Rand Paul forces Holder/Obama to lighten up on the drug war...

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Cheesy trumpeted Holder's sudden backing away on mandatory minimums. Here is the reason it happened.

http://harpers.org/blog/2013/08/on-rand-pauls-war-on-the-war-on-drugs/

Twice now this year, Rand Paul has flanked the Obama Administration from the left. The first time, when Paul staged a dramatic thirteen-hour talking filibuster to protest the government’s secretive drone-assassination program, the episode could have been written off as an opportunistic stunt. But with his latest move as the tacit leader of the disorganized libertarian-populist movement, Paul staked out less impeachable ground: America’s cruel, racially biased, and generally nonsensical drug-sentencing laws.

I discussed Holder’s move with Neill Franklin, a thirty-four-year veteran of the Maryland State Police and the Baltimore Police Department who serves as the executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), an organization of current and former officers and officials working to end the war on drugs. “Too little, too late,” he told me. Franklin appreciates that the government’s highest-ranking criminal-justice official admitted to a failure of the system, but he is wary of being fooled twice. In October 2009, Holder’s Ogden Memo vowed to respect states’ rights where medical-marijuana laws were concerned. But by the end of Obama’s first term, the Drug Enforcement Agency had raided and closed more than four times as many state-approved marijuana shops than were shut down during George W. Bush’s eight years in office. From Montana to California, the DOJ, DEA, and IRS worked in concert to do precisely what the administration had vowed not to do.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
OMGZ REND PAW; IS SOOOOOO DREAMY I WANT TO SUCK REND PAW;'S WEINER OF FREEDOM YAY RAWN PAWL AND REND PAW; THEY ARE THE ONLY GOOD THING IN THIS NATION AND I LOVE THEIR NEWSLETTERS AND WHITE SUPREMACIST STAFFERS BUT I AM TOTALLY NOT RACIST I JUST LOVE REND PAW;

aaa
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
In October 2009, Holder’s Ogden Memo vowed to respect states’ rights where medical-marijuana laws were concerned. But by the end of Obama’s first term, the Drug Enforcement Agency had raided and closed more than four times as many state-approved marijuana shops than were shut down during George W. Bush’s eight years in office. From Montana to California, the DOJ, DEA, and IRS worked in concert to do precisely what the administration had vowed not to do.
1 how many Medical marijuana Dispensarys were open under George Bush's term
2 Which dispensarys that were busted were following state laws?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The following is a summary of your argument:
Rand Paul held a filibuster about drones, and he had a discussion with Neill Franklin. In the discussion with this Maryland ex-cop, it was mentioned that Holder admitted the drug war is a failure. Therefore Rand Paul forced Holder to lighten up on the drug war.

This fallacy is called illicit affirmative.

At least the criticism of Obama made it entertaining.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
The following is a summary of your argument:
Rand Paul held a filibuster about drones, and he had a discussion with Neill Franklin. In the discussion with this Maryland ex-cop, it was mentioned that Holder admitted the drug war is a failure. Therefore Rand Paul forced Holder to lighten up on the drug war.

This fallacy is called illicit affirmative.

At least the criticism of Obama made it entertaining.
Your momma is illicit affirmative.

Burn bongsmilie
 

El Tiberon

Active Member
Cheesy trumpeted Holder's sudden backing away on mandatory minimums. Here is the reason it happened.

http://harpers.org/blog/2013/08/on-rand-pauls-war-on-the-war-on-drugs/

Twice now this year, Rand Paul has flanked the Obama Administration from the left. The first time, when Paul staged a dramatic thirteen-hour talking filibuster to protest the government’s secretive drone-assassination program, the episode could have been written off as an opportunistic stunt. But with his latest move as the tacit leader of the disorganized libertarian-populist movement, Paul staked out less impeachable ground: America’s cruel, racially biased, and generally nonsensical drug-sentencing laws.

I discussed Holder’s move with Neill Franklin, a thirty-four-year veteran of the Maryland State Police and the Baltimore Police Department who serves as the executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), an organization of current and former officers and officials working to end the war on drugs. “Too little, too late,” he told me. Franklin appreciates that the government’s highest-ranking criminal-justice official admitted to a failure of the system, but he is wary of being fooled twice. In October 2009, Holder’s Ogden Memo vowed to respect states’ rights where medical-marijuana laws were concerned. But by the end of Obama’s first term, the Drug Enforcement Agency had raided and closed more than four times as many state-approved marijuana shops than were shut down during George W. Bush’s eight years in office. From Montana to California, the DOJ, DEA, and IRS worked in concert to do precisely what the administration had vowed not to do.
You can put lipstick on a republican...it is still a racist pig.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Which dispensarys that were busted were following state laws?
the "trump card" they gave me was a felon in michigan (felons are not allowed to even grow) who was growing 156 plants outdoors (totally personal use, brah) and who had cleared $300k in sales to non-medical patients in the previous months (chump change).

thank goodness for rend paw;.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
The following is a summary of your argument:
Rand Paul held a filibuster about drones, and he had a discussion with Neill Franklin. In the discussion with this Maryland ex-cop, it was mentioned that Holder admitted the drug war is a failure. Therefore Rand Paul forced Holder to lighten up on the drug war.

This fallacy is called illicit affirmative.

At least the criticism of Obama made it entertaining.
Ok AC is making sense . .whats next i learn to spell . . .who are you and what did you do with AC
 
Top