Search results

Yeah, just wishful thinking that he gets nothing done for however long the process takes and then Pence is left with a broken party with a minority in Congress after 2018 elections.

I'm being greedy cause I hate Republicans so much and love to see them have to oppose their own president. But even beyond his criminal guilt, he is a symbol of right wing ignorance, arrogance, deceitfulness, racism, and sexism. He has to go, there is no doubt. There will be backlash, the right...

He deserves to be impeached and imprisoned, but from a strategy perspective, and as long as he doesn't fuck us too hard and continues to flounder, it would benefit the left to let him destroy the GOP a little more and reduce the risk of Pence (like if Pence was limited to 9 months in office or...

My point was to show the inherent contradictions and subjectivity of defensive force, as well as the nonsense of thinking anarchy is more conductive to justice than law and order under democracy. I don't recall restitution being the original issue, but it is a complicated argument to make...

You aren't recovering it from the theif. Stop moving the goal post. You said you don't think guilt is transferable from individual to another, so if the theif sold it to somebody else or gave it to a family member or friend, it follows that the new person would be using defensive force against...

So you won't be using offensive force or calling on a central authority to get your home or car back if the theif sells your home or car to a third party or simple gives it go their children, their sibling, or their friend?

How is it hard for you to follow that logic? Multi-generational feuds between families are common even today. How long qualifies "long dead"? Time is relative, what you consider long is subjective. Are you saying we need a central authority to declare and enforce a statute of limitations? Also...

You never answered how you will get restitution for your stolen car. Are you planning on using offensive force?

What if the theif that stole your car was an abolitionist ? Or a slave ? Or both ? Was that a brain fart? Are you saying if you have a certain identity or beliefs that you don't have to abide by the NAP?

It's based on your recent, direct genetic lineage and the fact that you are still benefitting from their use of offensive force, not on your race. Libertarianism isn't complicated, it's retarded.

Sure, why not? In the scenario you describe there is no government to enforce any private property rights or any other social construct. Time is a social construct (as are statutory limitations), family exists in nature and therefore your blood makes you guilty, at least subjectively. If they...

You maintain the benefits of the offensive force they used. If someone stole your car and sold it to me, would it be offensive force for you to take it back from me?

How is that any more ridiculous than any of the rest of your libertarian delusion?

LOL you two faced son-of-a-bitch troll! Your ancestors used offensive force, but you can't be held accountable after the sun went down so many times, right?

Did you not read what you posted? See: Reply section. Tacit dissent is the word your example used. Tacit consent is an odd, abstract concept, but it's not what I've beem arguing; tacit consent is the straw man you are arguing against. I've been arguing affirmed consent, aka actions and/or words...

I'm not sure I've ever talked to someone who claims to be an anarcho-communist, either in real life or on the internet.

Yeah, because it's just that we don't like people stupid enough to fall for fascist and racist rhetoric, flat-eath conspiracy, and holocaust denial, not that they verifiably believe this shit and that we are calling them out for being that stupid and arrogant. But hey, someone has to defend...

"America Fuck Yeah!" is the mantra of the right wing here. That opinion of us really took an uptick during Bush with the destabilization of the Middle East. It hasn't recovered much, especially now with Trump, and Obama only helped slightly as any real challenge to "America Fuck Yeah!" was...

How was the post you quoted underhanded? They seemed like straightforward questions asking for more evidence. I've yet to see you argue flat-earth theory thoroughly. Disappointing to see you pull up short.

Why resort to conspiracy when the truth will do to make the same point? The absurdity of the conspiracy theorists is that they are so sure of a particular theory. That's not very scientific to begin with. They already have the conclusion and it starts with their desire to be better than everyone...