Search results

There is no confusion and I didn't leave any room for it. Post #201. I wrote it, you have read it, and several others possibly. I gave him advice and information on how to deal with people. The same advice you just gave and acknowleged as me giving him the same. Me stating a viewpoint that Oly...

I've already answered this in the post you just quoted. Reading is Fundamental. The ability to Comprehend even more so.

I thought it was a cool pic.. I started to use this one.. It was never a matter of me attempting to use something of a realistic nature.. edit: I also wanted to state a good eye of observance as well. It is a drawing by an artist and not a computer drawing. Here's a link to some more of her...

I'm not sure of your meaning, but No, it's not my hand... It's being presented as imagery for the purpose at hand. No need to grab a phone or camera to post a picture of my hand when a millisec google search could provide the same results.

until some more qualified Atheist of logic and Reason come along, here's a choice I've decided to make....

Stop REd/Blue highlighting words that mean nothing absence of the whole. It's right there in black/white and it's not my definition. Go, edit wiki so that the rest of the world gets it right by your standards of the word. This is just Hot ass Smoke because you have been the only one being...

And this is a correct assertment. Science is not some independent self aligned being of correct righteousness. If science never existed that same independent self aligned quality of correctness would remain. The only thing that changes is the interpretation made by those who attempt to explain...

Here's the short short short version.. You think believers make bad choices. I think people make bad choices.. See the difference... What kind of irrational beliefs have been put forth by science.. I don't know Pad, the science has always been correct in the past. The science is always right...

No, GI didnt address anything.... And you all are slowww. That's the only advice I know for sure Oly was correct about. Please don't think yourselves as to be better equiped to handle life with your assumed ability to think logically and reasonably.. I didn't say Oly, I said me...

I'm not mixing anything subjective with objective you are. I'm giving you the total encompassed meaning and concept of rational.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational Rationality is the exercise of reason, in philosophy. It is the manner in which people derive conclusions when considering...

Big Billy.. I comprehend everything you are saying, and yet you have the slightest clue I think as to what I am saying (I think but consider the fact of you probably joshing me :-P). Even after I have displayed it right before your eyes. But that is the premise of all small minds shared alike...

No, read and comprehend the full definition and concept of what rationality is. I think you don't understand rationality. Answer this: Do you find it rational to stick a Dick up your Ass? Please answer this question...

Ok Santa.., Now what god do you not want me to believe in?

Yes, one can say the same thing about science. Einstein was ridiculed for being irrational about his theories. Just as past and present theories by Scientist are found to be of irrational degrees. Before you Ice a Cake, you have to bake One first..

I provided a worldly view answer. It wasn't my personal answer to the question. If you don't like it go edit wiki and submit a new definition for the world to accept. If you read what I did say, then you would see that to comprehend the others rationality, one must first engage each others...

Exactly, but thats what I said a few posts ago... Oh, I'm a believer. Hands over Ears/Eyes... Hypocrite - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite That is why Oly doesn't respect nothing you have to say. This isn't the first time he has engaged your posts.

I could care less. He asked a question. I gave him the information he sought. If you cared to know the rational of what others thought, you would have read it throughout as well. I did. I found Rational reasons and Irrational reasons. I also understand the concept of Rational and it doesn't...

Your understanding is correct. I know a stance may be made to say defined terms are all we have and should be defined as such. However we must use the defined as a means to understanding the gray in between. The gray never appears definable by any definition and there is no black to white...

I don't know Pad. Is there any rational reasons to believe in God? Let's see what a quick google search brings up..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God Arguments for the existence of God The cosmological argument argues that there was a "first cause", or "prime mover"...

Irony: Those that don't seek out God accept the pitfalls of their humanity justified through religion. Those who choose to seek out God grow closer to their creator and they no longer accept the pitfalls of their religion.... I just made that shit up but I'm sure it's been said before...