Search results

My brother said it was almost too easy to get his here in Oregon, I haven't gotten mine yet. We both took hunter safety at a young age, but I don't think it is required for legal adults. I mostly agree with your point, though I think the majority of cops are decent people, and I'd hope they...

For the lady's sake, make the argument.

Cops train and abide by a higher standard of ethics, at least theoretically. I think citizens would benefit greatly from gun licensing similar to car licensing.

That is a more fair and nuanced stance.

You forfeit absolute freedom when you agree to live in a society of law. But you already knew that. Disingenuous.

But the government has no right to punish a slaveholder when slavery was democratically decided to be a crime?

I believe if you act within a society you have accepted the laws of, you should rightfully expect to follow those laws, and if you break those laws face consequences proportional to your actions. You act like the government uses capital punishment for every crime. Disingenuous.

I'm in no rush to hear more of your bullshit. Take all of eternity if you wish.

Those monikers are a perfect reflection of your character. You pretend like you fight fair, you don't. Hypocrite.

You are avoiding the point again. More disingenous hypocrisy. What exactly do you expect blacks to do when the society they live in declares open season on them and denies them all rights and services? You will say it's not up to you to determine, that you can't fathom the logical conclusion...

Rob Roy is stuck in a loop. In every thread he puts up his shitty arguments, gets defeated logically, he gradually gets more and more vague and cryptic, then he claims victory and disappears.

Didn't you just say you hated Lincoln because he thought blacks should leave America as they would never get whites to willingly associate with them? Isn't that pretty much what you believe too?

Gullible to what? You think being vague and cryptic is clever, it's not. You are a spineless coward feigning enlightenment. You belong to the cult of thoughtless hypocrisy.

Still no evidence, no substance, just bullshit. Your beliefs are about feeling good, you stand for nothing. I'll wait for your evidence. But you will probably just claim victory like you always do. You are right wing by definition, but even they are disgraced by you.

To part 1, isn't the government using defensive force in the case of depriving a felon with guns? They are defending the right to life of other individuals, as decided by a democracy. To part 2, you are undoubtedly a piece of shit for that opinion.

Lol you provide no evidence, can't name one law, just some vague statement about how he didn't change the law so convicted felons could own guns, then you claim victory. Typical right wing tactics. Are you really this dumb?

Just explain your usage when you give an example.

Which law is that?

We can go with infringe, sometimes vocab escapes me. So go ahead with infringe.

If not associating means them denying basic rights and services to a racial minority on a mass scale, then yes.