My Fellow Blacks, Can I Criticize Dear Leader Now?

Wavels

Well-Known Member
I am not black, however I was tickled by the title of this article that was in the biased American Thinker.
Regardless of the source of this obvious opinion piece, the author makes some great points (IMO).

I realize that the Obama sycophants on RIU will vilify the source, thereby eliminating any need to rebut any of the the points made in the article.


Before committing the blasphemous and daring act of openly criticizing Dear Leader, it is obligatory that I first purify my spirit by reciting Dear Leader's prayer.

That way, the Black community doesn't condemn my soul for placing critical thinking over Black solidarity. It's common knowledge that Blacks who criticize Dear Leader are considered "sell-outs" while Whites are labeled "racists."

Even the Congressional Black Caucus knows that Dear Leader is untouchable. Congresswoman Maxine Waters once confessed to a Detroit crowd:
"We don't put pressure on the president, let me tell you why. We don't put pressure on the president because ya'll love the president. You love the president. You're very proud...to have a black man [in the White House] ...First time in the history of the United States of America. If we go after the president too hard, you're going after us."

In short,Dear Leader could authorize drone strikes in the hood and Blacks would accept it without question.

Herman Cain, on the other hand, isn't even allowed to deliver pizzas there without being questioned.

Anyway, without further ado, in this manner I pray:
Our Father who art in the White House, hallowed be thy name. Thy Constitution-less Kingdom come, thy will be done, in America as it is in the hood. Give us this day, our daily handouts and forgive our criminality, although we won't forgive the White man for criminalizing us. And lead us not into self-sufficiency, but deliver us from patriotism. For thine is the Constitution-less kingdom, and the power, and the glory forever and ever and ever and ever.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/my_fellow_blacks_can_i_criticize_dear_leader_now.html#ixzz2kMEWtvyP
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook





Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/my_fellow_blacks_can_i_criticize_dear_leader_now.html#ixzz2kMEEvS3p
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I watched the Bad news Bears last night for the first time since 1976, I forgot that the kids used the "N" word numerous times. None of the adults do.

Must be racist children who play baseball.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
I watched the Bad news Bears last night for the first time since 1976, I forgot that the kids used the "N" word numerous times. None of the adults do.

Must be racist children who play baseball.
You do realize that Tatum O'Neal and her co-stars are roughly the same age as Obama. They are now grown-up racists.

I watched this movie again a few years ago and was highly amused by the chronic boozing of the quite talented Walter Matthau.

Good flick.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
You do realize that Tatum O'Neal and her co-stars are roughly the same age as Obama. They are now grown-up racists.

I watched this movie again a few years ago and was highly amused by the chronic boozing of the quite talented Walter Matthau.

Good flick.
Haha yeah, the movie starts out with him opening a Budweiser ( pull top no less) and drinking while coaching. He lets all the kids have a beer too, while none of the parents say anything. No one ever wears a seat belt, smoking is ok anywhere, indoors or out. Heck even the 12 year old kids are smoking. The cars were HUGE and got 10 MPG, but fuel was like 67 cents per gallon. Times sure have changed.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Haha yeah, the movie starts out with him opening a Budweiser ( pull top no less) and drinking while coaching. He lets all the kids have a beer too, while none of the parents say anything. No one ever wears a seat belt, smoking is ok anywhere, indoors or out. Heck even the 12 year old kids are smoking. The cars were HUGE and got 10 MPG, but fuel was like 67 cents per gallon. Times sure have changed.
Anyone old enough to have watched that movie when it first came out, and has not seen it since it's initial release, is in for a shocking revelation as to just HOW MUCH things have changed.

And I must add, that change is certainly not always for the better.

IMHO.:leaf:
 

travisw

Well-Known Member
I am not black, however I was tickled by the title of this article that was in the biased American Thinker.
Regardless of the source of this obvious opinion piece, the author makes some great points (IMO).

I realize that the Obama sycophants on RIU will vilify the source, thereby eliminating any need to rebut any of the the points made in the article.


Before committing the blasphemous and daring act of openly criticizing Dear Leader, it is obligatory that I first purify my spirit by reciting Dear Leader's prayer.

That way, the Black community doesn't condemn my soul for placing critical thinking over Black solidarity. It's common knowledge that Blacks who criticize Dear Leader are considered "sell-outs" while Whites are labeled "racists."

Even the Congressional Black Caucus knows that Dear Leader is untouchable. Congresswoman Maxine Waters once confessed to a Detroit crowd:
"We don't put pressure on the president, let me tell you why. We don't put pressure on the president because ya'll love the president. You love the president. You're very proud...to have a black man [in the White House] ...First time in the history of the United States of America. If we go after the president too hard, you're going after us."

