Search results

That argument makes no sense. You can't imagine what tacit dissent looks like? How about revoking your citizenship, refusing to use any public utility (roads, police, waterlines, powerlines, etc.), leaving the country, or any sort of affirmation that you aren't just a hypocritical mooch? Have...

The level of intricate understanding it would take for the average European to confidently argue 9-11 conspiracy equates to an obsession. How many Americans do you think could articulate a conspiracy in any Country outside the US? I would say most Europeans aren't that arrogant, or at least I...

Really? Huh, didn't realize foreigners were so obsessed with 9-11. Two likes from conspiracy nuts, I guess they must be foreigners?

So those retarded memes aren't evidence? The only website I've seen that meme on lays out the most ridiculous and fallacious argument I may have ever seen. http://deanodle.org/articles/article/41/gods-flat-earth-the-firmament-of-his-power "I heard God and he said all them there scientists are...

But you haven't been conditioned/tricked into thinking the earth is flat? The evidence you provide can be debunked by a 5th grader.

Or the other option. Actually, definitely the other option. You parroting an idiot like Sullivan makes perfect sense.

By Andrew Sullivan.

You know, you can just search that conspiracy on google. It is completely debunked.

I didn't read the article lol. Breitbart is pure horse shit. You have a point, though. But why are bots, totally unconnected to you, spamming the internet with this shit?

Or one of the other possibilities. Even your dumbass knows what you are doing. Disingenuous. So you copy and pasted it. Thanks for the straightforward answer.

There is no argument worth addressing. The truth is ridiculously far from every Democrat being 100% committed to throwing every measure of immigration policy away in favor of unlimited open borders. Closer to the truth, is that Democrats want to preserve family units, help people in need that...

Wtf is your avatar? Do you have that page bookmarked or something? You came back with that pretty fast. And if Buck were gay, wouldn't you making him aware of health risks actually help him make better choices? You work in mysterious ways.

Wow, you sure are bold today. Higher risk to preventable problems = desperate and pathetic? Makes no sense. How many times a day do you think about homosexuality?

lol desperate and pathetic.

Then you will accuse the left of supporting a wall 20 years ago. Fool.

One did give consent, wouldn't you say consent has been given? How is tacit consent not real consent? Again, a parent did give consent. She is threatened with jail because she did not follow a court order where she lost. If both parents hadn't consented, no court order, no jail time.

Conservatives from Texas are the worst.

Both sides share blame.

Your first sentence/paragraph doesn't make sense. Maybe you meant "was" instead of "can." Why do you think consent has not been given? What do you qualify as "real consent?" I think I understand your question and am addressing it. IMO, you are not confronting my argument directly and instead...

That person or their parents have consented and subscribed them to the authority of the law. A society of law might limit bodily autonomy in cases where bodily autonomy results in the hurting of oneself directly and others indirectly, or when it directly affects others.