zimmerman news

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Hold on...what's this now, my troolie trools? A very boring DNA preso, finally, I see to point.

If Zims story is straight there should be some blood of Zim's on Trevon's clothes, hands, (holding Zims mouth), etc

So, there seems to be no Zim blood from an instantly broken nose, anywhere. So....it ain't over. :)
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Hold on...what's this now, my troolie trools? A very boring DNA preso, finally, I see to point. If Zims story is straight there should be some blood of Zim's on Trevon's clothes, hands, (holding Zims mouth), etc So, there seems to be no Zim blood from an instantly broken nose, anywhere. So....it ain't over. :)
Click to expand...
Why do you assume there was no blood?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Why do you assume there was no blood?
Click to expand...
i believe his assertion is based on a little thing called forensic evidence, or in this case, the complete lack thereof.

but maybe the judge and hury will agree to see things from the perspective of you and desert dud, where evidence is no matter and interrogators get fired for asking questions.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i believe his assertion is based on a little thing called forensic evidence, or in this case, the complete lack thereof.

but maybe the judge and hury will agree to see things from the perspective of you and desert dud, where evidence is no matter and interrogators get fired for asking questions.
Click to expand...
Poor, Bucky, all butt hurt.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Poor, Bucky, all butt hurt.
Click to expand...
why would i be butthurt that you said interrogators should be fired for asking questions?

why would i be butthurt that there is no blood on martin's hands, cuffs, or fingernails, despite supposedly suffocating zimmerman on his bloody face?

these seem more like things that would make you butthurt. so i call projection.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
why would i be butthurt that you said interrogators should be fired for asking questions?

why would i be butthurt that there is no blood on martin's hands, cuffs, or fingernails, despite supposedly suffocating zimmerman on his bloody face?

these seem more like things that would make you butthurt. so i call projection.
Click to expand...
Gee, Buck, it looks like you almost got a degree in psychology too.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
serino should be fired for asking questions!
Click to expand...

Hey, Buck, did you catch the latest prosecutorial back fire? Their witness bolstered the defense case that self defense was reasonable in this case.

"They called as a witness Alexis Francisco Carter, the military attorney who taught the class. Carter described Zimmerman as one of his better students and said the neighborhood watch volunteer got an "A'' in his class.

Under cross-examination, Carter gave two definitions of legal concepts that seemed to bolster the defense's case. He explained that a person can make a self-defense argument if the person has a "reasonable apprehension" of death or great bodily harm.
."Play video



"It's imminent fear. The fact alone that there isn't an injury doesn't necessarily mean that the person didn't have a reasonable apprehension or fear," Carter said. "The fact that there are injuries might support there was reasonable apprehension and fear."


Carter also explained the concept of "imperfect self-defense," when a person is being threatened but then counters with a force disproportionately greater than the force used against them.


"They would have the right to defend themselves?" said defense attorney Don West.


"Right," Carter said.

http://news.yahoo.com/expert-no-martin-dna-gun-grip-200653214.html
 
SirGreenThumb

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Hey, Buck, did you catch the latest prosecutorial back fire? Their witness bolstered the defense case that self defense was reasonable in this case.

"They called as a witness Alexis Francisco Carter, the military attorney who taught the class. Carter described Zimmerman as one of his better students and said the neighborhood watch volunteer got an "A'' in his class.

Under cross-examination, Carter gave two definitions of legal concepts that seemed to bolster the defense's case. He explained that a person can make a self-defense argument if the person has a "reasonable apprehension" of death or great bodily harm.
."Play video



"It's imminent fear. The fact alone that there isn't an injury doesn't necessarily mean that the person didn't have a reasonable apprehension or fear," Carter said. "The fact that there are injuries might support there was reasonable apprehension and fear."


Carter also explained the concept of "imperfect self-defense," when a person is being threatened but then counters with a force disproportionately greater than the force used against them.


"They would have the right to defend themselves?" said defense attorney Don West.


"Right," Carter said.

http://news.yahoo.com/expert-no-martin-dna-gun-grip-200653214.html
Click to expand...
Oh, Oh, Don't forget he is JAG. :grin:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top