Search results

  1. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Boycott all LPS folks dont sign up or buy from any of them..well unless thats your only and final option
  2. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Derek Francisco Canadian Cannabis Consulting http://canadiancannabisconsulting.ca Canadian Cannabis Legal Defence Resource http://ccldr.net Upper Canada Pot Society http://uppercanadapotsociety.ca/ Central Ontario Mobile Marijuana Patient Alliance Cooperator http://commpac.ca...
  3. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    http://cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-2030-13
  4. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Plain as I can put it folks.
  5. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    R v. Parker 2000
  6. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    The accused's liberty interest was engaged by the marijuana prohibition. The threat of criminal prosecution and possible imprisonment itself amounted to a risk of deprivation of liberty and, therefore, had to accord with the principles of fundamental justice. Further, liberty includes the right...
  7. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    * A permanent constitutional exemption from ss.4 and 7 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act for the Applicant, who is medically approved under the Narcotic Control Regulations (NCR), the MMAR or the MMPR,*until such further Order of the court; The MMPR unreasonably restricts the s. 7...
  8. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Canadian Constitutional Law. Courts are not allowed to do what the OCA did in Hitzig; says Hogg,*"the courts may not reconstruct an unconstitutional statute in order to render it constitutional."*There ought to come a point at which a court "will recognize that an unconstitutional statute cannot...
  9. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Thanks Canadian..just fighting the good fight.. like veryine else ;)
  10. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    keep your heads up and your sticks on the ice folks!! :) we will all be fine.
  11. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    we dont need permission for fuck all..we have the final say in our medical care in this country..harpers gone by spring so..things are looking up already..;)
  12. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    im permanently disabled and my illnesses are for life..why should I have to reaply..why should aby of us??
  13. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Just swamp the courts ppl!!!! yes every win for us is a win for all ! ;)
  14. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    im not asking to be part of any program..I want a lifelime exemption from 4 7 cdsa for medical puposes. Take care folks! Keep me posted!! I have some potting to do!!;) Oh ya HC says use cat litter to destroy my plants? Any know were I can get 974 jugs of cat littler?? can anyone loan me...
  15. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    Yes ive been working with turmel for ten years..first 12 flaws I made now we have 26..ive decided to go on my own..ive had more then 30 ppls charges stayed or withdrawn accross canada with 100% success rate.so I will continue the good fight on my own issues for now. As they are different then...
  16. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    I would tho!! ;)
  17. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    No lawyer has ever linked the mmar with the cdsa...bad exemption means no offence.
  18. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    just some notes I have kicking around..;) I just hope JC can make this link!!!
  19. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    *S.4 & S.7 PROHIBITIONS ON MARIHUANA *POSSESSION AND CULTIVATION ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL pursuant Parker ***and Krieger, the J.P. Court ruled possession and cultivation offences are valid while there is a constitutionally acceptable medical exemption in force and not valid otherwise; * THE...
  20. Doc Weedlaw

    your thoughts on today's court case(federal)

    The right of self-determination which underlies the doctrine of informed consent also obviously encompasses the right to refuse medical treatment. A competent adult is generally entitled to reject a specific treatment or all treatment, or to select an alternate form of treatment, even if the...
Top