theloadeddragon
Well-Known Member
wouldnt it be some crazy shit if people grew babies in our hair, and released pollen kinda like pot plants??? random pollen hits us and Wham, we are having babies? lol
Club 600
- Thread starter DST
- Start date
jimmer6577
Well-Known Member
That is the one. Here is the 1 I have left inside with many outside.Is it GHS kalashnikova? I Love it.. I only harvested 60g wet off mine.. Super runt. The smoke is great though. Crystal production is insane also. Got one more going... Like to hear how that worm piss works for ya.
Whodat I've actually have seen videos and knew about composting using worms and collecting the tea but never thought about it being reversed to farm worms for other purposes. And when I first mentioned it I didn't even think of it being basicly the drip pan droppings which in turn would be the tea if you were doing it for compost over for worms. I use teas outside now. I have a 2 30gallon garbage cans I fill with water and a bag of seaweed and crestacians compost. And this is what I water with when I need to for my outside plants. Cheap and very effective. As long as I stir it every day or so it stays ok. But I think the stirring action adds the oxygen needed to keep it from spoiling per say. I'd like to hear you're input on this since you seam to be on point. I started this last year when I could spend more time with my babies on the property. And yes that's unpurged bho. My first try. I do love the bubble hash though.
method2mymadness
Well-Known Member
U must be baked lol
genuity
Well-Known Member
hahahah,that is some high shit....but good. it would be crazy tho,just shake your head at the best(looks/brain/life/boob set/ect) female,and bam..got you some lil banditos>>>Spanish speaking women,here I come.
whodatnation
Well-Known Member
So protection would be a shower cap type of deal? Mosh pits would be even grosser.... Yeah Im gonna go and try to get on your level TLD.
whodatnation
Well-Known Member
Hey jimm, thats how people have been making compost tea for a long time... I trained my donkeys to make it for me,,, I'll explain later, with a picture... AACT is a whole nother ball game 
(actively aerated compost tea with the addition of blackstrap molasses.)
(actively aerated compost tea with the addition of blackstrap molasses.)
cannabiscult
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube_share;jT00kOrKdmo]http://youtu.be/jT00kOrKdmo[/video]
whodatnation
Well-Known Member
I wasn't aware that I was confused??? Now Im confused... 
Havn't looked yet, but Just from the cover pic I know its awesome Good to see you again canna 
Havn't looked yet, but Just from the cover pic I know its awesome
Good to see you again canna
cannabiscult
Well-Known Member
there ya go now youve got it!
cannabiscult
Well-Known Member
i posted it in here despite only running 1 600 lol
cannabiscult
Well-Known Member
yall are family thats really why im in here
Javadog
Well-Known Member
LOL. This reminds me of when my little guy was very young.
He went through a period when he did not seem to eat, but he
kept growing. His hair was curly and getting long and I joked
that he was feeding like an anenome.
Onward and upward,
JD
theloadeddragon
Well-Known Member
Man that is such an involved concept it involves an entire world for it, like harry potter, or Lord of the Rings..... Males, females, and hermies... when people get stressed they pop banana cocks out of their hair and spew gizm dust into the air, ejaculating as their cock/nanners waive in the air, meanwhile you see this Firey hot bleach blonde/redhead just down the road stop midstep and her hair get coated in this green gizm powder, and her hair turns brownish redish, and her hair curls start to swell as naked babies begin developing.... only to weigh her down so much her hair starts falling out and she starts dropping babies every where she goes!!!
Seasonal thing of course, but not everywhere.... maybe blacks are Indicas, Whites, Sativas... and Indian/Asian are the rhuderalis, everything else is a cross breed.... and now through world wild crossing we have a cesspool of genetics, crossing daily and the possibilities are endless... we are seeing mutations, variations.... and some downright stinky ass people walking around.
Seasonal thing of course, but not everywhere.... maybe blacks are Indicas, Whites, Sativas... and Indian/Asian are the rhuderalis, everything else is a cross breed.... and now through world wild crossing we have a cesspool of genetics, crossing daily and the possibilities are endless... we are seeing mutations, variations.... and some downright stinky ass people walking around.
method2mymadness
Well-Known Member
Now I know ur high
method2mymadness
Well-Known Member
Hey jig speaking of my little dirtbikin devil her she is in daddy's helmet she dam near wanted to wear it all.day
Attachments
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
Marijuana's march toward mainstream confounds feds
AP Photo: Damian Dovarganes
In just a few short years, public opinion has shifted dramatically toward pragmatic acceptance of marijuana.
