Do you think a (one world) ONLINE GOVERNMENT is a good idea?
- Thread starter Nevaeh420
- Start date
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I think it's an absolutely awful idea. There is no way/provision to/for weight[ing] a voice for possessing a vestigial clue. cn
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Yes. Politics are inherently corrupt imo. However going to a system such as you espouse is the extreme in corruptibility, also imo. What we have is bad. Going to a plebiscite system like that is way worse ...imo of course. Consider the recent "California Prop 35" plebiscite. 6 out of 7 people voted FOR an unregulated increase in police forfeiture (fools.) because they didn't read the text and were put off by the propositin's sponsors sponsors. THIS would be our future in the hands of manipulators who would be excused from trying as hard as they do now. cn
Doer
Well-Known Member
World? No pro there. All con
On line? No pro there. All con
Govt? No pro there. All con
So, All Con. The entire idea is a conniving confidence scheme to corn hole America.
Why should we let the world vote for our self rule ambitions? (it ain't workin')
Oh, but it is.
Nevaeh420
Well-Known Member
So you would rather see the politicians rule the world instead of the people?
It would be cool though if there was a test online government for a state or a small country or some body of people to test it on! I wonder how it would work out for them over time?
~PEACE~
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I would be curious to know how such a community would do with, say, Iraq as a neighbor. cn
I think they make an equalizer for that.
Doer
Well-Known Member
See if you think there is a difference, is why this won't work. I said WE the People will rule this world if WE have our Way.
Politicians are not a master race, nor are they some Beta race.
So, they are not different from People. Not in this Country, iac. Its straw dog argument. You cannot even understand you are making no sense.
We have to have governance. We have to make good and open choices about that and within the Rule of Law. Don't you see we are still fighting about what Law will rule this world? Can we rule ourselves or will religion rule us?
1) Secular elected lawmakers, held to some account. It is a secret accounting among themselves. The elected use makers of Capital Standing but not money, it is how much you can trade away for your vote and still bring home the bacon. Self Rule. It is quite possible if circumstances change to throw out most of the Congress every 2 years. We already have online govt website open and transparent process here and it sucks. It is the vehicle for lies only. It that what you want?
2) Islamist or Hindu or Christian non-secluar rule.
Two choices and only 2 choices. And to me there never was more than 2 choices, because for all human history, crazy woo-woo Shamans have ruled. Finally 2 choices but still we fight.
Now we fight Sharia Gestapo about is self rule to be allowed in this world.
Would you like that?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Do you think a mob democracy can even organize an army, let alone hold an edge in weapons research? cn