Lamp Luminous Flux(lm)?? The higher ther better or No?? Help if ya can

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
There is ONE AND ONLY case that lumens or other photometric units ,can be used to compare the real radiometric power of two light sources ...
Not to measure ..Just compare ....

THEY MUST HAVE TOTALLY IDENTICAL SPECTRAL EMISSIONS .

At that case ,where the (white) light power is distributed along the visibe spectrum ,identically at both light sources ..
If one has 130 lm and the other 100 lm ...
Then yes ....
The first is more powerful and efficient .(<=if lights are of same wattage also ....)

Both radiometrically and photometrically wise ....

But only at that case ,Lumens can be used .....

Same leds ,but different chromaticity bins ?..
Forget it ....
 

RB1956

Member
Yes see that's what it was everything the same but different companies, color spectrums both digilux and epistar LED lights that's why I was confused everything the same but the lumans out put and it was a huge difference one was like 9500 and the other 17500 or something like that but big difference.. Thanks everyone
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
yeah yeah leds produce great numbers but small plants..period..when the insane pricing practices and some good penetration develops then will look again...until then glorified xmas lights for way more $ than they are worth

now if one has accurate spd info for the comparison of units then ftc can be used in determining efficiency of the source...if you understand the spd info that is
Well ,it's kinda more complicated than you imply ....

Some help :
Spectral Power Distribution of a CIE D-Illuminant

The relative spectral power distribution of a CIE D-Illuminant is computed from its chromaticity coordinates. (The chromaticity coordinates may be computed from the correlated color temperature as described here.)

where:

The S[SUB]n[/SUB](&#955;) distributions are provided as a spreadsheet in ZIP or SIT format.
You can use the CIE Spectral Display Calculator to see plots of the D-Illuminant curve at any temperature.
Implementation Notes:

  1. This equation is often used in a relative form, normalizing so that S[SUB]D[/SUB](&#955;) is 100 or 1.0 at &#955; = 560 nm.

Spectral Power Distribution of a Blackbody Radiator

The spectral power distribution of a blackbody radiator is a function of wavelength &#955; (in meters) and temperature T (in kelvin). This function is described by Planck's formula:

where:

You can use the CIE Spectral Display Calculator to see plots of the blackbody curve at any temperature.
Implementation Notes:

  1. This equation is often used in a relative form, normalizing so that M[SUB]e[/SUB] is 100 or 1.0 at &#955; = 560 nm.



http://www.brucelindbloom.com/




And ......


http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch02.html
http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch06.html
http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch07.html
https://www.rollitup.org/led-other-lighting/646614-white-led-thermal-analysis-radiometric.html


As for the prices,"penetration" (<=another popular fancy myth ,here ! ) and the rest ,soon
enough you and many others sharing same thoughts /opinions ,
will be in the embarrassing position to reconsider some things ...

I,personally ,amongst many other fanatic led growers , DIYrs and designers ,guarantee you that .

Soon,enough .
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Yes mr lighting engineer. But it's not necessary to know All that to chose proper grow lighting. You earned your degree well.
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Well ,it's kinda more complicated than you imply ....

Some help :
Spectral Power Distribution of a CIE D-Illuminant

The relative spectral power distribution of a CIE D-Illuminant is computed from its chromaticity coordinates. (The chromaticity coordinates may be computed from the correlated color temperature as described here.)

where:

The S[SUB]n[/SUB](&#955;) distributions are provided as a spreadsheet in ZIP or SIT format.
You can use the CIE Spectral Display Calculator to see plots of the D-Illuminant curve at any temperature.
Implementation Notes:

  1. This equation is often used in a relative form, normalizing so that S[SUB]D[/SUB](&#955;) is 100 or 1.0 at &#955; = 560 nm.

Spectral Power Distribution of a Blackbody Radiator

The spectral power distribution of a blackbody radiator is a function of wavelength &#955; (in meters) and temperature T (in kelvin). This function is described by Planck's formula:

where:

You can use the CIE Spectral Display Calculator to see plots of the blackbody curve at any temperature.
Implementation Notes:

  1. This equation is often used in a relative form, normalizing so that M[SUB]e[/SUB] is 100 or 1.0 at &#955; = 560 nm.



http://www.brucelindbloom.com/




And ......


http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch02.html
http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch06.html
http://www.dfisica.ubi.pt/~hgil/FotoMetria/HandBook/ch07.html
https://www.rollitup.org/led-other-lighting/646614-white-led-thermal-analysis-radiometric.html


As for the prices,"penetration" (<=another popular fancy myth ,here ! ) and the rest ,soon
enough you and many others sharing same thoughts /opinions ,
will be in the embarrassing position to reconsider some things ...