Public opinion has moved dramatically toward general acceptance of marijuana even if the federal government has yet to catch up.
In just a few short years, public opinion has shifted dramatically toward pragmatic acceptance of marijuana.
WASHINGTON It took 50 years for American attitudes about marijuana to zigzag from the paranoia of "Reefer Madness" to the excesses of Woodstock back to the hard line of "Just Say No."
The next 25 years took the nation from Bill Clinton, who famously "didn't inhale," to Barack Obama, who most emphatically did.
Now, in just a few short years, public opinion has moved so dramatically toward general acceptance that even those who champion legalization are surprised at how quickly attitudes are changing and states are moving to approve the drug for medical use and just for fun.
It is a moment in the United States that is rife with contradictions:
Richard Bonnie, a University of Virginia law professor who worked for a national commission that recommended decriminalizing marijuana in 1972, sees the public taking a big leap from prohibition to a more laissez-faire approach without full deliberation.
"It's a remarkable story historically," he says. "But as a matter of public policy, it's a little worrisome."
More than a little worrisome to those in the anti-drug movement.
"We're on this hundred-mile-an-hour freight train to legalizing a third addictive substance," says Kevin Sabet, a former drug policy adviser in the Obama administration, lumping marijuana with tobacco and alcohol.
Legalization strategist Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, likes the direction the marijuana smoke is wafting. But he knows his side has considerable work yet to do.
"I'm constantly reminding my allies that marijuana is not going to legalize itself," he says.
BY THE NUMBERS
Eighteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes since California voters made the first move in 1996. Voters in Colorado and Washington state took the next step last year and approved pot for recreational use. Alaska is likely to vote on the same question in 2014, and a few other states are expected to put recreational use on the ballot in 2016.
Nearly half of adults have tried marijuana, 12 percent of them in the past year, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center.
Fifty-two percent of adults favor legalizing marijuana, up 11 percentage points just since 2010, according to Pew.
Sixty percent think Washington shouldn't enforce federal laws against marijuana in states that have approved its use.
STICKY ISSUES
Where California led the charge on medical marijuana, the next chapter in this story is being written in Colorado and Washington state.
Policymakers there are grappling with all sorts of sticky issues revolving around one central question: How do you legally regulate the production, distribution, sale and use of marijuana for recreational purposes when federal law bans all of the above?
The Justice Department began reviewing the matter after November's election. But seven months later, states still are on their own.
Both sides in the debate paid close attention when Obama said in December that "it does not make sense, from a prioritization point of view, for us to focus on recreational drug users in a state that has already said that under state law that's legal."
Rep. Jared Polis, a Colorado Democrat who favors legalization, predicts Washington will take a hands-off approach, based on Obama's comments. But he's quick to add, "We would like to see that in writing."
The federal government already has taken a similar approach toward users in states that have approved marijuana for medical use.
It doesn't go after pot-smoking cancer patients or grandmas with glaucoma. But it also has made clear that people who are in the business of growing, selling and distributing marijuana on a large scale are subject to potential prosecution for violations of the Controlled Substances Act even in states that have legalized medical use.
"A REGULATED SYSTEM"
There's a political calculus for the president, or any other politician, in all of this.
Younger people, who tend to vote more Democratic, are more supportive of legalizing marijuana, as are people in the West, where the libertarian streak runs strong.
Despite increasing public acceptance of marijuana overall, politicians know there are complications that could come with commercializing an addictive substance. Opponents of pot are particularly worried that legalization will result in increased use by young people.
Sabet frames the conundrum for Obama: "Do you want to be the president that stops a popular cause, especially a cause that's popular within your own party? Or do you want to be the president that enables youth drug use that will have ramifications down the road?"
Marijuana legalization advocates offer politicians a rosier scenario, in which legitimate pot businesses eager to keep their operating licenses make sure not to sell to minors.
"Having a regulated system is the only way to ensure that we're not ceding control of this popular substance to the criminal market and to black marketeers," says Aaron Smith, executive director of the National Cannabis Industry Association, a trade group for legal pot businesses in the United States.
COURSE CORRECTION
While the federal government hunkers down, Colorado and Washington state are moving forward on their own with regulations covering everything from how plants will be grown to how many stores will be allowed.
