Obamacare saved my son's life

[tokeprep]

no, it's not limited to one person.

during the debates, rawn pawl called sex for reasons other than procreation 'immoral'. no one took issue with what he said, the audience applauded it, and the right wingers here defended the statement.

there are a lot of people who stupidly support the notion of abstinence even within a marriage, you are just too stubborn to recognize it right now.

Ron Paul, the person the Republicans barely voted for during any primary ever. Thanks for making my point.

i agree.

but what i said was that it is the de facto platform of the republican party.

there's an important distinction there. since they are too much of a bunch of pussies to just admit it and put it in their actual platform.

i mean, abstinence before marriage is in their official platform. but abstinence, even after marriage (unless for procreation) is in their de facto platform.

No, that's just bullshit and you know it is. You just enjoy pretending.

 

[Nutes and Nugs]

no, it's not limited to one person.

during the debates, rawn pawl called sex for reasons other than procreation 'immoral'. no one took issue with what he said, the audience applauded it, and the right wingers here defended the statement.

there are a lot of people who stupidly support the notion of abstinence even within a marriage, you are just too stubborn to recognize it right now.



i agree.

but what i said was that it is the de facto platform of the republican party.

there's an important distinction there. since they are too much of a bunch of pussies to just admit it and put it in their actual platform.

i mean, abstinence before marriage is in their official platform. but abstinence, even after marriage (unless for procreation) is in their de facto platform.

That shits just crazy.

What is the democratic platform on sex?
Just go around and recklessly fuck anyone and anything?

 

[tokeprep]

That shits just crazy.

What is the democratic platform on sex?
Just go around and recklessly fuck anyone and anything?

Buck/Chesus generally don't believe in substantive discussion. See this forum. Instead, they like to find the craziest people on the right and then portray them as being the ideal of the right.

Edit: My main point is that there is no leftist intellectual in this forum. There are some on the right, and I'm in the middle, but where is the leftist intellectual at?

 

[Nutes and Nugs]

Buck/Chesus generally don't believe in substantive discussion. See this forum. Instead, they like to find the craziest people on the right and then portray them as being the ideal of the right.

Edit: My main point is that there is no leftist intellectual in this forum. There are some on the right, and I'm in the middle, but where is the leftist intellectual at?

Good point.
I know all the left wing extremists.

 

[UncleBuck]

Ron Paul, the person the Republicans barely voted for during any primary ever. Thanks for making my point.

he was just my first example.

remember rick santorum's main backer making the statement about aspirin between the knees?

there's no shortage of this kinda stuff.

No, that's just bullshit and you know it is. You just enjoy pretending.

i must be pretend hearing GOP representatives advocate for abstinence within marriage, or call sex for reasons other than procreation immoral, or talk about an aspirin between the knees.

i must have had pretend discussions with many, many righties here on this forum defending said statements.

i must have just pretended to hear the audience applaud when such statements were made in debates, or during stump speeches.

yep, it's all just pretend.

you so silly, touchperp.

 

[UncleBuck]

Buck/Chesus generally don't believe in substantive discussion. See this forum.

i have made more substantive, fact-based statements in this current discussion we are having than you.

you just write it all off as "pretending", instead of making any substantive rebuttal.

by the way, rawn pawl got over 2 million votes in the primaries after calling sex for reasons other than procreation "immoral".

they must have all been pretending too.

come back at me when you have some actual substance rather than flippant dismissals.

 

[tokeprep]

he was just my first example.

remember rick santorum's main backer making the statement about aspirin between the knees?

there's no shortage of this kinda stuff.

Ron Paul and Rick Santorum constitute a shortage. I'm sorry if you were too blinded to realize that.

i must be pretend hearing GOP representatives advocate for abstinence within marriage, or call sex for reasons other than procreation immoral, or talk about an aspirin between the knees.

All a tiny, tiny minority that you represent as the majority. Why don't you stop being dishonest and laugh at them like the rest of us do?

i must have had pretend discussions with many, many righties here on this forum defending said statements.

I haven't seen any lately. Feel free to direct me to some...

i must have just pretended to hear the audience applaud when such statements were made in debates, or during stump speeches.

yep, it's all just pretend.

you so silly, touchperp.

An audience does not represent a party.

 

[tokeprep]

Don't forget their queen Palin spoke of such things and hide her daughter, or is it now daughters? taking dick out of marriage.

It is all about them. Only whites win.

Fuck them. Breed them out.

I will beat my white employees that I know need a job.

If you think Palin is the queen you're only making the case about your ignorance.

 

[UncleBuck]

Don't forget their queen Palin spoke of such things and hide her daughter, or is it now daughters?

well, she only hid her preggers daughter.

she carries around her retarded kid (or is it grandkid?) everywhere she goes in order to look slightly less retarded in comparison.

it's not working so well for her.

