Search results

It appears to me that you and a few others in this thread are ready to convict Zimmerman. Without seeing all the evidence, I might add! I've been accused of defending Zimmerman (I'd really like someone to show me anywhere that I've said "Trayvon deserved it" or that "I think Zimmerman is...

*Sigh* Yeah, and I like to read tea leaves and visit psychics. So what? :roll: So, because someone has a "history", it makes them atomatically guilty? Some of you guys on here really worry me.:-?

Thank you!!!!!:clap: This is pretty much all I've been trying to say. Evidently I've not been articulating well. :-(

Dude, I took shit for "defending" Casey Anthony too. And I despise that bitch! But there was little to ZERO hard evidence she did it. I predicted that she would walk. She walked. That's all I'm doing here is looking at this from a legal standpoint. If it were the other way around and Trayvon had...

No, I'm NOT defending Zimmerman. Yet another person telling me what I'm doing.:roll: And I'll defend whomever I damn well please my friend! You stop defending Trayvon! See how that works? A lot of people are ready to convict a man with little to no evidence of a crime. Yes, a young kid is...

Easily discerned, or proven? Proof doesn't typically have to be "easily discerned". It usually stares you right in the face. Credible eyewitness testimony or video would likely constitute "proof". This is nothing more than speculation based on, what, some words on a tape and an "X" on a map...

Where the fuck do you get this shit? lmfao!!!!!! You DO realize how all these ASSumptions are making you look right now? :dunce: I'll explain (again); Edited transcripts often don't give the entire picture. This has already happened in the media where an edited 911 transcript made it look like...

Where is the PROOF that he followed after he was ordered not to? I'm not talking about edited 911 tapes either. And even if he did, the fact that the dispatcher cannot give lawful orders makes it IRRELEVANT!

lol! Yep, I'm having a BLAST!!!!! :clap: I can't tell if you're being obtuse or you just don't get it...........:?

OMFG!!!!!!! The police never "ordered" Zimmerman to stop! Even the dispatcher never "ordered" him to stop. The dispatcher CANNOT order anyone to do anything! He/she can "strongly recommend" or "strongly suggest". They cannot give "lawful orders". Sheesh!!!!:wall:

Noooooo.......what I'm saying is there was evidence that PROVED she was lying so she was convicted of lying! lol! Seriously people? Suddenly a track record = guilt of a crime? This is so fucking scary on so many levels bro! :shock: Let's play devil's advocate for a moment shall we? Let's make...

What are you talking about? Where do I say "partying and lying = murder"?:? The point I was trying to make (which you've obviously missed) was that the prosecution had a shitload of "theories" and "evidence" against Casey Anthony, INCLUDING, damning testimony from her own father. She was not...

Really???? Because Casey Anthony's own parents thought she had something to do with her daughter's disappearance and subsequent death. She had a history of partying and lying and pretty much everything she told the police turned out to be fiction. SHE didn't get convicted, so there goes that...

lmfao!!!!!!! You don't have to worry about ME entering law enforcement!:dunce: I've read all of your recent posts in this thread and I GET what you're saying.........and I'm saying that "far more likely" does not equal "guilty". And thank GOD, because there would likely be even MORE innocent...

lmfao!!!!!!! Damn, I'm hot!!!!

No jury is going to convict him based on past arrests without any other HARD EVIDENCE, such as credible eyewitness testimony or video. Past convictions? Maybe, but we aren't talking convictions here. Just because something was one way in the past does not make it so in the present. Maybe...

Barking at you? Hardly. It's called having a debate. Don't like what I have to say? Too fucking bad! I've sat on a jury before my friend. You are making an awful lot of assumptions about me, yet you don't know a thing about me. I realize that innocent people get sent to prison and vice versa...

Huh? Yeah, that's what I said......I was laughing at your 'weak sauce' comparison of the Bible and the merits of Christianity to the photo of Zimmerman's injuries and the credibility of said evidence. It was laughable. Sorry, I call 'em like I see 'em!

No, but we enjoy the presumption of innocence until PROVEN guilty in a court of law. Just because a person is arrested for a crime means little if there is no conviction or plea deal. If he wasn't convicted then all of that shit is irrelevant. I'm guessing his attorney will have that shit...

I think he means they planned to charge with manslaughter but they must have found some evidence that makes the prosecution think they will get a murder 2 conviction. What some people don't seem to realize is that you go for the big "trophy" and maybe you'll get it. If not, there are a lot of...