Tim Lynch, director of the libertarian Cato Institute's Project on Criminal Justice, predicts "the next few years are going to be messy" as states work to bring a black-market industry into the sunshine.
California's experience with medical marijuana offers a window into potential pitfalls that can come with wider availability of pot.
Dispensaries for medical marijuana have proliferated in the state, and regulation has been lax, prompting a number of cities around the state to ban dispensaries.
In May, the California Supreme Court ruled that cities and counties can ban medical marijuana dispensaries. A few weeks later, Los Angeles voters approved a ballot measure that limits the number of pot shops in the city to 135, down from an estimated high of about 1,000.
This isn't full-scale buyer's remorse, but more a course correction before the inevitable next push for full-on legalization in the state.
"A NEW INDUSTRY"
Growing support for legalization doesn't mean everybody wants to light up: Barely one in 10 Americans used pot in the past year.
Those who do want to see marijuana legalized range from libertarians who oppose much government intervention to people who want to see an activist government aggressively regulate marijuana production and sales.
For some, money talks: Why let drug cartels rake in untaxed profits when a cut could go into government coffers?
There are other threads in the growing acceptance of pot.
People think it's not as dangerous as once believed. They worry about high school youths getting an arrest record. They see racial inequity in the way marijuana laws are enforced. They're weary of the "war on drugs."
Opponents counter with a 2012 study finding that regular use of marijuana during teen years can lead to a long-term drop in IQ, and another study indicating marijuana use can induce and exacerbate psychotic illness in susceptible people. They question the notion that regulating pot will bring in big money, saying revenue estimates are grossly exaggerated.
They reject the claim that prisons are bulging with people convicted of simple possession by citing federal statistics showing only a small percentage of federal and state inmates are behind bars for that alone.
They warn that baby boomers who draw on their own innocuous experiences with pot are overlooking the much higher potency of today's marijuana.
In 2009, concentrations of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in pot, averaged close to 10 percent in marijuana, compared with about 4 percent in the 1980s, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
"If marijuana legalization was about my old buddies at Berkeley smoking in People's Park once a week, I don't think many of us would care that much," says Sabet, who helped to found Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a group that opposes legalization. "It's really about creating a new industry that's going to target kids and target minorities and our vulnerable populations just like our legal industries do today."
WHAT'S NEXT?
So how bad, or good, is pot?
J. Michael Bostwick, a psychiatrist at the Mayo Clinic, set out to sort through more than 100 sometimes conflicting studies after his teenage son became addicted to pot, and turned his findings into a 22-page article for Mayo Clinic Proceedings in 2012.
For all the talk that smoking pot is no big deal, Bostwick says, he determined that "it was a very big deal. There were addiction issues. There were psychosis issues.
"But there was also this very large body of literature suggesting that it could potentially have very valuable pharmaceutical applications, but the research was stymied" by federal barriers.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse says research is ongoing.
Dr. Nora Volkow, the institute's director, worries that legalizing pot will result in increased use of marijuana by young people and impair their brain development.
"Think about it: Do you want a nation where your young people are stoned?" she asks.
Partisans on both sides think people in other states will keep a close eye on Colorado and Washington as they decide what happens next.
But past predictions on pot have been wildly off base.
"Reefer Madness," the 1936 propaganda movie that pot fans turned into a cult classic in the 1970s, spins a tale of dire consequences "ending often in incurable insanity."
Associated Press writers Kristen Wyatt in Denver, Gene Johnson in Seattle, Lauran Neergaard in Washington, D.C., and AP researcher Monika Mathur in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report. .............................cof
AP Photo: Damian Dovarganes
In just a few short years, public opinion has shifted dramatically toward pragmatic acceptance of marijuana.
Public opinion has moved dramatically toward general acceptance of marijuana even if the federal government has yet to catch up.
In just a few short years, public opinion has shifted dramatically toward pragmatic acceptance of marijuana.
WASHINGTON It took 50 years for American attitudes about marijuana to zigzag from the paranoia of "Reefer Madness" to the excesses of Woodstock back to the hard line of "Just Say No."
The next 25 years took the nation from Bill Clinton, who famously "didn't inhale," to Barack Obama, who most emphatically did.
