FriendlyGuy
Well-Known Member
Im thinkin 30 but than again i know for sure 50 would PROB be more of a crisp image.. BUT if that were true than im sure people wouldnt keep repping up 30x.. I never seen anyone say "oh id get a 50x micro scope for your grow too" is it because 30 does the job and 50 fuckin NAILS the job? but for people on budgets theyd rather saving money over performance?