Search results

54 watts of agromax pure uv per 1000 watts is all you need

FYI, there isn't any UV in that spectrum he posted.

Bro, that's not UV. Learn your light spectrum :P This is UV: 54 watt Agromax Pure UV. A little does go a long way, but there isn't even a little in your chart there. UV does go 10 - 400 nm, but the 10-300 part is useless because it kills life. UV/A UVB go 300 - 400. Your chart starts at 380...

Yeah it's a simple equation as long as you accounted for 100% airlock. Difficult in a lot of site cuz you have to 1. be able to achieve 100% airlock, and 2. Be able to transition and get in and out... It'd be extra work for questionable gains with heightened risk. But doable.

the CO doesn't hurt plants, so yeah you could run a completely air tight room and you'd get all the co2 and plants would be fine... Just don't go in that fuckin' room until it's 100% clean air, and it better be 100% sealed. Like actually air tight, not grow room air tight.

Yeah, OSHA don't give a fuck :P But really, your exhaust could be tip top and still 100 ppms of CO. Do you have a meter?

You are actually doing it? That's a situation I would be interested in carbon monoxide meter. Do you have one?

I don't know man. Seems hard to convince people who actually grow marijuana that a paraffin candle is ok... It's an uphill climb... Ever see idiocracy? :P Could experiment, just know working with toxic level carbon monoxide, at the home level that's tough. There is technology to remove carbon...

The adults are actually having a conversation about nasty gases while you draw dick pics... I'm sure the irony eludes you.

Yeah, so I think it'd be pretty dangerous in most cases, definitely get a meter. I'd say no way. Here's a guidline for Realtor assoc. hoe inspector that allows up to 100ppm of carbon monoxide coming from the exhaust of vented appliances...

Oh, I'm positive it is. I was just speaking, myself, my heating isn't set up in such a way to where it'd be practical to experiment even if it was awesome, just the layout of the house. But it could surely be done, don't know what effort would take.

If that's a reasoned line of thinking for you, ride it out. Blake, we agree, you can't safely handle candles... We're on the same page.

Because carbon monoxide. Your logic is degrading, which is tough, since you were last seen drawing dick pics and chuckling in the corner.

I don't know. Can't think of a convenient rig in my situation even if worked well. I think the potential hazards would be carbon monoxide or nitrogen dioxide poisoning, but I don't know, would want a meter or read more.

I was gonna try to post something funny relating to "candle porn"... but that shit ain't funny...

Hijack? Hell no man, you're one of the most reasoned people to add to this!... Not saying much, but... :P Nah man, you added good stuff

No reason not to make wine. It would be a healthy jolt of co2. Why not add a waterfall next to it. Or not. I got books in my rooms, little couch, have some lemonade or tea... I'm not getting all this either or thing, I'm really not. People can't do both? Or do both with a tank?Or no CO2? Or a...

Can we be somewhat real here? I post these pictures because what the hell are we talking about? These are designed to 1. light the candle 2. walk the fuck away... Do you guys really think the votif candles of america are being watched?! Seriously, what's the average time the average votif is...

Whoa. I've never googled "candle porn" before... and never will again.

Fine, I'll bite, troll who has already displayed he can't spell or add in this short thread alone, and proven some sad IQ insecurities.. What's your spin? Why is it bullshit? Burn the house down? toxic? what?.... Oh, wait a minute. I don't give a shit. You can go ahead and have the last word...