Now, in just a few short years, public opinion has moved so dramatically toward general acceptance that even those who champion legalization are surprised at how quickly attitudes are changing and states are moving to approve the drug for medical use and just for fun.
It is a moment in the United States that is rife with contradictions:
- People are looking more kindly on marijuana even as science reveals more about the drug's potential dangers, particularly for young people.
- States are giving the green light to the drug in direct defiance of a federal prohibition on its use.
- Exploration of the potential medical benefit is limited by high federal hurdles to research.
Richard Bonnie, a University of Virginia law professor who worked for a national commission that recommended decriminalizing marijuana in 1972, sees the public taking a big leap from prohibition to a more laissez-faire approach without full deliberation.
"It's a remarkable story historically," he says. "But as a matter of public policy, it's a little worrisome."
More than a little worrisome to those in the anti-drug movement.
"We're on this hundred-mile-an-hour freight train to legalizing a third addictive substance," says Kevin Sabet, a former drug policy adviser in the Obama administration, lumping marijuana with tobacco and alcohol.
Legalization strategist Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, likes the direction the marijuana smoke is wafting. But he knows his side has considerable work yet to do.
"I'm constantly reminding my allies that marijuana is not going to legalize itself," he says.
BY THE NUMBERS
Eighteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes since California voters made the first move in 1996. Voters in Colorado and Washington state took the next step last year and approved pot for recreational use. Alaska is likely to vote on the same question in 2014, and a few other states are expected to put recreational use on the ballot in 2016.
Nearly half of adults have tried marijuana, 12 percent of them in the past year, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center.
Fifty-two percent of adults favor legalizing marijuana, up 11 percentage points just since 2010, according to Pew.
Sixty percent think Washington shouldn't enforce federal laws against marijuana in states that have approved its use.
STICKY ISSUES
Where California led the charge on medical marijuana, the next chapter in this story is being written in Colorado and Washington state.
Policymakers there are grappling with all sorts of sticky issues revolving around one central question: How do you legally regulate the production, distribution, sale and use of marijuana for recreational purposes when federal law bans all of the above?
The Justice Department began reviewing the matter after November's election. But seven months later, states still are on their own.
Both sides in the debate paid close attention when Obama said in December that "it does not make sense, from a prioritization point of view, for us to focus on recreational drug users in a state that has already said that under state law that's legal."
Rep. Jared Polis, a Colorado Democrat who favors legalization, predicts Washington will take a hands-off approach, based on Obama's comments. But he's quick to add, "We would like to see that in writing."
The federal government already has taken a similar approach toward users in states that have approved marijuana for medical use.
It doesn't go after pot-smoking cancer patients or grandmas with glaucoma. But it also has made clear that people who are in the business of growing, selling and distributing marijuana on a large scale are subject to potential prosecution for violations of the Controlled Substances Act even in states that have legalized medical use.
"A REGULATED SYSTEM"
There's a political calculus for the president, or any other politician, in all of this.
Younger people, who tend to vote more Democratic, are more supportive of legalizing marijuana, as are people in the West, where the libertarian streak runs strong.
Despite increasing public acceptance of marijuana overall, politicians know there are complications that could come with commercializing an addictive substance. Opponents of pot are particularly worried that legalization will result in increased use by young people.
Sabet frames the conundrum for Obama: "Do you want to be the president that stops a popular cause, especially a cause that's popular within your own party? Or do you want to be the president that enables youth drug use that will have ramifications down the road?"
Marijuana legalization advocates offer politicians a rosier scenario, in which legitimate pot businesses eager to keep their operating licenses make sure not to sell to minors.
"Having a regulated system is the only way to ensure that we're not ceding control of this popular substance to the criminal market and to black marketeers," says Aaron Smith, executive director of the National Cannabis Industry Association, a trade group for legal pot businesses in the United States.
COURSE CORRECTION
While the federal government hunkers down, Colorado and Washington state are moving forward on their own with regulations covering everything from how plants will be grown to how many stores will be allowed.
Tim Lynch, director of the libertarian Cato Institute's Project on Criminal Justice, predicts "the next few years are going to be messy" as states work to bring a black-market industry into the sunshine.
California's experience with medical marijuana offers a window into potential pitfalls that can come with wider availability of pot.
Dispensaries for medical marijuana have proliferated in the state, and regulation has been lax, prompting a number of cities around the state to ban dispensaries.
