Oh I'm sorry. Is moving into the future too much reading for you?
It was quite a bit of reading actually, some of which started so far in the past as to be needing update. Dr Atomic's marijuana multiplier by Todd, as well as Cannabis Alchemy under the name Gold, and Marijuana Chemistry by Starks are all excellent starting points for research, but none current or to pharmaceutical standards.
This is a good forum for helping you become current in those areas, and looks like you have some research that would benefit the forum, if it were presented in a more palatable format. As a suggestion, consider just your post #2 for instance and how it could be improved with numbering, spacing, and indenting??
Also noting that with your above quote, you slammed the door to communication and opened the one to antagonism. Did that achieve your intended goal?
Reading the end, and beginning, but skipping the middle, it looks like your intended message, good, bad, or indifferent, has been scattered to the winds, and the focus has been on personalities.
If your response didn't positively serve your intended purpose, how would you do it differently next time?