I,personally ,amongst many other fanatic led growers , DIErs and designers ,guarantee you that .

Soon,enough .
Never said it wouldn't get there only that it isn't. Soon huh? You have been stating such for MANY years now.
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
Ok ...
Feel free ,to reveal to stupid me ,the simple criteria one has to know ,to pick / choose a proper grow light ....

Caution : I've been experimenting and cultivating with all sorts of light.....
Even with uncollimated laser beams ... (only Sulphur Plasma and couple more ways ,are missing from list ) ..
I'm really eager to learn something new ....
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
Join Date
Sep 2012
Today's date : 16/May/2013 .....


"MANY years,now ",actually , is a bit less than 8 full months ...
Anyway ...time is a relative thing .....

It took me some thousands of years ,to find out .....
And plenty of weed ....

So ...
Soon enough ,yes ....
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Ok ...
Feel free ,to reveal to stupid me ,the simple criteria one has to know ,to pick / choose a proper grow light ....

Caution : I've been experimenting and cultivating with all sorts of light.....
Even with uncollimated laser beams ... (only Sulphur Plasma and couple more ways ,are missing from list ) ..
I'm really eager to learn something new ....


And I never stated nor implied that you were stupid
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
Today's date : 16/May/2013 .....


"MANY years,now ",actually , is a bit less than 8 full months ...
Anyway ...time is a relative thing .....

It took me some thousands of years ,to find out .....
And plenty of weed ....

So ...
Soon enough ,yes ....
I sure hope you are correct... I can't wait til I can go get a 400 watt source that will outperform 1200 watt hid effectively for 3 foot of plants height for $200....And I messed up...you and people of your mindset have been saying this for over 10 years now and STILL I WAIT
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
'Common sense' ,probably says "Dude ,get your plants outside ,under the sun " ....
But that's another issue ...
Common Sense ,unfortunately can't help you to be 100% sure about almost anything ....

...Even for a glass half filled with water ...

...Half people's common sense will say "it's half empty " ..
From the other remain half of people ,common sense will say "No ,it's half -full " ....

So ...Same thing with light ...
Common sense will say ,choose the most bright ....

But plants do not photosynthesize using your eyes .....

Common Sense ,brother !
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
In case you think me dumb I use cmh lighting as my primary source and its spd is quite nice

I have more than eyes...meters for blue, red, ftc, and uvb which I also implement

But the best indicator of all are the plants and their test results
 

FranJan

Well-Known Member
Sorry SDS, but, uhmm, what were we talkin about? I have a tendency not to listen to people who like to talk at others. What was the point of all that again?
 

Kite High

Well-Known Member
'Common sense' ,probably says "Dude ,get your plants outside ,under the sun " ....
But that's another issue ...
Common Sense ,unfortunately can't help you to be 100% sure about almost anything ....

...Even for a glass half filled with water ...

...Half people's common sense will say "it's half empty " ..
From the other remain half of people ,common sense will say "No ,it's half -full " ....

So ...Same thing with light ...
Common sense will say ,choose the most bright ....

But plants do not photosynthesize using your eyes .....

Common Sense ,brother !
"Do what thou Wilt" brother...OTO
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
I sure hope you are correct... I can't wait til I can go get a 400 watt source that will outperform 1200 watt hid effectively for 3 foot of plants height for $200....And I messed up...you and people of your mindset have been saying this for over 10 years now and STILL I WAIT

400 W to outperform a 1200 Watt Hid ?

Like a 1200 cc Fiat Punto Turbo outperforms a 4700cc Ford Mustang GT ?

Difficult right now ....
300 Watt Led = 600 Watt HiD ,is more "up-to-date" goal ....
Let us do not rush into future ....
-----------------------------------------------------
3 foot plants ...?
That is doable already .....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For $200 ?

Exactly what you buy for 200$ to make a HID system ?

You can find leds with $200 as you can find Digital HID ballasts with $500 and reflectors costing more than $1000...
It's a matter of system's quality ....
A high- quality led system is by far cheaper to purchase ,than a high-quality HID system .....


Dunno for others ...I never tried to grow with epoxy leds ..
I'm not THAT stupid .....
I'm into growing with high-power leds for less than 2 years .....
Less than a year, I've been into led panel designing & building ..
So ..
I'm pretty " newbie " .....