In May, the California Supreme Court ruled that cities and counties can ban medical marijuana dispensaries. A few weeks later, Los Angeles voters approved a ballot measure that limits the number of pot shops in the city to 135, down from an estimated high of about 1,000.
This isn't full-scale buyer's remorse, but more a course correction before the inevitable next push for full-on legalization in the state.
"A NEW INDUSTRY"
Growing support for legalization doesn't mean everybody wants to light up: Barely one in 10 Americans used pot in the past year.
Those who do want to see marijuana legalized range from libertarians who oppose much government intervention to people who want to see an activist government aggressively regulate marijuana production and sales.
For some, money talks: Why let drug cartels rake in untaxed profits when a cut could go into government coffers?
There are other threads in the growing acceptance of pot.
People think it's not as dangerous as once believed. They worry about high school youths getting an arrest record. They see racial inequity in the way marijuana laws are enforced. They're weary of the "war on drugs."
Opponents counter with a 2012 study finding that regular use of marijuana during teen years can lead to a long-term drop in IQ, and another study indicating marijuana use can induce and exacerbate psychotic illness in susceptible people. They question the notion that regulating pot will bring in big money, saying revenue estimates are grossly exaggerated.
They reject the claim that prisons are bulging with people convicted of simple possession by citing federal statistics showing only a small percentage of federal and state inmates are behind bars for that alone.
They warn that baby boomers who draw on their own innocuous experiences with pot are overlooking the much higher potency of today's marijuana.
In 2009, concentrations of THC, the psychoactive ingredient in pot, averaged close to 10 percent in marijuana, compared with about 4 percent in the 1980s, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
"If marijuana legalization was about my old buddies at Berkeley smoking in People's Park once a week, I don't think many of us would care that much," says Sabet, who helped to found Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a group that opposes legalization. "It's really about creating a new industry that's going to target kids and target minorities and our vulnerable populations just like our legal industries do today."
So how bad, or good, is pot?
J. Michael Bostwick, a psychiatrist at the Mayo Clinic, set out to sort through more than 100 sometimes conflicting studies after his teenage son became addicted to pot, and turned his findings into a 22-page article for Mayo Clinic Proceedings in 2012.
For all the talk that smoking pot is no big deal, Bostwick says, he determined that "it was a very big deal. There were addiction issues. There were psychosis issues.
"But there was also this very large body of literature suggesting that it could potentially have very valuable pharmaceutical applications, but the research was stymied" by federal barriers.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse says research is ongoing.
Dr. Nora Volkow, the institute's director, worries that legalizing pot will result in increased use of marijuana by young people and impair their brain development.
"Think about it: Do you want a nation where your young people are stoned?" she asks.
Partisans on both sides think people in other states will keep a close eye on Colorado and Washington as they decide what happens next.
But past predictions on pot have been wildly off base.
"Reefer Madness," the 1936 propaganda movie that pot fans turned into a cult classic in the 1970s, spins a tale of dire consequences "ending often in incurable insanity."
Associated Press writers Kristen Wyatt in Denver, Gene Johnson in Seattle, Lauran Neergaard in Washington, D.C., and AP researcher Monika Mathur in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report. .............................
cof
DST
Well-Known Member
Thats an awesome pic method!!!!!!!! so coooooooel!
budolskie
Well-Known Member
Well just planted 5 more pips 2 smelly berry and 3 smelly cherry, have roots on 5 my dogs now thank god! Will get the pics up Lata once I been to the flower room and get a few off the 3 that's at end of week 7 of 12/12, also the other 6 in there will be potting the 3 up in here in 15ltrs then topping for few cuts and train the topd plants for a week till I chop the other 3 down.... Loads pics coming after dinner
jhod58vw
Well-Known Member
Whats up fellow 600 growers?? Here's a picture of my Krypontie Kush & my Purple Cookie Monster both at day 46 of flower. Well off to bed. Been a long day and hella hot 107`. Peace Out & Stay Litt!! Jhod58vwView attachment 2719058
Attachments
DoobieBrother
Well-Known Member
Cool grafting vid:
*fruit trees, not cannabis, but cool none the less
[video=youtube_share;NBOLGzbnkMw]http://youtu.be/NBOLGzbnkMw[/video]
*fruit trees, not cannabis, but cool none the less
[video=youtube_share;NBOLGzbnkMw]http://youtu.be/NBOLGzbnkMw[/video]