Generally yes, but I am serious on this subject.
I will admit I do have a natural tendency to ridicule most forms of conspiracy theories but I like to humor them occasionally and try to see things from their viewpoint and logic. But with all this "9/11 WAS IN INSIDE JOB LOLOBLJOMGOMGOMG!!11" I just don't see the reasoning behind it. The WTC produced alot of money, why choose that one if you are going to manipulate a false strike? I could understand better if we invaded a country that we could gain from, like Russia or somewhere in Europe. But Afganistan?? Not to mention Bin Laden openly claimed 9/11 was his doing..
The only thing I could see that Bush would gain from 9/11 would be to expand on his presidental powers, like the Patriot Act. If this is the case, then the House and Senate and the democrats in them, are the blame as well, for they all passed it. So, I am willing to accept that it is all a master plan from the U.S. government (Dems and Repubs) to gain more power over the people, but to single it out on Bush is just another roadsign on the "I H8 BUSH" bandwagon.