2 million bigots tea baggies to DC

C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
The retardation spilling out of RIU lately is impressive. Peaceful Muslims were just exercising their 1st in a blatant attempt to spike the football, so leave them alone. The bikers (who were also exercising their 1st but people are upset about their right to do it) are nothing but a bunch of teabaggers trying to do... what is it now?

Imagine a bunch of rednecks having a peaceful celebration in MISS at the hotel where MLK was shot on the anniversary date. It would be just as tasteless and just as right to let them know and maybe exercise our 1st to try to drown them out.

I swear sometimes Bucktard and cheesetits post on roll it up as part of their make a wish.
Click to expand...

Now you are really talking out your ass
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Now you are really talking out your ass
Click to expand...
Dude, you are the guy defending one groups 1st while bashing the others. It's ironic, it's tarded and it's a (in typical Cheesetits style) mean-spirited bigoted reaction.

I feel bad sometimes engaging you because you are obviously not well equipped in the thinking department needed for debates, and it's only asking for aggravation, but ffs, sometimes you need a reality check.

Maybe you could copy/paste someone's thoughts or call another woman a cunt, that seems to work for you.
edit: (there ya go man, I was late with that last sentence, you were way ahead of me)
 
jason1976

jason1976

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
While the Irish were abused and taken advantage of, it didn't constitute slavery.
Click to expand...
im sorry? did i miss something? the irish were forced to work and if they ran they set their feet on fire. i blieve in modern society wed call that slavery. they were worth less than the black slaves. read a book man. just because we were embarrased that we enslaved white people,and didnt teach it in history to the fullest doesnt mean it didnt happen. some say there was no holocost but we know diffrent right? vietnam wasnt a war, we know diffrent right?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
anarchists need no permission. Some need government stimulus though, that one stumps me.
Click to expand...
Nice try.

You're going to be dissapointed, but I can see you are looking to pick a debate with me.

Very well, let me disclose what i think of stimulus. It is not as you say, "anarchist needs stimulus". That is a fine troll attempt though, and I give you props.

The only thing that makes capitalism work, is stimulus. With out stimulus, capitalism would have failed a century ago. FDR saved capitalism, and Obama saved it again.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
jason1976 said:
im sorry? did i miss something? the irish were forced to work and if they ran they set their feet on fire. i blieve in modern society wed call that slavery. they were worth less than the black slaves. read a book man. just because we were embarrased that we enslaved white people,and didnt teach it in history to the fullest doesnt mean it didnt happen. some say there was no holocost but we know diffrent right? vietnam wasnt a war, we know diffrent right?
Click to expand...
No one could legally own an Irishman, the definition of slavery. Never heard of any ones feet been set on fire. Crippling a slave would be foolish. Sorry, but your tales of "foot burning" are unique and without evidence. The Holocaust and Vietnam have nothing to do with this conversation at all and don't give credence to your statements.
 
thecoolman

thecoolman

New Member
Red1966 said:
No one could legally own an Irishman, the definition of slavery. Never heard of any ones feet been set on fire. Crippling a slave would be foolish. Sorry, but your tales of "foot burning" are unique and without evidence. The Holocaust and Vietnam have nothing to do with this conversation at all and don't give credence to your statements.
Click to expand...

Actually your wrong. There were hundreds of thousands of Irish slaves in the 1600s. There were
however more in the west indies and Caribbean than America and yes they were owned.
I believe it was George the 2nd that ordered the selling of the Irish as slaves.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
No one could legally own an Irishman, the definition of slavery. Never heard of any ones feet been set on fire. Crippling a slave would be foolish. Sorry, but your tales of "foot burning" are unique and without evidence. The Holocaust and Vietnam have nothing to do with this conversation at all and don't give credence to your statements.
Click to expand...
Not up on reality. The only difference in Australia was you were indentured, technically. But, a white slave you were, in fact.

And there were Irish slaves in Britain. Sunni Jihad owned white Americans as galley slaves.

And maiming and nutting was quite common and there is a lot of evidence. Jee, why would just state such a racist opinion? Just skin head, really?

James Ramsay, a doctor working for several sugar plantations in St Kitts, was shocked by the way the slaves were treated by the overseers. Ramsay later recalled in his book, Essay on the Treatment and Conversion of African Slaves in the British Sugar Colonies (1784): "The ordinary punishments of slaves, for the common crimes of neglect, absence from work, eating the sugar cane, theft, are cart whipping, beating with a stick, sometimes to the breaking of bones, the chain, an iron crook about the neck... a ring about the ankle, and confinement in the dungeon. There have been instances of slitting of ears, breaking of limbs, so as to make amputation necessary, beating out of eyes, and castration.

-----------------

The British brought the slave system, and being a Son of the South, I was raised to abhor it. You were raised to make light of the horror I guess.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top