Samesies<3i love you
Samesies<3i love you
Sexual assault is a very serious crime to accuse somebody of. Unfortunately the laws aren't based on personal feelings or your interpretation at that moment in time. The legitimacy of the crime that took place is of the utmost importance. We are innocent until proven guilty in society these days. But hey, this is an internet forum, not a court of law. And I have a 16 inch penis.Even in an anonymous forum "legitimacy" is questioned.
Case in point why this is such an under reported crime.
End of experiment.
Number | False reporting rate (%) | |
---|---|---|
Theilade and Thomsen (1986) | 1 out of 56 4 out of 39 | 1.5% (minimum) 10% (maximum) |
New York Rape Squad (1974) | n/a | 2% |
Hursch and Selkin (1974) | 10 out of 545 | 2% |
Kelly et al. (2005) | 67 out of 2,643 | 3% ("possible" and "probable" false allegations) 22% (recorded by police as "no-crime") |
Geis (197 | n/a | 3–31% (estimates given by police surgeons) |
Smith (1989) | 17 out of 447 | 3.8% |
U.S. Department of Justice (1997) | n/a | 8% |
Clark and Lewis (1977) | 12 out of 116 | 10.3% |
Harris and Grace (1999) | 53 out of 483 123 out of 483 | 10.9% ("false/malicious" claims) 25% (recorded by police as "no-crime") |
Lea et al. (2003) | 42 out of 379 | 11% |
HMCPSI/HMIC (2002) | 164 out of 1,379 | 11.8% |
McCahill et al. (1979) | 218 out of 1,198 | 18.2% |
Philadelphia police study (196 | 74 out of 370 | 20% |
Chambers and Millar (1983) | 44 out of 196 | 22.4% |
Grace et al. (1992) | 80 out of 335 | 24% |
Jordan (2004) | 68 out of 164 62 out of 164 | 41% ("false" claims) 38% (viewed by police as "possibly true/possibly false") |
Kanin (1994) | 45 out of 109 | 41% |
Gregory and Lees (1996) | 49 out of 109 | 45% |
Maclean (1979) | 16 out of 34 | 47% |
Stewart (1981) | 16 out of 18 | 90% |
The original question had nothing to do with legitimacy:Sexual assault is a very serious crime to accuse somebody of. Unfortunately the laws aren't based on personal feelings or your interpretation at that moment in time. The legitimacy of the crime that took place is of the utmost importance. We are innocent until proven guilty in society these days. But hey, this is an internet forum, not a court of law. And I have a 16 inch penis.
Specifically regarding sexual situations, for example, have you ever been in a situation where you felt like you either couldn't say no directly, or if you did, it wouldn't make a difference? Have you ever felt scared in a situation with someone you previously trusted?
I've been reading a bit about statistics of sexual assault and was curious about any real life, first hand accounts.
Interestingly enough, female sexual assault victims make up somewhere around 70% of cases in the US, but males are still the majority because of the sexual assaults that take place in prison.
And YOU'RE a MOD?Most ordinary people don't know the legal definition of sexual assault verbatim, they have a vague understanding of it and different people define it their own way based on their own experiences, situations and even genders like my previous example; a drunk girl kisses me - not seen as sexual assault, I drunkenly kiss a girl - definitely sexual assault.
I would suggest you don't take offense to a legitimate question next time
You know that's one huge reason I didn't want to post in this thread. This is classic trollery, asking the disingenuous offensive question with sincerity then when people answer pit the sides against each other using known conflagration points in said topic. We call a lot of the young bucks around here trolls. But this is the first actual troll I've seen on here.And YOU'RE a MOD?
You set a poor example on a site where it strives to set itself apart from the others when it comes to trolling efforts..you can try to backpedal all you want however, the community can read between your LECHEROUS lines..you fool no one.
ROFLMAO!! See pretty good for a baby troll. I asked you questions on your process and you go back to pouring gasoline.Well I certainly hope you never find yourself in a situation where you have to report a sexual assault to a police officer, because that will indeed be one of the first things he asks you.
Are you going to tell the officer he's trolling for doing his job?
Are we to accept every single persons word as evidence of a sexual assault?
I mean, after all, we know nobody ever reports false information (post #83), nope, never, they never do that..
He's an embarrassment to this site and Rollie should take note..You know that's one huge reason I didn't want to post in this thread. This is classic trollery, asking the disingenuous offensive question with sincerity then when people answer pit the sides against each other using known conflagration points in said topic. We call a lot of the young bucks around here trolls. But this is the first actual troll I've seen on here.
I'd give his troll game a B- or C+. Where this troll repetitively fails is you have to keep your gambit consistent. If your schtick is sincere and naive you can't then whack someone with a polo mallet. But sadly I'm sure his style will improve since he seems to have an unlimited playing field ::shrug::.
