Search results

I don't know how to put it simplier for you, but I'll try. Within the discipline of economics, in dealing with the history of economic thought, the term 'modern corporation' is generally used to denote from when they were recognized as juridicial persons on. Take a junior level (300) economics...

It's understood that there would be a degree of division of labor. Even Marx recognized that.

This is a great point, Cookin. These societies wouldn't be able to handle market failures. Hell, their theorists still use LTV.

Just to recap, here's what I said that you take issue with: 'And given that the development of the modern corporation is fairly recent...' By modern corporation, I was referring from the late 19th century on when these entities were formally recognized as juridical persons, as is understood...

Like I said, he's not advocating 'mainstream' anarchism. It's obvious he's an anarcho-primitivist, vastly different from traditional anarchist schools of thought.

Forty-two out of forty-eight, six more than required...

He can't without trying to make the case that seven presidents didn't meet the requirements to hold the office.

What school of economics are you in favor of? Being as how I'm part of the left and not a proponent of Obama's economic policies (as most economists on the left aren't), do I not subscribe to 'liberal economics'? Does Stiglitz not adhere to 'liberal economics'? How about Galbraith? How about...

The OP isn't advocating for 'mainstream' anarchism. Much like nearly all schools of socialist thought, anarchists strive for a technologically advanced, modern society. And given that the development of the modern corporation is fairly recent, I see no reason why the goods and services you've...

That's kind of vague, so what do you mean by 'liberal economics'? I know you don't mean literal classical liberal or neoliberal economics. Are you referring to neoKeynesians? When's the last time a neoliberal won a Sveriges Riksbank Prize? That should keep you busy all day. The fact of the...

That makes no sense whatsoever. He was in office a full eight months before 9/11. He inherited a pre 9/11 economy.

Actually it's educational attainment.

They're both almost purely forms of entertainment, so it's not as if they're entirely different.

Funny thing is GrowRebel used Thompson's six-year-old timeline, which was factually based, as supportive evidence. Thompson knows more about 9/11 than perhaps anyone else. Does he believe that the government was behind the attacks? Absolutely not. Which his timeline painstakingly details...

What's wrong with you? First you categorize a billion people as not valuing life whatsoever, and then you say that the American left favors a plutocracy. You're a fucking loon.

You have to love a political and economic theory that calls for such a great reduction in our species that Malthus would blush. Could you point me to any hunter-gatherer civilizations?

I suppose in order to be a civil libertarian these days you must be part of the left. Not to even mention virtually every legal organization criticized the handling of detainees as well.

Do you have an actual criticism of Bolden, aside that he's black? He was also a Major General in the Air Force and an astronaut. That liberal extremist propagating liberalism throughout the solar system. How dare he!

Pineapple Punch, Violator Kush, and Bubblegum. I've grown Pineapple Punch a couple of times, and while I've never came across a pheno that smelt like pineapple, it did smell sweet and was a nice high.

Hard to argue against facts.