Search results

And when Trump figures out how to go back in time and "defeat ISIS in 30 days."

I'll take my personal nuke now please! What could go wrong?

The non-gun owning majority is protecting themselves from the offensive force of the gun owning minority. Or does the negligence and irresponsibility of gun owners not count as offensive force?

You are a fucking idiot. Go eat some more roadkill and work on your idea of using "defensive force" preemptively against people you percieve as too controlling. Worthless hypocrite.

You can hold Democrats accountable without equating them with Republicans. Republicans benefit from rhetoric that equates the parties. Democrats are nowhere near as blatantly misleading and misanthropic as Republicans.

You are going to have to face down your delusions yourself.

Another straw man. My views on the government center on accountability. Government is a tool, it is what we make of it. It is the misuse of government that is the problem, not government itself. The government isn't some sovereign entity, it is accountable to the people and is comprised of the...

I wonder how stupid and destitute your kids would be without public education.

That isn't reality, just your twisted delusion. Enjoy!

No, that's why I vote D.

And now we get back to explicit consent. Citizens chose to live under the law and sacrifice some bodily autonomy, specifically the autonomy to harm others, in exchange for protection, prosperity, etc.

No, not really. Sounds about right. Did you have a point? I've already stated I take the good with the bad and it's worth it. Better than your shithole of anarchy.

Telling conservatives what they want to hear while he does the opposite to get peoples' focus off of guns/the NRA.

If he means we just need better mental health services and public funding to ensure that, then I'd agree. There needs to be medically legitimate diagnoses, oversight to ensure fair treatment, due process, etc. but if it was done right, I would probably support funding some public inpatient...

Not to be rude, but it seems you do not grasp the nuances of my argument. Say a person threatened to rape and kill you and your family members. They sit outside your house every day lurking menacingly and shouting about how they would harm you. They shot a bullet once, it whizzed past your...

Then why did you equate guns to knives, rocks, hammers? You contradict yourself, which was the point of my rhetorical question. Guns are the most deadly, made for killing. Not very successful because of the Republican constituency. Republicans are relentless in their fight to grow the MIC to...

Thank you, sir. I held back as long as I could, but now I had to unleash the fury of a thousand blasting projectiles.

What do you think? Do you think that is an apt analogy? She was being hyperbolic and her grievance was illegitimate. Do you honestly think the same of civil rights for woman and minorities?

Your analogy in the first paragraph simply isn't true. It would be more like holding down the bully to make him talk it out with people he was being bigoted against as to eradicate prejudice and bigotry and create a peaceful resolution. Big difference, but you know that. We are talking about...

I think you might have a serious self-awareness problem. My misunderstanding of your ideals is the least of my concerns when it comes to our conversations. Are you leading to an example of legitimate authority? Arbitrary authority, like weed prohibition, occurs under the status quo, and it is...