So yes I completely agree and I had intended to put aforementioned troll on ignore. But LOL software comes to the fail, "Sorry Padawanbater2 is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her." Almost as convenient as if it were planned, ahhh synchronicity.
you know I love you but I have to clear the air about mods and mods abilities . we get shit on a lot on this website it comes with the job but mods just are here to delete spam, they are allowed to have an opinion and thoughts, and sometimes those thoughts aren't going to sparkle with everyone, (while personally I understand this is a touchy subject and I feel so horrible for anyone whos ever been sexually assaulted ) I just have to state that mods literally just delete spam,.. admins or global mods do more but pada is just a plain mod, and has always imho asked touchy subject cases , hes a little curious and comes off abrasive but ya anywho just wanted to let you know what mods doYou know that's one huge reason I didn't want to post in this thread. This is classic trollery, asking the disingenuous offensive question with sincerity then when people answer pit the sides against each other using known conflagration points in said topic. We call a lot of the young bucks around here trolls. But this is the first actual troll I've seen on here.
I'd give his troll game a B- or C+. Where this troll repetitively fails is you have to keep your gambit consistent. If your schtick is sincere and naive you can't then whack someone with a polo mallet. But sadly I'm sure his style will improve since he seems to have an unlimited playing field ::shrug::.
So yes I completely agree and I had intended to put aforementioned troll on ignore. But LOL software comes to the fail, "Sorry Padawanbater2 is a moderator/admin and you are not allowed to ignore him or her." Almost as convenient as if it were planned, ahhh synchronicity.
Inquisitive nature my ass..he's looking to do EXACTLY what curious and other RESPECTED members say..trolling to the nth degree:you know I love you but I have to clear the air about mods and mods abilities . we get shit on a lot on this website it comes with the job but mods just are here to delete spam, they are allowed to have an opinion and thoughts, and sometimes those thoughts aren't going to sparkle with everyone, (while personally I understand this is a touchy subject and I feel so horrible for anyone whos ever been sexually assaulted ) I just have to state that mods literally just delete spam,.. admins or global mods do more but pada is just a plain mod, and has always imho asked touchy subject cases , hes a little curious and comes off abrasive but ya anywho just wanted to let you know what mods do
This could be interesting...
First question;
Have you ever attempted/succeeded fucking something other than a person? Fruit, couch, sock, etc.
Correction, you are. I'm sorry this topic upset you, don't reply to it. Simple. Instead you come here running your mouth. That's literally all I've ever seen you do, is preach your opinion over others in hopes you will be heard.He's an embarrassment to this site and Rollie should take note..
If you don't like my posts don't read them..Correction, you are. I'm sorry this topic upset you, don't reply to it. Simple. Instead you come here running your mouth. That's literally all I've ever seen you do, is preach your opinion over others in hopes you will be heard.
I hate to break it to you, but this forum is for adults, by adults. Also, it's on the INTERNETSOMGWTF!!! So if you don't like it, leave. Until then shut the fuck up with your constant bitching. It's all you seem to be good at. I don't care if you have a valid opinion, it's exactly that, an opinion. Just like this topic is a curious question. You know what else is also disrespectful? Talk of suicide, murder, animal abuse, bigotry, racism and name calling. Guess what? It's joked about everyday here. Does your fat fucking mouth go off then? Didn't think so. Chill out or log off. Simple choices in life you do not seem to grasp.
No also means try harder.
EDIT: And those respected members you speak of? Most aren't respected. They are also trolls. Everyone does it. Even you. Look at you go. Look up the definition of trolling while you're at it. Kthanxbai.
Same goes for you^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^baaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
[video=youtube;Z4sKg18lTqw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4sKg18lTqw[/video]
So what's the difference between a police officer asking you if a sexual assault was legitimate and me asking you?If you don't like my posts don't read them..
Dude..go back to writing code for some cheap ass American businessman in that sweat box you call a country..and fap over girls pics from the PIC OF YOURSELF thread.Well I certainly hope you never find yourself in a situation where you have to report a sexual assault to a police officer, because that will indeed be one of the first things he asks you.
Are you going to tell the officer he's trolling for doing his job?
Are we to accept every single persons word as evidence of a sexual assault?
I mean, after all, we know nobody ever reports false information (post #83), nope, never, they never do that..
You can basically taste the redundancy. If you don't like this thread then don't reply.If you don't like my posts don't read them..
The weak minded resort to personal attacks. Just goes to show you never had a leg to stand on.Dude..go back to writing code for some cheap ass American businessman in that sweat box you call a country..and fap over girls pics from the PIC OF YOURSELF thread.