I see nothing manipulative about it. The law is clear. We are entitled to possess our own and for our patient(s) as their caregivers. Do you see something that would indicate otherwise?
i see no legitimate argument that it is not legal. It is plain enough in the law that it does not require anything more than simple math. It has not up in court in almost six years.
Do yourselves both a favor and assign each other as each others' caregiver. The benefit is substantial. You can both then possess 2.5 oz each and another 2.5 for your "patient"', for a total of 10 zips.
For she is wise, if I can judge of her,
And fair she is, if mine eyes be true,
And true she is, as she hath proved herself,
And therefore, like herself, wise, fair and true,
Shall she remain in my constant soul,
It is not only asset forfeiture, but sentencing that goes ultra light for law officers for heinous crimes against citizens that plays a big part. Many times there is no punishment,
I am glad we agree that this type of documentation is smart. It clearly establishes a bona fide relationship. I have been advocating the documents and will continue in that.
Whatever slights you may be feeling, it is best to let them roll off. If they need to be spoken to it can be phrased...
Gotcha. Now we put this in the mix:
Press Release | 02/12/2014
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) Introduces Bill Allowing Drug Czar to Speak the Truth about Marijuana
Share:
Under Current Law Drug Czar Must Oppose Legalization of Marijuana, Even for Medical Use, No Matter What the Science Shows or What...
B*B's latest brainstorm is his attitude that the courts should give guidance regarding possession limits in sec 8 cases. The stuff is absolutely non toxic, It is impossible to consume enough to kill you. Per DEA Administrative Law judge Francis Young, he ruled:
“In strict medical terms marijuana...