The Freedom To Be Fat..Does Government Have The Right To "Outlaw" Unhealthy Foods?

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
Not when the additionally policies are discounted significantly, cmon burgertime.
I have no idea the rates or the business of insurance. Significantly is not enough info here. I am asking so I know wtf is so problematic. I will not be receiving Obamacare so have not been that driven to do my homework. Can you explain how it will affect people negatively? or perhaps who among us stands to benefit? I really don't know.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What the fuck are you babbling about
i'm pointing out the contradiction within your own party, you may not be intelligent enough to realize that you are talking out of both sides of your face.


I'm not the one that went whining to rollitup admin cause I was getting bitch slapped on the forum, ya little Snitch
why don't you go run your little theory by rollitup and see what he says?

something tells me you won't be doing that, unless you want to get BITCH SLAPPED once again.

dumbass.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
LMAO

I know how insurance works see4, the significant part of the equation you left out was the fact that millions of more Americans are joining the pool and are paying substantially lower rates, so please address my original question.

How is the cost of insuring millions of more Americans going to go down?
I'm sorry, I thought I answered your original question. That is how insurance rates go down. More people join the pool of which actuaries adjust rates.

There are many see4 but whats the use, you'll make light of them anyway.
No I won't. If they are legitimate laws that specifically target and regulate doctors, I would like to know. I have not seen any, but if you enlighten me to the fact, I would have no choice but to agree. As long as it is factual.
 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
First, I gave up cigarettes, then I gave up soda pop (all soda pop), then I gave up sugar and as much high fructose as I could, I just gave up caffeine (two weeks ago), now they want me to give trans-fats. I don't have much more to give up and I'm not giving up my MJ no matter what they say.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Ask your auto insurance agent how much your rates will go up if they take on millions of more policies with significantly reduced rates?
My God, are all you progressive this stupid.
Could you enlighten us on the details please. What do you mean, "your rates will go up if they take on millions of more policies with significantly reduced rates"? Can you define significant in this context?
 

see4

Well-Known Member
First, I gave up cigarettes, then I gave up soda pop (all soda pop), then I gave up sugar and as much high fructose as I could, I just gave up caffeine (two weeks ago), now they want me to give trans-fats. I don't have much more to give up and I'm not giving up my MJ no matter what they say.
Who is "they"?
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
I bet they are left wing liberal nazi commies.
...and the Green Party...

and these guys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinoceros_Party
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On August 7, 2007, Sa Tan, then-president of the Rhinoceros Party, announced a $50-million lawsuit contesting an election reform law that had stripped his party of its registered status in 1993.


Sa Tan had planned to run under the Rhino banner in the September 2007 by-election. However, the Liberal government passed a law in 1993 stating registered parties must run candidates in at least 50 ridings, at a cost of $1,000 per riding, to keep their status. In protest of the new law, the party planned to abstain from the election. Canada's then-Chief Electoral Officer, Jean-Pierre Kingsley, rejected the abstention and ordered the party removed from the Registry of Canadian Political Parties. The lawsuit was filed as a result of the removal from the National Party Registry by Mr. Kingsley. Since Mr. Salmi had legally changed his name, the lawsuit was filed as Sa Tan vs. Her Majesty The Queen. The lawsuit was dropped after the ruling of the Chief Electoral Officer was reversed in a new law passed in 2004 that said a party only had to run one candidate in a federal election or federal by-election to be considered registered.[SUP][4][/SUP]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
I am ok with big government banning trans-fats. If you know a bit about health, they literally have no benefit and are almost universally a detriment.
 
Top