Come to think about it ,more carefully ...
Well ...
( Reconsidering is a sub-procedure of evolving,I wonder ....? )
Since NW ~4500K and WW 3000K leds ,both of 75-80 CRI ,are more efficient than the ones of higher CRI ...
Why not to have the " all-time-classic " ratio 2:1 ( Warm: Cool -neutral at this case) of those two types of leds ,
as the " bulk " light power ?
Two types of Phosphor Conversion Whites ,to cover the photosynthetic needs ,
offering a wide range of wavelengths ,with relatively high efficiency ....
The main ' engine ' ....
And then ,in another 'line' few blue leds of mixed wls (440-470 nm ) ...
For photomorphogenic purposes ,mainly ....
( compact plant,dense wide foliage ,lots of branches/ budsites ,lateral rooting,stomatal opening,etc )
Not much power ,needed...
And for sure widest lens angle possible ...
Sounds useful ,for early vegging ....
And last but not least ,the "muscle " line ....
-When all the protein synthesis is over ( Vegetative stage ) and the plant(s) ,
start to cease "shooting " new growth ,while slowly entering the reproductive
phase ....When Carbonhydrate biosynthesis ,now takes the throne ....
Enough Hyper reds ,
along with some WW 2700 K of high CRI ( 90-95 ) .........
That 'duo' will "bulk " seedpods ( flowers ) ,beyond Nature's wildest dreams ....
...
I think it is worth a try ,afterall .....
) ..
