http://www.davemanuel.com/history-of-deficits-and-surpluses-in-the-united-states.php
| 1998 | $69.2 Billion*Surplus | $99.28 Billion*Surplus | D | R | R |
| 1999 | $125.6 Billion*Surplus | $176.16 Billion*Surplus | D | R | R |
| 2000 | $236.4 Billion*Surplus | $320.76 Billion*Surplus | D | R | R |
| 2001 | $127.3 Billion*Surplus | $168.16 Billion*Surplus | R | D | R |
Citation needed.
I've never smoked GreenCrack before. I heard it was bomb. Or fire. I can never remember the terms.
it's all there for everyone to read.
Ya know buckie, sometimes I'm not sure if you really believe the crap you say or if you're the type of guy that would lie, cheat and deceive to make yourself look good.
Still waiting
did you bother to see where he got his numbers from, dumbass?
then why was he saying the exact same thing i was saying?
you're missing one thing, I never once said a word about inflation.
correct, NLXSK did.
I was quoting you, dumbass.
you were quoting me to tell me how wrong i was for disagreeing with NLXSK's claim that a surplus can vanish based on inflation.
by making the same claim i was?
The national debt and the budget are not synonymous things. If you want to say the national debt never declined, that's fair, but you cannot say there were no budget surpluses because that is factually wrong.sorry bro, that's just not true.
Clinton borrowed money from Social Security to pay down the debt, there was no surplus.
See for yourself.