 

[Nutes and Nugs]

Don't forget their queen Palin spoke of such things and hide her daughter, or is it now daughters? taking dick out of marriage.

It is all about them. Only whites win.

Fuck them. Breed them out.

I will beat my white employees that I know need a job.

Now that is just racist.

 

[UncleBuck]

If you think Palin is the queen you're only making the case about your ignorance.

palin has 3.8 million followers on facebook.

let's take a look at some others.

chris christie? 119,000 (LOL!)

rick santorum? 226,000 (LOL!)

marco rubio? 573,000 (LOL!)

ted cruz? 392,000 (LOL!)

rand paul? 1.3 million (LOL!)

bobby jindal? 172,000 (LOL!)

mike huckabee? 1.2 million (LOL!)

jeb bush? 21,000 (LOL!)

turns out she is the queen, and by quite some distance. she has the most popularity of any right winger on facebook who is planning on any kind of a run.

she even beats out rush limbaugh by a couple million.

suck on that.

 

[Nutes and Nugs]

palin has 3.8 million followers on facebook.

let's take a look at some others.

chris christie? 119,000 (LOL!)

rick santorum? 226,000 (LOL!)

marco rubio? 573,000 (LOL!)

ted cruz? 392,000 (LOL!)

rand paul? 1.3 million (LOL!)

bobby jindal? 172,000 (LOL!)

mike huckabee? 1.2 million (LOL!)

jeb bush? 21,000 (LOL!)

turns out she is the queen, and by quite some distance. she has the most popularity of any right winger on facebook who is planning on any kind of a run.

she even beats out rush limbaugh by a couple million.

suck on that.

Post your facebook page Bucky.
How many friends do you have?
(LOL!)Most of those people you posted have more friends than your shitty posts.

 

[El Tiberon]

palin has 3.8 million followers on facebook.

let's take a look at some others.

chris christie? 119,000 (LOL!)

rick santorum? 226,000 (LOL!)

marco rubio? 573,000 (LOL!)

ted cruz? 392,000 (LOL!)

rand paul? 1.3 million (LOL!)

bobby jindal? 172,000 (LOL!)

mike huckabee? 1.2 million (LOL!)

jeb bush? 21,000 (LOL!)

turns out she is the queen, and by quite some distance. she has the most popularity of any right winger on facebook who is planning on any kind of a run.

she even beats out rush limbaugh by a couple million.

suck on that.

grapefruits. swing for the fence.

 

[tokeprep]

palin has 3.8 million followers on facebook.

let's take a look at some others.

chris christie? 119,000 (LOL!)

rick santorum? 226,000 (LOL!)

marco rubio? 573,000 (LOL!)

ted cruz? 392,000 (LOL!)

rand paul? 1.3 million (LOL!)

bobby jindal? 172,000 (LOL!)

mike huckabee? 1.2 million (LOL!)

jeb bush? 21,000 (LOL!)

turns out she is the queen, and by quite some distance. she has the most popularity of any right winger on facebook who is planning on any kind of a run.

she even beats out rush limbaugh by a couple million.

suck on that.

Facebook doesn't measure reality. If you needed me to tell you that, I don't know what to tell you.

 

[El Tiberon]

Facebook doesn't measure reality. If you needed me to tell you that, I don't know what to tell you.

are these computer generated numbers? They seem pretty real as those who pressed the button.

 

[UncleBuck]

Facebook doesn't measure reality. If you needed me to tell you that, I don't know what to tell you.

facebook measures who will seek out a politician and follow them so that what they have to say shows up on their news feed.

more users prefer hearing from palin than any other right winger, and by a long margin.

suck on that, touchperp.

 

[tokeprep]

are these computer generated numbers? They seem pretty real as those who pressed the button.

Which is meaningless. Are they real people? Do they vote? Facebook cannot tell you that.

 

[tokeprep]

facebook measures who will seek out a politician and follow them so that what they have to say shows up on their news feed.

more users prefer hearing from palin than any other right winger, and by a long margin.

suck on that, touchperp.

And the people like you who subscribe for a laugh? How do we account for that? Oh, right...we cannot.

 

[El Tiberon]

Which is meaningless. Are they real people? Do they vote? Facebook cannot tell you that.

You do have a point. Right wing news said Romney would win. Good point.

 

[UncleBuck]

And the people like you who subscribe for a laugh? How do we account for that? Oh, right...we cannot.

the number of people who do that would be pretty even across the board.

even if they were incredibly, majorly lopsided towards palin, she would still be the queen by a mile.

what a weak, stupid rebuttal.

they should have taught you better at devryU.