UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yeah, there's no evidence of her putting out.As if she would put out...
yeah, there's no evidence of her putting out.As if she would put out...
Forum stutter^^^^^^^^^^^President Obama cant wait to get Americans addicted to the crack cocaine of dependency on more government health care, she said in an interview with the far-right WorldNetDaily site where she regularly gives explosive interviews. Once they enroll millions of more individual Americans, it will be virtually impossible for us to pull these benefits back from people, Bachmann continued. All they want to do is buy love from people by giving them massive government subsidies.
Yeah, 12 years ago...yeah, there's no evidence of her putting out.
Isn't putting out against the platform of the right wing?As if she would put out...
El goat! The expert on American politics speaks!!The thing I can't understand is this is a weed site and yet there are so many far right thinkers here. It is almost as though they are planted here. The far right does not support cannabis in any form or fashion. I think I remember the right wing candidate saying he would end cannabis if elected during the last election. Does this mean that the right wing here support cannabis or not. It would seem by the rhetoric that they would be on the sides of those who they support, yet their side does not support cannabis in any way in the US. I have read that republicans are the party of angry white men. This seems to explain it all. They want their mota and alcohol and pills and yet want to project an attitude of righteous self-indignation to all others. I wonder how many of the crazy people who post here and support these right wing ideals also served their country in the military? I wonder how many are married and have children? I have spoken to many US military in Bogota and they want cannabis and hate the republican opinion of stopping it. Where do the people on this site come from? It is almost like they have escaped from an asylum. Few seem to be educated beyond high school and a US high school education is middle school in most countries. Few if any have critical thinking skills or the capacity for abstract thought. If you want to give an example of how to destroy a country, you are doing a great job.
No...? You'll have to explain that one to me.Isn't putting out against the platform of the right wing?
yes. yes it is.Isn't putting out against the platform of the right wing?
Can't you and Chesus give up this fantasy that one person in a miniscule position speaks for the entire Republican party?yes. yes it is.
Birth Control Debate: New Hampshire Lawmaker Urges Married Couples To Practice Abstinence
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/17/birth-control-debate-new-hampshire-lawmaker-abstinence_n_1284934.html
Bill's busy elsewhere.Somebody need to do Hilary.
The right wing is a christian and fear, doom, gloom based organization. Without the church, they fail. The church preaches abstinence. You chose it and chose it over the plant. This is what you stand for.Can't you and Chesus give up this fantasy that one person in a miniscule position speaks for the entire Republican party?
i must just be imagining abstinence only sex "education" in a swath of red states.Can't you and Chesus give up this fantasy that one person in a miniscule position speaks for the entire Republican party?
Thank you for making your ignorance abundantly clear to all.The right wing is a christian and fear, doom, gloom based organization. Without the church, they fail. The church preaches abstinence. You chose it and chose it over the plant. This is what you stand for.
Your article is about a state lawmaker saying married couples should practice abstinence, which is totally unrelated.i must just be imagining abstinence only sex "education" in a swath of red states.
and it works so well.
Damn boy!The right wing is a christian and fear, doom, gloom based organization. Without the church, they fail. The church preaches abstinence. You chose it and chose it over the plant. This is what you stand for.
no, she's just the poster gal for the right's love of abstinence.Your article is about a state lawmaker saying married couples should practice abstinence, which is totally unrelated.
Are you doctoring more charts in photoshop Buck?
Your own Rowe verses Wade case is ultimately based on the rights of married couples to have sex with contraception in the own house. I believe it began in New Hampshire or some place in that area. Your own court ruled that what happens with men and women behind their doors is personal privacy.no, she's just the poster gal for the right's love of abstinence.
plenty of them do our children a disservice with abstinence only sex "education" (more accurately, a lack of education about sex), only some of them go so far as saying even married couples should practice abstinence.
not putting out is the de facto platform of the GOP.
"Some of them" being the one person you put up on a poster. "Not putting out" is not the platform of the Republican party.no, she's just the poster gal for the right's love of abstinence.
plenty of them do our children a disservice with abstinence only sex "education" (more accurately, a lack of education about sex), only some of them go so far as saying even married couples should practice abstinence.
not putting out is the de facto platform of the GOP.
no, it's not limited to one person."Some of them" being the one person you put up on a poster.
i agree."Not putting out" is not the platform of the Republican party.