breaks be given lightly, and only in special circumstances, if at all.
In regard to the initial post, this sounds like a fucked up deal already. To agree to those terms, which are already too far outside reasonable norms, is to open yourself up to a creative schemer, and the odds that you will be scammed are likely. There have been many instances of this, where caregivers do not come through with their end of the bargain, but make excuses when time comes to provide free cannabis.
The notion that what growers receive in compensation is a donation is strange. It is a sale. The Supreme Court ruled that sales are permitted between patients and their respective caregivers, and that transactions cannot occur outside that relationship. Even before the ruling there was nothing to require that payment for production be considered a donation. Can anyone explain this "donation" meme to me? Where did that come from?
If you can't afford to grow it, you can't afford to buy it. Family and close friends as caregivers can be a source of free dope, but that is not to say they must bear the cost unless they agree. Patients who try to manipulate caregivers into giving away what they put earnest resources into are dishonest. If, on the other hand, someone has a gratuitous personal need to feel warm and fuzzy by giving it away, then by all means, knock yourself out. It might surprise them to find that reasonable people understand the necessary dynamics of getting what they pay for, and are glad to do it. $250 zips of medical grade cannabis is a bargain. Even at $350 they are a great buy compared with dispensary or street prices. Patients are entitled to any or all of their crop only so long as they are willing to pay the cost of production. No patient is "entitled" to any of it free. There is not much of anything of value that I have acquired that did not have a cost.
I have given the stuff away in certain circumstances and deeply discounted in others, but that is the exception rather than the rule. There is always room for that, but I do not recommend that breaks be given lightly, and only in special circumstances, if at all.
In regard to the initial post, this sounds like a fucked up deal already. To agree to those terms, which are already too far outside reasonable norms, is to open yourself up to a creative schemer, and the odds that you will be scammed are likely. There have been many instances of this, where caregivers do not come through with their end of the bargain, but make excuses when time comes to provide free cannabis.
Firstoffallen
Active Member
I think the grower needs to realize that its not giving anything away for free its giving meds in exchange for the rights to grow those meds. Just like the patient cant be greedy and needs to realize the time and effort and other cost of a grow factor in. 1oz for "free" is the best model ive seen.
slumdog80
Well-Known Member
Has anyone else heard of a transfer method were patient A. transfers say 1oz for 225$ to patient B. who then transfers
the cash and and say a joint back to patient A.? I saw something in the news were a lawyer was quoted saying that this
was technically legal. I would not, want to be the one that has to take this defense to court for the first time but, still
better then a straight donation.
the cash and and say a joint back to patient A.? I saw something in the news were a lawyer was quoted saying that this
was technically legal. I would not, want to be the one that has to take this defense to court for the first time but, still
better then a straight donation.
Cory and trevor
Well-Known Member
LOL the rights to grow LOL. I should pay my employer some money for the right to work for him too eh? I mean he is letting me work there for money, so why wouldn't I give him some money for letting me work for him seems legit and reasonable ROTFL beating the dead horse deader and deader every time I read these threads.