Uncle Ben
Well-Known Member
Not a real boner, just a mad on.You got a boner for me Chuck?
Not a real boner, just a mad on.You got a boner for me Chuck?
Nice job! 4# weeks of veg - yowzer!UB has helped me on my first grow....
I used his soil mix, the spin out on the pots and topped for 4 main colas on 13 plants.....yeilded over 3lbs first grow. he has helped me grow
edit: all 13 plants vegged 4 wks from seed too
Please show me where you think I agreed with his theory. I'm pretty sure that the closest I've come to agreeing is to say that I believe defoliation may be beneficial in some situations and in my experience doesn't hurt yield when done in moderation. I believe that there is a possibility that defoliation could potentially increase yield in some situations but there isn't enough testing done to be conclusive either way, so to be so closed minded is foolish. I don't really even know what sir Ganjas method is to know if I would agree or not. Then I still wouldn't be sure until I tried it for myself. I prefer to draw my own conclusions based on real world experience.Not really, but you are the only one agreeing with his defoliation theory, so i figured when he said EVERYONE, he meant you.
Yah sah! You're from the Dam and probably know a bit about Sag's breeding efforts. Remember Tony bred some Colombian with the Matanuska Thunderfuck around 2000 to make Peak19? Well, I did a F2 backcross. Check out this recessive Colombian leaf structure that showed up on one plant!Leaf porn!
If it's so lousy, why are you here?I thought someone deleted this lousy thread?
o.k, sorry, i wasn't trying to start anything , just merely point out sir ganja's imagined followersPlease show me where you think I agreed with his theory. I'm pretty sure that the closest I've come to agreeing is to say that I believe defoliation may be beneficial in some situations and in my experience doesn't hurt yield when done in moderation. I believe that there is a possibility that defoliation could potentially increase yield in some situations but there isn't enough testing done to be conclusive either way, so to be so closed minded is foolish. I don't really even know what sir Ganjas method is to know if I would agree or not. Then I still wouldn't be sure until I tried it for myself. I prefer to draw my own conclusions based on real world experience.
Damnit, i had a plant that looked like that last year and had to kill it because of an unexpected roomate....Yah sah! You're from the Dam and probably know a bit about Sag's breeding efforts. Remember Tony bred some Colombian with the Matanuska Thunderfuck around 2000 to make Peak19? Well, I did a F2 backcross. Check out this recessive Colombian leaf structure that showed up on one plant!
Not that's a skinny little lady!
There you go, you have finally admitted that there is a necessary ratio for fruit and flower production to leaf surface ratio. That means depending on how the plant is growing that there is a set number of leaves that are necessary to support bud growth. So, if you have done some form of pruining or training and removed some of these bud sites, less leaves are required to support the same flowering growth for the plant aka defoliation.As vineyard owner
It takes 13 - 15 leaves to ripen a cluster of grapes, and that's a fact.
UB
Pardon my noviceness but it sounds like, and looks like, what you are talking about is minimizing the lower foliage to promote larger growth of the remaining bud sites. Isnt this something tomato farmers have been doing for like, ever? It doesnt have anything to do with these guys saying to strike off any leaf that is covering a bud site. I am fairly certain i have read that the buds and sugar leafs are super inefficient at photosynthesis. I actually read one guy that says he doesnt leave any leaf on the plant more then 2 weeks. Kidding right?There you go, you have finally admitted that there is a necessary ratio for fruit and flower production to leaf surface ratio. That means depending on how the plant is growing that there is a set number of leaves that are necessary to support bud growth. So, if you have done some form of pruining or training and removed some of these bud sites, less leaves are required to support the same flowering growth for the plant aka defoliation.
Exactly sir. There are so many people out there giving defoliation a bad name because they don't understand that is s selective removal that has to do with a lot more than just photosynthesis. Most people think that defoliation means chop off all your fan leaves every 2 weeks. LOL first off, how can there be a set time for how long the leaves are to grow, it has to be done by observation and secondly havn't they noticed that when they remove all those fan leaves that the growth is slowed tremendously until the leaves come back? I don't get it, you need leaves, but you dont need them all, just enough.Pardon my noviceness but it sounds like, and looks like, what you are talking about is minimizing the lower foliage to promote larger growth of the remaining bud sites. Isnt this something tomato farmers have been doing for like, ever? It doesnt have anything to do with these guys saying to strike off any leaf that is covering a bud site. I am fairly certain i have read that the buds and sugar leafs are super inefficient at photosynthesis. I actually read one guy that says he doesnt leave any leaf on the plant more then 2 weeks. Kidding right?
DB
Then I don't get why you two don't get along. I don't think I've ever heard Ben argue against that method. I think he even mentioned it in one of his posts on this topic. It's like you are arguing that he is saying topping is defoliation and that is stupid.Exactly sir. There are so many people out there giving defoliation a bad name because they don't understand that it is selective removal that has to do with a lot more than just photosynthesis. Most people think that defoliation means chop off all your fan leaves every 2 weeks. LOL first off, how can there be a set time for how long the leaves are to grow, it has to be done by observation and secondly havn't they noticed that when they remove all those fan leaves that the growth is slowed tremendously until the leaves come back? I don't get it, you need leaves, but you dont need them all, just enough.
Why did my post double? thats weirdThen I don't get why you two don't get along. I don't think I've ever heard Ben argue against that method. I think he even mentioned it in one of his posts on this topic. It's like you are arguing that he is saying topping is defoliation and that is stupid.
Ben correct me if I am wrong, but don't you also prune out the lower growth to promote top production?
That might be the best plant I've ever seen. Maybe I should read some more on UB methods. They seem to work..View attachment 2788709 Another Tribute To Uncle Ben !! It was his advice that helped get me started. Glad the thread came back !
That's a nice pic. I like it. I just recently discovered that angle as a good shot for a photo. It's kinda hard with my setup, but I've been pulling it off lately.