But ... a "promising " one ,I guess .....
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
Sorry SDS, but, uhmm, what were we talkin about? I have a tendency not to listen to people who like to talk at others. What was the point of all that again?

About lumens ,if I remember correctly ...
And if that photometric unit can be a "tool" or no ,for the grower (led or no ) ...
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
In case you think me dumb I use cmh lighting as my primary source and its spd is quite nice

I have more than eyes...meters for blue, red, ftc, and uvb which I also implement

But the best indicator of all are the plants and their test results
Never spend time & energy ,to think if someone is dumb or no ....
Can be without that ' luxury ' ...


Of course plants grow good under MH ....
FG'sS ,during the '70's ,people used Mercury Vapor to grow ,with quite good results ...

Imagine with MH or HPS ....

Or even better ,with continuously advancing & evolving modern high power leds ....

Modern Man would have not bitten the Apple ...
Pizzas are already on the way ....
 

FranJan

Well-Known Member
Cool. Now I noticed they do measure LEDs in lumens, and I do see colored LEDs measured in both lumens and CRIs, (whatever LOL), because that's what the industry uses and they don't care what we're using the LEDs for per se, they're just trying to give panel makers/dealers/us some kind of standards to use, (the wonderful thing about standards is there are so many to choose from :), I forgot who said that), so my question SDS; is there a situation when looking at a panel's performance to grow can be perceived by using photometric units? I would think there is, like cooling performance at the junction temple to see if the LEDs is running to spec by using a luxmeter program on your phone. Maybe not the best way (or example), but is it a way? (Rhetorical Alert!) You can't completely belittle lumens for the simple reason we're stuck with them. Sure you can prove situations where it fails, now do the world a favor and prove that they can be used, at least in a few situations, just to make someone's choice a bit easier. Make a lot of people very happy if you could boil it all down to something more manageable with the info of what the average grower is given.

To me a LED panel is a system, not just a light. You need all the tools you can get to look at all it's parts. Right? So basically my point was/is, and without going to the end's of the internet to prove it, lumens mean something to a grower. That's all I'm sayin. Did we really NEED a retort from you after? And in essay form. Are you that insecure? You know, people will ask questions if you let them and that will help them understand what you're sayin and help to you prove your point. Not brow-beating them with data, which is also my other point. You can keep shouting at everyone and answering people's questions like they're stupid and be ignored by many people or you could calm down, come down off your soapbox, and get with the community. I'm sorry, SDS but you don't know it all. Want to know why I know that? I grow plenty of great weed without ever have listened to a word you say about growing with LEDs. Later.
 

stardustsailor

Well-Known Member
Cool. Now I noticed they do measure LEDs in lumens, and I do see colored LEDs measured in both lumens and CRIs, (whatever LOL),
A link maybe ? I would like to see which led manufacturer does that ..
CRI figures for monochromatic leds ?
Lumens for blue & red leds ?
Link ,please ....
And I hope ,is not going to be an Asian led maker .....

because that's what the industry uses and they don't care what we're using the LEDs for per se, they're just trying to give panel makers/dealers/us some kind of standards to use, (the wonderful thing about standards is there are so many to choose from :smile:, I forgot who said that), so my question SDS; is there a situation when looking at a panel's performance to grow can be perceived by using photometric units?
I've already answered to that question .Only one case .

I would think there is, like cooling performance at the junction temple to see if the LEDs is running to spec by using a luxmeter program on your phone.
Have you ever tried that ?
Are you aware that leds need special measuring equipment far more advanced than your joke-of-luxmeter phone software ?
There is another more accurate way ,to do what you describe ,by just using a fast-reading polymeter/voltmeter ....

Maybe not the best way (or example), but is it a way? (Rhetorical Alert!) You can't completely belittle lumens for the simple reason we're stuck with them.
WoW! So that's it ! 'Cause we're stuck ,we 've to use lumens ,huh ?
Well,by all means ,go on doing so ....If it makes you happier .....
It does not mean ,that it is the right way though ....


Sure you can prove situations where it fails, now do the world a favor and prove that they can be used, at least in a few situations, just to make someone's choice a bit easier. Make a lot of people very happy if you could boil it all down to something more manageable with the info of what the average grower is given.
I feel very sorry,but I can't .My powers are limited to learning the Laws of Physics and apply them to my builds -designs .
I can not re-write or even manipulate ,the universal laws of physics .