In short,Dear Leader could authorize drone strikes in the hood and Blacks would accept it without question.

Herman Cain, on the other hand, isn't even allowed to deliver pizzas there without being questioned.

Anyway, without further ado, in this manner I pray:
Our Father who art in the White House, hallowed be thy name. Thy Constitution-less Kingdom come, thy will be done, in America as it is in the hood. Give us this day, our daily handouts and forgive our criminality, although we won't forgive the White man for criminalizing us. And lead us not into self-sufficiency, but deliver us from patriotism. For thine is the Constitution-less kingdom, and the power, and the glory forever and ever and ever and ever.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/my_fellow_blacks_can_i_criticize_dear_leader_now.html#ixzz2kMEWtvyP
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook





Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/my_fellow_blacks_can_i_criticize_dear_leader_now.html#ixzz2kMEEvS3p
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
More great points from your go to choice for ideological driven media. Obama is a moron because he watches Homeland didn't have the gravitas you hoped for, so now you bring us great points like Obama could authorize drone strikes in the hood.

You don't have to be an Obama sycophant to realize your "source" is still a joke.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Haha yeah, the movie starts out with him opening a Budweiser ( pull top no less) and drinking while coaching. He lets all the kids have a beer too, while none of the parents say anything. No one ever wears a seat belt, smoking is ok anywhere, indoors or out. Heck even the 12 year old kids are smoking. The cars were HUGE and got 10 MPG, but fuel was like 67 cents per gallon. Times sure have changed.
In the 60s i remember (East Coast) prices as in the 30 to 40-cent range per gallon. The energy crisis pushed that to 50 and 60 cents, which at the time was scandalous. And our cars got between 18 (the station wagon with the 289) and 30 (the Mercedes 230, a lineal ancestor of today's C-class) mpg. Only the fools driving muscle cars and 400+ cid Lincs and Caddies got ten mpg iirc.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
More great points from your go to choice for ideological driven media. Obama is a moron because he watches Homeland didn't have the gravitas you hoped for, so now you bring us great points like Obama could authorize drone strikes in the hood.

You don't have to be an Obama sycophant to realize your "source" is still a joke.
How are you seemingly unable to differentiate between "source" and specific "points"?
Very convenient, dismiss the source, and the points become nonexistent. Soo easy.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
In the 60s i remember (East Coast) prices as in the 30 to 40-cent range per gallon. The energy crisis pushed that to 50 and 60 cents, which at the time was scandalous. And our cars got between 18 (the station wagon with the 289) and 30 (the Mercedes 230, a lineal ancestor of today's C-class) mpg. Only the fools driving muscle cars and 400+ cid Lincs and Caddies got ten mpg iirc.
I started driving in 1970. Many of my friends had cars that only obtained 10 mpg or less. These were admittedly, muscle cars(GTOs and 442s) I had a motorcycle back then that only had a 1.8 gal tank, I could fill it up for less than 75 cents.

I think that it was more inexpensive to drive a muscle car in those days then it is to drive a Prius now.

I also contend that muscle cars are way more fun to drive than any Prius that has yet been manufactured.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I despise the Prius. I cannot get one in a tiny Turbodiesel and with a manual transmission. My current ride is a Honda Fit, the most fuel-efficient new car with a clutch pedal being sold here in the States today. i envy the Europeans with their 60-70mpg Diesel hatchbacks.

My dad never bothered to get a muscle car. Not the family man thing to do. There were some interesting car choices in the golden days before OPEC, even after discounting the drag-racing specialists that seem to hog all the admiration today. ~shrug~

What bike was it? Back then your choice iirc was a big Harley, something English with mid-displacement or tiny Japanese sewing machines ... neeeneeeEEEEEngeeee...
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
In the 60s i remember (East Coast) prices as in the 30 to 40-cent range per gallon. The energy crisis pushed that to 50 and 60 cents, which at the time was scandalous. And our cars got between 18 (the station wagon with the 289) and 30 (the Mercedes 230, a lineal ancestor of today's C-class) mpg. Only the fools driving muscle cars and 400+ cid Lincs and Caddies got ten mpg iirc.
My company wagon has a 6.1 Hemi and it gets way better than 10mpg. I can rod through an entire tank and still get 13-14, and 22-23 if I just cruise it.

Did those old beasts really only get 10mpg, or was that when you put your foot down constantly? Driven many of them for customers, but Im not the one paying for fuel at the end of the day so I have no clue.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
I despise the Prius. I cannot get one in a tiny Turbodiesel and with a manual transmission. My current ride is a Honda Fit, the most fuel-efficient new car with a clutch pedal being sold here in the States today. i envy the Europeans with their 60-70mpg Diesel hatchbacks.

