Search results

Still waiting for you to show that the ppms your plant uses at the end are being turned into weight or potency. Maybe you won't ignore that for third time..,

I'm not the one calling people names and telling them not to follow their nutrient schedules. Im not the one that needs to justify myself. If you're going to act like this, and tell people that their nutrient schedules are wrong, you need a reason. I've already justified why I do what I do. All...

These guys call anything where you don't feed full nutes until the end flushing but can't proving feeding until the end produces better results than cutting off npk nutes. #teamtrolling

see post 15, they call it flushing, i really don't care.

I throw away everything I trim off in veg.

Canna's schedule has you cut out base nutes and increase cannazym which is their cheapest additive and is used to break down dead roots to help condition the medium for the next grow since they recommend reusing it. It's saving money doing it this way, I really don't think they are just out to...

Why would they tell you to use less of their product though?

I get called a troll because I disagree. My argument has been the same since post 15 and nobody has shown that feeding until harvest increases yield or potency. You guys are forum warriors, because I disagree with a well known forum poster that you like you tell me stfu and leave, form your own...

Lol, why did you start talking about me being rude and not you if you didn't want me to respond?

I don't keep insulting people, the worst you have accused me of is being unintelligent, while you repeatedly insult people for no reason, I'm not the rude one in that situation.

Thank you for being polite. I believe you on the cash grab operations, I just find it hard to discredit every person who has grown both ways and smoked both ways and thinks flushing is a postive. My point is that with out something saying there is 'x' benefit, neither side is right or wrong. Not...

Then link a scientific study defending your stance that feeding until harvest is beneficial.

That the person has a cough attack or it hurts their lungs or weakens their immune system, any kind of bad reaction.

The risk I'm referring to is medical patients saying that there is a risk for them having a bad reaction smoking unflushed weed. I don't have a scientific study to link, after talking to multiple people saying they have had a bad reaction, my reasoning is that there is a risk.

Is it producing any noticeable gains? You guys keep asking me for proof but haven't provided any for this. Yes ppm's disappear, what does the plant do with them? Create more flower? Make it more potent? And I never said anything about the plant storing salts. I'm not assuming salts being in the...

No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying there is a risk that not flushing causes problems for sick people, I'm simply ask for a reason why it's worth risking.

Didn't mean to imply that you did, I just meant earlier than I do now with 30-40% amber.

Can you say why not flushing is beneficial? Otherwise you can go ahead and apologize for the insults and saying that I am wrong.

This has been the basis of my question since post 15. If you can't say why feeding until harvest is beneficial, and there is a slight possibility that it isn't, why would you do it?

I actually like a stonier high, I have harvested earlier before and prefer some droopy eyelids.