ginwilly
Well-Known Member
You mean like yelling racist whenever there is dissension? I'm not a fan of those republicans either.Same tired tactics, Republicans make enough noise to distract everyone from the subject at hand. Sad.
You mean like yelling racist whenever there is dissension? I'm not a fan of those republicans either.Same tired tactics, Republicans make enough noise to distract everyone from the subject at hand. Sad.
So did Reagan by winning 49 of 50 states.obama won the whitest states as well as the blackest ones.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_African-American_population
montana: obama 56-41
vermont: obama 59-39
idaho: null
maine: obama, 15-9
north dakota: obama, 8-5
south dakota: hillary 55-45
new hampshire: obama, 13-9
utah: obama, 57-39
wyoming: obama, 61-38
oregon: obama, 59-41
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
why did 9 of the 10 whitest states go for obama if democrats vote based on race?
everybody hates it so much that you guys are literally shaking in your boots about how popular it will become.We have bipartisan support against Obamacare in the senate.
People are shaking in the boots at the risk of losing their health care just the way they like it. Leave my health care alone! Stay the hell away from it. I don't need to hear about your government mastermind scheme, where we launder money through the private sector, cycle it through the government, and inflate it in the form of rising health care costs for A LOT of people.everybody hates it so much that you guys are literally shaking in your boots about how popular it will become.
makes sense.
health care costs have been steady for the last 3 years while we've been starting to implement the PPACA.People are shaking in the boots at the risk of losing their health care just the way they like it. Leave my health care alone! Stay the hell away from it. I don't need to hear about your government mastermind scheme, where we launder money through the private sector, cycle it through the government, and inflate it in the form of rising health care costs for A LOT of people.
You want to distract people about the past three years. The problem we are talking about, is what's been going on the past 3 weeks, since Obamacare has been implemented....health care costs have been steady for the last 3 years while we've been starting to implement the PPACA.
you may want to include some truth in your rhetoric once in a while, just as a change up to keep us on our toes.
OK. I'll play your little game.ooooh, an article from the same website that deceptively edited a video to make shirley sherrod appear racist and get her fired.
if you wish to link to a credible news agency, rather than one whose mission is to be as biased and provocative as possible at the expense of the truth, i might just humor you.
are you salivating yet?ooooh, an article from the same website that deceptively edited a video to make shirley sherrod appear racist and get her fired.
if you wish to link to a credible news agency, rather than one whose mission is to be as biased and provocative as possible at the expense of the truth, i might just humor you.
so popular the website got overwhelmed by the volumeeverybody hates it so much that you guys are literally shaking in your boots about how popular it will become.
makes sense.
[video=youtube;Rtw1ERYapjQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rtw1ERYapjQ[/video]so popular the website got overwhelmed by the volume
Usually when people quote someone, their reply is to the person they quoted. If it seems like code and is hard to understand, you can assume it wasn't meant for you to understand since you weren't quoted. In other words, its probably something only the person who is being quoted would understand.LMAO! What the fuck did you just say? You can't even get your tenses right bro. What is the subject? Who is we? And when you say, "you" do you mean UB himself?
Debt adjusted by inflation? What? You might want to go look up what inflation is sport.
Yeah its crazy, at the rate people are signing up we will have them all covered by the year 2507!everybody hates it so much that you guys are literally shaking in your boots about how popular it will become.
makes sense.
Really, you don't understand the term inflation adjusted debt and your the one laughing, sport.LMAO! Debt adjusted by inflation? What? You might want to go look up what inflation is sport.
you think that setting a baseline based on inflation can make positive numbers negative and vice versa.Really, you don't understand the term inflation adjusted debt and your the one laughing, sport.
Usually when people quote someone, their reply is to the person they quoted. If it seems like code and is hard to understand, you can assume it wasn't meant for you to understand since you weren't quoted. In other words, its probably something only the person who is being quoted would understand.
Get it now?
Hope this helps you not look like such a pompous ass next time, but I doubt it.
[video=youtube;AEOpX8tmiUI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEOpX8tmiUI[/video]Really, you don't understand the term inflation adjusted debt and your the one laughing, sport.
i disagree..the ticket would have been split and rather than risk a pubster win..the dems are smart enough to team-up in a partisan effort..unlike the pubs and the assclown, divisive, debacle they put on during the debates..What about the primary? If Obama hadn't racked up that number, he never would have beaten Hillary Clinton and she would probably be president right now.
If Obama had gotten 80% of the black vote instead of 85% of the black vote, Hillary Clinton would probably be president right now. What is it you're disagreeing with...?i disagree..the ticket would have been split and rather than risk a pubster win..the dems are smart enough to team-up in a partisan effort..unlike the pubs and the assclown, divisive, debacle they put on during the debates..
What about the primary? If Obama hadn't racked up that number, he never would have beaten Hillary Clinton and she would probably be president right now.
i disagree..the ticket would have been split and rather than risk a pubster win..the dems are smart enough to team-up in a partisan effort..unlike the pubs and the assclown, divisive, debacle they put on during the debates..
you had mentioned "racking up" of a number and nowhere in your quote is the word "black"..to which i responded..BOTH dems are popular..they apparently made a deal..the rest of course, history..then you responded about the "black" vote which was not part of your original post..jus' sayin' dudeIf Obama had gotten 80% of the black vote instead of 85% of the black vote, Hillary Clinton would probably be president right now. What is it you're disagreeing with...?