UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
my apologies for admitting when i make a mistake.It's too bad someone like UncleBuck isn't here to call you a deceptive LIAR for the next few months, eh?
my apologies for admitting when i make a mistake.It's too bad someone like UncleBuck isn't here to call you a deceptive LIAR for the next few months, eh?
here is the group that put together the 9/11 ride against the Muslims
https://www.facebook.com/#!/2MillionBikersDC
The country made for white males only?My Grandfather and Uncle used this symbolize before fanatic republicans took hold of it.
If you don't see the resemblance then you are just a simple minded partisan thug that knows nothing about the the foundation of america ...
islam is not a monolith.Pro-tip, the Sunnis are the ones who don't casually drink alcohol.
Shias tend to care FAR less.
You know fuck all bro, cite one reliable source.like i was told..provide proof. im not out of my element. i know my geneology. inspired me to study the events and thus the outcome . call it what you will say it didnt happen, whatever you want to say. i beleive the proofs is there. and lol at the son thing...
The country made for white males only?
Your citation is devoid of any evidence. Perhaps you are unable to tell the difference between historical documentation and nut job propaganda? Those Irish not only volunteered to come here, they PAID for the privilege. Some quite dearly, becoming indentured servants to pay the fare. And "indentured servant" doesn't constitute slavery, since I'm sure you now will try to claim it is.http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076 read away all knowing one. then apologize for being a condesending dick.
Your citation is devoid of any evidence. Perhaps you are unable to tell the difference between historical documentation and nut job propaganda? Those Irish not only volunteered to come here, they PAID for the privilege. Some quite dearly, becoming indentured servants to pay the fare. And "indentured servant" doesn't constitute slavery, since I'm sure you now will try to claim it is.
Just don't let that happen again.my apologies for admitting when i make a mistake.
learnt? actual irish person? your education shows loudly my irish friend. while you learnt your history did they forget proper spelling? and my reliable source was cited. read up, and dont be embarrased because it happened. embrace it as history and learn it.You know fuck all bro, cite one reliable source.
Btw, I'm an actual Irish person, not some "plastic paddy" like you, therefore I probably learnt Irish history somewhat more comprehensively than you.
deny the truth. everyone else does. im glad all you non believers can grow bud, cause you sure wouldnt make a living teaching history. and your 10 year senior of myself is no doubt respected, open your mind and learn something new.Your citation is devoid of any evidence. Perhaps you are unable to tell the difference between historical documentation and nut job propaganda? Those Irish not only volunteered to come here, they PAID for the privilege. Some quite dearly, becoming indentured servants to pay the fare. And "indentured servant" doesn't constitute slavery, since I'm sure you now will try to claim it is.
Out of it big time if you will stamp feet an insist there were no Irish slaves. You have no idea. Indentured is the same thing if there is no way beyond the Company Store. But, they were not even indentured for the most part. So, do research before being weird.like i was told..provide proof. im not out of my element. i know my geneology. inspired me to study the events and thus the outcome . call it what you will say it didnt happen, whatever you want to say. i beleive the proofs is there. and lol at the son thing...
You wouldn't know a Sunni Muslim if he was flying a plane on which you were a passenger.
So can you cite something other than a opinionated essay?deny the truth. everyone else does. im glad all you non believers can grow bud, cause you sure wouldnt make a living teaching history. and your 10 year senior of myself is no doubt respected, open your mind and learn something new.
Are you really trying say this English Kings did not EVER take up and sell Irish slaves? And that is outside of the question of Escaping.So can you cite something other than a opinionated essay?
Nope?
Google "Coffin Ships", educate yourself and you'll realise the people on the ships PAID to escape the conditions that were here at the time.
Fucking fake potato-head thinks he knows something...
This is bullshit. There is no Proclamation.Out of it big time if you will stamp feet an insist there were no Irish slaves. You have no idea. Indentured is the same thing if there is no way beyond the Company Store. But, they were not even indentured for the most part. So, do research before being weird.
----------------
The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Irelands population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britains solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. Theyll come up with terms like Indentured Servants to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/31076