Search results

Interesting that you can't just say yes or no.

Why does it matter whether he was doing anything wrong or not?

Marriage has a legal definition. It doesn't need to be changed to give gay couples 100% legal rights. Why should that not be acceptable? The answer is because they don't just want "their" rights, they want to hurt others along the way.

I can't stop laughing at that. Please tell me you meant that as a joke!

Why are you being so defensive? You can admit it here.

Yes, if Zimmerman had only cared for Martin's life, he would have done the right thing and let Martin kill him without fighting back. If nobody knows who started the confrontation, where do you get murder 2? How does the prosecution prove it wasn't self defense? How does it even go to trial? It...

Buck, are you gay?

I hear them now: "We are queer, we are gay we're costing Obama more votes to-day!"

Well, if nobody even knows who started the confrontation, where do you get murder 2? You don't have any idea what murder 2 requires do you?

One person's big deal is another person's small deal. Sure, just let marriage be redefined. Why not make it legal for anyone to just call themselves male or female regardless of biology while we're at it?

Nobody knows who started it and nobody ever will. It's not even relevant to the case at hand. Don't you even know a lawyer who could give you a few basics so you don't keep making such a fool of yourself?

One thing is for sure - the gay marriage issue is hurting Obama. So I say, keep harping on it!

"There is no evidence we know of that Mr Zimmerman provoked a confrontation or fight." I guess you read that differently, eh? ps name calling is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully

The term marriage is of great importance. That's the whole issue.

Why has the prosecution said there is no evidence that Zimmerman provoked a fight? If you have the guts to stay with me on this, I'll show everyone who is fucking dumb. But I suspect they already know. And fo course you can chase someone down (even though that didn't happen" and claim self...

Sure, everyone should have the same rights. A gay couple should have the same rights as a married couple. But they should NOT have the right to redefine a word and an institution that has been a backbone of civilization for 10,000 years.

I have long been supportive of gays. But the way they have acted over the gay marriage issue disgusts me. Civil union with exactly equal rights isn't good enough for them. They have to use the word marriage and for no other reason to get in the face of traditional society. They have pissed me...

It's the status quo because it is Zimmerman's testimony and there is no evidence to refute it. So if this went to trial, and it won't, the jury would operate under the assumption that Martin said it. This devolves from the prosecution's burden to prove it was NOT self defense. Part of that is...

You have it backwards you big silly! Provide links.

I don't know where you are coming up with this. Perhaps you could provide a link? It is true that you have no criminal record without a conviction, but that's not presumption of innocence, that's common sense. Presumption of innocence is the basis for the allocation of burden of proof. Z doesn't...