To me a LED panel is a system, not just a light. You need all the tools you can get to look at all it's parts. Right? So basically my point was/is, and without going to the end's of the internet to prove it, lumens mean something to a grower.
Yes ,lumens mean something to a grower ...Absolutely Sh!t ......No more-no less ....


That's all I'm sayin. Did we really NEED a retort from you after? And in essay form.
For you ,I do not see that it was useful .Probably nothing can be done about your case ...
For others I don't know ...Neither you do ....

Are you that insecure?
About what ?
And if I'm ,why you care so much ?
Are you willing to comfort me ?

You know, people will ask questions if you let them and that will help them understand what you're sayin and help to you prove your point.
Well yes ..Usually that's how it starts ....


Not brow-beating them with data, which is also my other point.
Sh!t ..I always thought that this is the most scientific way to back-up / give proof about any sort of " claims " ...
Just suggest me ,another way ,please .....

You can keep shouting at everyone and answering people's questions like they're stupid and be ignored by many people or you could calm down, come down off your soapbox, and get with the community.
Well ,maybe I'm a smart-ass ....
But for sure,I'm more than clever, from people who used to claim :

-You can't grow with cheap asian leds
-You can't grow with white leds
-You can't grow with wide angle lens
-You can't grow without blue leds
-You can't grow with 1 Watter leds
-You can't grow with green light

To mention just a few .......

So ..Let me be in my "soapbox" ,please .....
At least there ,is Truth ,ruling things ....



I'm sorry, SDS but you don't know it all. Want to know why I know that? I grow plenty of great weed without ever have listened to a word you say about growing with LEDs. Later.
Yes ....
As also they are people ,who listened to me and grow better than you ....
Or you are so naive ,to think ,that is because ,of what you trust and believe as true ,makes you a good grower ?
Still ,growing good weed ,has nothing to do with lumens as a useful unit or no ....
It takes whole lot more than that ,to grow weed....

But since you want to measure who has it " larger " ....

Ok .....

Our grows will 'talk' ,by themselves ,Mr "Later " ...

And pay some attention now : "Later " can be " Too late " for ya !

And you know why ?

'Cause you're "satisfied" with what you have and do not care about any advancement or evolution .....

Fran ...You can't teach an old dog ,new tricks .....

Just go back in your dog house and stop barking ...

Chew on to your so beloved " photometric lumens and your great weed " ,steak- bone ....

Others we have the right ,to search deeper ,and inform everybody else ,about our findings ....


Even if that makes some people ,feel really stupid ...

Or makes them loose profit ....



C'est la vie ....
 

chazbolin

Well-Known Member
SDS you take this subject on exquisitely by doling out the science that supports the physics of light as electromagnetic radiant energy and you do a wonderful job of statistically correlating that energy to plant photobiology. I commend your patience as I think you handle the topic deftly albeit with a decidedly SSL bias. But nonetheless the community is better for it as you impart what should be at least recognized by any grower reading this, it is information that distinguishes the differences between plant and visual lighting. Without that acknowledgment and/or at least the the opportunity to question the visual data given by lighting manufacturers most growers would determine what light to use based on the lamps kelvin rating or the highest number given in values such as luminous flux and lumens.

Light is a complex topic and while your answers tend to require the average reader to go well beyond their capabilities it is information that when broken down makes sense. I don't see it as pontificating or your being on a soap box. People will take from it what they can or ignore it entirely if it's over their heads. But it's there and you are to be thanked for sharing this information.

And if I may reference your previous car analogies, we don't use a thermometer to measure how many liters of fuel we put in our car. I'll get the temperature of the fuel and I with that information I may successfully make it from say Hanover to Kiel but it won't be because I knew the temperature of the fuel going into the tank. You got to Kiel because you had enough fuel to get you there. Pointing to a value that had little to no relevance in accomplishing that trip would be akin to stating your grow was successful because your light produces a higher lumen/watt. A luxometer would be the thermometer of plant lighting meters as they are designed to provide data falling within human visual responses which, like the temperature of my fuel, is not correlative to plant absorption and action spectra.

Ultimately the plants speak for themselves. Repeatability of techniques that prove successful is what makes growing your own, whatever the crop, rewarding. With lighting being a key element in that equation it is incumbent upon the grower who wishes to optimize quality/yield while reducing operational costs to have the most factually accurate data that will allow them to build upon past success.
 
Top