Search results

ablackhorse.com is getting rid of Zoo Med Flora Suns for 10.59 a pop for the PAR T5 growers out there be easy thats for the 4'ers

Hey FM, I was thinking about reducing the intake side of your design to a 4" opening so i can straight mount it to my grow tent's 4" vent holes. Would you think that reduction is going to create too much static/air friction to make this a useful design? I was thnking i could probably add a 2nd...

Hey FatMarty, I know this is kind of an old thread but i just wanted to say, thanks for this man, helps me out a ton!

I'll go a step further and say its definitely wrong to enact that double standard. we all have to get over the moral hangups we've been taught to have about sex. not saying we should all be fucking all the time, i'm just saying talking about sex needs to become de-taboo'd, and value judgements...

This is what's up... thanks fonzi! be easy

For sure, thats why i'm hankerin for em!

I'll second this hard, but i've been looking for a week now and i can't find any of these at any of the usual suspect sites be easy

Careful Kaendar, you admitted to only reading half the thread so you're about to get flamed by a bunch of people. also, I find it interesting that this was your take on the thread. Quite literally, I find it interesting. If you finish the thread please comment on whether you maintain your...

well done, indeed

lets not start this again...

yes, i conceded. you are right. I am wrong.

alright, you guys are right. be easy.

for now. we'll see how it goes if you deny that there is value in the metaphysical forever. of course we wouldn't be able to prove it. on your death bed you'll never know whether it was a better life or a worse life without any metaphysical investigation. be easy

the metaphysical.

yes, absolutely. IF your proposition is that its a waste of time to do anything besides investigate physical reality.

is only has more appeal for you. that's a preference. and when you start questioning what is, and find there are aspects of that "is" outside of the physical, how will you approach those things?

no, i meant except. as in you disregard all things that are not scientifically provable.

note it is the approximation, not the co-incidence (purposefully written with hyphen so as not to get bound in the cultural attachments surrounding the word coincedence). I contend that interpretation is inherently bracketed within the physical. to apply the tools of the physical to the...

I think you mean you don't see how my reasoning seems logical, but i'm not sure which reasoning you're talking about now?

Not scoffing at ya bro, just giving you a little tweak, didn't realize you were that sensitive...i do believe some others have tried to point out the provincial aspects of your posts as well, but i'm fine taking the brunt. be easy