Search results

lol stoned bastard.

Vaccines are to protect the lives of others. Your rights end where another's begin. It is not your right to start the next epidemic.

Idiot.

You love authoritarian Putin, though. What's up with that?

What argument is poor?

Yep, it's hard being the people, it really is. Especially with the anti-intellectual (including science) and anti-government (or "small" government) rhetoric that is so popular with the right, as well as the general apathy and hate of hope, which undermine the people's aptness to do so. Then you...

Your argument is very rational. But in a health insurance system, or really any healthcare system where doctors treat all life threatening events, the 500lb guy's health problems will likely cost everyone else a little more if he cannot afford those health problems.

Comparing pedophilia with vaccines is completely idiotic. Better?

That you four idiots think this is true makes you literally mentally retarded. And no, not because of vaccines.

That you three idiots actually find this logical at worst and funny at best makes you pathetic losers.

It is the responsibility of the people to hold it accountable when it does, not to throw out the entire premise of democracy.

The questions are argumentative, sure, but your answers can also help to understand your point of view. When you won't continue down our line of reasoning by not addressing my next arguments, it is unfair to say I simply don't understand your point of view. I think my points were fair, so when...

Which scientists are those? To me, it would be the shills working for the oil companies that are hardly accredited, if at all, and put opinion/false science over the scientific method and standards. I tend to trust the scientists that use multiple measure points, are open to peer review, and...

Good luck. These guys have no problem using every fallacy to avoid conceding any good argument you make.

You are creating the diatribe, dumbass. My position is to make people pay for how much they pollute. They are responsible for the pollution they produce. You have no cause but to hate anyone that wants justice of any kind if it upsets the people that have tricked you into a false ideology. They...

So no counter arguments? Does that mean you agree? If not, why? Pointing me to that website looks like a concession.

Except literally every scientists wants to study the effects of marijuana and guns to get a better understanding but big industry makes laws that prevent it. Scientists are not the problem.

Yeah, big industry, which happens to be where you get your spoon fed "information" from to discredit those that criticize big industry.

See how the second part says "ideas" to mislead from the fact that those ideas are to deprive women and minorities of rights?

They are taxing the companies based on how much they pollute. The far left might just shut them down but a slow overhaul was the compromise the left made with big business, and also as common sense to not plunge the global economy.