No one said you were mean - this isn't personal.
Mm hmm I like my bud deep fried with a little mustard mm hmm
Lol, I could of told you 10-14 will give you a faster finish with less yield 30 years ago. Dont know about more potency with the types most people are used to growing. Though the more sativa/tropical types types will defo give better bud ,beter results, beter finished flowers that are more potent under 10-14 as the flowering response is stronger. You can even veg them under 13-11. But if your talking about plants made for indoors more indica leaning types your beter off sticking to 12-12 for flower and 18-6 for veg, decades of experimentation from millions confirms this.
all good i was a bit amazed when i first watched maybe it was the live chat that added to the ferver(?) cheers
interesting nice
seems like it was a legit type of university and/or institutionally funded study. he talks about three strains overall in the different experiments but i think only uses examples of two of them (sunset and og) for the photoperiod studies since they did better at 10/14
Good to know...thanks! (For context, this worked great with SSH and OGKush) I did the gradual half hour reduction every two weeks, after the stretch.
That chart dont make much sense, as it dont show were the finished ripe plants are more potent under 10-14 vs finished ripe plants under 12-12. It also dont show the yield of finished ripe bud under 10-14 vs finished ripe bud yeild under 12-12 wich are all the things that maters. An then in the pictures it dont show you the results of each individual plant of the same strain cutting of something like 30 plants vs each individual plants of the same strain cutting again 30 plants. This would then have to be repeated something like 10 times for a experiment and results to actually mean something. Another thing did they veg them all for the same time cus on that chart it looks odd. From the chart it looks like the tiger strain was the same at 12-12 and 10_14 but the other strains weren't, that would actually show that his experiment dont actually work as they are claiming. Maybe im reading it wrong, dont seem to be set out as a great chart at all.The science with cannabis is still in its infancy, the underground community as a whole and growing literally billions of plants over 50 years is far far ahead in getting the best yields out of cannabis and pushing the potency taliored for smoking and other human use. Ive seen some of these scientific grows and pharmaceutical grows, and some of them are bad much like the plants in the 70s flowering under florescent tube shop lights.
I have never tried a schedule other than 12/12 for flowering so am not going to throw in an opinion, but I do find it humorous that you talk about bro science and phd studies (which are very often flawed,) then throw out a google search result as fact. Now that’s scientific.
Clearly never grown a real OG before.
I think @torontoke was doing some work like this, low daylight hours.
I'm running a 9 on 15 off I'm 4 weeks in my buds are fat, can they mature too quick
Yeah, that would be me
when I started this, it was 6/18 for bud for a few weeks but I found the sweet spot to be 7 on, 17 off. I’ve been doing it for the past 14 months. From my experience, it cuts my bud time down 5-8 days. Buds are just as dank and the same yield if not more.
Shit, cut it down to 7 hours on, 17 off….trust me.
