Search results

sorry, but... rofl hilarious.

i believe hes saying your response to me clearly showing you what it says was really out there. UB?

now this is a standpoint i can respect. thank you for being clear and concise without hostility. im not sure what CCHHI is, if it is in regards to MJ policy im interested. will look it up shortly. in the mean time i have to ask you... oh oh the jack herer initiative from 08? if you have more...

you obviously missed the post of many of my friends and direct family still living there. not to mention the ripple effect it will have globally. we all have the right to weigh in because it effects us all. if you thinking you win means youll finally keep your nonsense out of here then that's...

if you have real concerns please state them and i will do my best to abate that fear. if i cannot i will look for the foundation of the claim and secede to the truths of it. however if you are unwilling to listen to the opposite side of it what do you hope to accomplish by arguing? getting...

hay...you aren't even worth the time... you really are a special kind of stupid. good growing to you, but i have yet to see anything you have to say being worthwhile in an adult conversation. funny or malicious, this isn't the forum for that. grow up. TR... pathetic. simply pathetic. your...

any other snarky remarks you wanna toss my way, or are you tired of looking like a fool and a jerk yet?

do you just enjoy annoying people? way too tired to keep reiterating the same thing over and over simply because you haven't learned to read. already answered. all it takes is a click on a link and a quick read...

ya know. i was going to stoop to your level, but i don't need to. you can go ahead and hide in your idiot cave, you've got nothing to say that hasn't already been rebutted. attacking me again is pathetic desperation.

well done all "yes-ers". cases were stated intelligently and without (much) bias. facts were used to educate not coerce. whether it passes or not even changing a few minds is a victory. lets keep spreading the education and hoping a change will come federally (2012 isnt far off). you dont need...

... rly? perhaps its the legalese language of it thats throwing you off. this quote from an article on http://www.opposingviews.com/i/anger-at-marijuana-smokers-who-oppose-prop-19 says it better than i could: Kirk Tousaw, writing in Cannabis Culture, examines this phenomenon, but in a...

or perhaps i was wrong about you and you should stick to mmj since prop 19 does nothing to effect your usage anyhow. sad, winning from forfeiture.

you didnt read the whole thing did you? im not calling you a moron. that was a hypothetical to make a point. come on back i like you having a polar opposite view. i wouldnt have thought to ask "why 1 ounce?" if it werent for you. :( seriously my aim is to educate. when i hear you say "you are...

i apologize if it seemed like an attack on anyone in particular, just a desire to push people to look beyond themselves and seek out more information than opinions and others translations.

read back ive never once blown you off with any kind of cop-out. in some cases "that's the way it is" is the correct answer and one you refuse to accept. however you not liking it doesnt make it any less correct. if you cant take the time to read what you are responding to you really ought not...

i never said you made anything up. i asked you to cite your source. you dont just speak for another person and take credit for their post. show me where you got that... even 1 link will suffice for arguments sake. please learn to listen

you mentioned trickery, fear-mongering is in fact trickery you have really got to start reading full posts. or maybe re-read them if you are smoking. youve asked many questions repeatedly and were baffled by things weve previously discussed because you either forgot what they said or didnt read...

that word we use "fear-mongering" means the spread of lies in an effort to invoke fear and force a modicum of control. its used far too often from the opponents side. not to sound dramatic, but i just find it curious that it hold a very similar definition as terrorism...

that was easy heres one from today: Former Anti-Drug Chiefs Seek To Block Legal Pot Posted by CN Staff on September 13, 2010 at 11:20:06 PT By Janie Lorber Source: New York Times California -- Every past administrator of the 37-year-old Drug Enforcement Administration is calling on the...

can you cite any of these claims? i havent seen a single one trying to take a stance of obscuring truth other than from opponents of the bill... gimme a min and ill cite that claim.