My dad never bothered to get a muscle car. Not the family man thing to do. There were some interesting car choices in the golden days before OPEC, even after discounting the drag-racing specialists that seem to hog all the admiration today. ~shrug~

What bike was it? Back then your choice iirc was a big Harley, something English with mid-displacement or tiny Japanese sewing machines ... neeeneeeEEEEEngeeee...
Holy macaroni, your post sure has me reelin' in the years...I am getting old.

My first bike was a Suzuki 125 Duster, dual purpose fun machine...1.8 gallon fuel tank, I could go forever on one tank...at least it seemed like it. And yes, it had a little two stroke sewing machine engine with oodles of torque, and great mileage.

My next bike was a Suzuki 380GT, much faster than the little bike, mileage not as good, but more death defying merriment was provided.

The first car I bought was a 1975 Honda Civic...and strangely enough I have been considering buying a new Honda Fit...
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
I despise the Prius. I cannot get one in a tiny Turbodiesel and with a manual transmission. My current ride is a Honda Fit, the most fuel-efficient new car with a clutch pedal being sold here in the States today. i envy the Europeans with their 60-70mpg Diesel hatchbacks.

My dad never bothered to get a muscle car. Not the family man thing to do. There were some interesting car choices in the golden days before OPEC, even after discounting the drag-racing specialists that seem to hog all the admiration today. ~shrug~

What bike was it? Back then your choice iirc was a big Harley, something English with mid-displacement or tiny Japanese sewing machines ... neeeneeeEEEEEngeeee...
Left hand wet clutch is the way to go. :)
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
My company wagon has a 6.1 Hemi and it gets way better than 10mpg. I can rod through an entire tank and still get 13-14, and 22-23 if I just cruise it.

Did those old beasts really only get 10mpg, or was that when you put your foot down constantly? Driven many of them for customers, but Im not the one paying for fuel at the end of the day so I have no clue.

LOL, I think a lot of the miserable gas mileage in those days was heavy foot syndrome...stop light racing was way fun, and even with a heavy foot and dual quads, we spent much less in those days to have some real fun with our cars.

Is there even such a thing as Sunday or recreational driving anymore?:-P
 

beenthere

New Member
Holy macaroni, your post sure has me reelin' in the years...I am getting old.

My first bike was a Suzuki 125 Duster, dual purpose fun machine...1.8 gallon fuel tank, I could go forever on one tank...at least it seemed like it. And yes, it had a little two stroke sewing machine engine with oodles of torque, and great mileage.

My next bike was a Suzuki 380GT, much faster than the little bike, mileage not as good, but more death defying merriment was provided.

The first car I bought was a 1975 Honda Civic...and strangely enough I have been considering buying a new Honda Fit...
And stowin away the time.

My first street legal bike was a candy red Kawasaki mach III I think it was a 1974 or 5.

I thought that bike was bonneville salt flats material. My older brother had a sportster and talked endless shit about my Kawi.
I raced him twice, the first one he blamed on starting in first gear, the next race was so embarrassing for him, we never raced again. Oh those were the days.
 

Wavels

Well-Known Member
And stowin away the time.

My first street legal bike was a candy red Kawasaki mach III I think it was a 1974 or 5.

I thought that bike was bonneville salt flats material. My older brother had a sportster and talked endless shit about my Kawi.
I raced him twice, the first one he blamed on starting in first gear, the next race was so embarrassing for him, we never raced again. Oh those were the days.
LOL, my 380 never lost any race to a Harley....off of the line...

My little brother had a blue Kawasaki 2 stroke 750...it ate Norton Commandos for breakfast...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Holy macaroni, your post sure has me reelin' in the years...I am getting old.

My first bike was a Suzuki 125 Duster, dual purpose fun machine...1.8 gallon fuel tank, I could go forever on one tank...at least it seemed like it. And yes, it had a little two stroke sewing machine engine with oodles of torque, and great mileage.

My next bike was a Suzuki 380GT, much faster than the little bike, mileage not as good, but more death defying merriment was provided.

The first car I bought was a 1975 Honda Civic...and strangely enough I have been considering buying a new Honda Fit...
I am very very pleased with my Fit. It's comfy, thrifty and gets the job done. My first new car was an '85 CRX and this is that with room for two more adults.
I didn't buy my first bike 'til the mid-80s. by then, the Japanese had totally caught up displacementwise and were the Godzillas of speed and power. So what did I do? My first new bike was a Harley!!
 
Top